DO RELATIVITY ZOMBIES UNDERSTAND RELATIVITY HYPNOTISTS?

"Pentcho Valev" wrote in message
ups.com...
and all statements of Master Tom Roberts extremely perspicacious.

Is that your word for the day?

That
is good. Your problem is that you do not know who is the author of the
following statement:

"if it is ultimately discovered that the photon has a nonzero mass
(i.e. light in vacuum does not travel at the invariant speed of the
Lorentz transform), SR would be unaffected but both Maxwell's
equations and QED would be refuted (or rather, their domains of
applicability would be reduced)."

If I am the author, the statement is extremely stupid. However if
Master Tom Roberts is the author, the statement is extremely
perspicacious. I think I am the author and therefore the statement is
extremely stupid. What do YOU think?

That you're an obsessed fool.

Jeckyl wrote:
"Pentcho Valev" wrote in message
ups.com...
and all statements of Master Tom Roberts extremely perspicacious.

Is that your word for the day?

That
is good. Your problem is that you do not know who is the author of the
following statement:

"if it is ultimately discovered that the photon has a nonzero mass
(i.e. light in vacuum does not travel at the invariant speed of the
Lorentz transform), SR would be unaffected but both Maxwell's
equations and QED would be refuted (or rather, their domains of
applicability would be reduced)."

If I am the author, the statement is extremely stupid. However if
Master Tom Roberts is the author, the statement is extremely
perspicacious. I think I am the author and therefore the statement is
extremely stupid. What do YOU think?

That you're an obsessed fool.

No I was just dishonest. I am not the author, Master Tom Roberts is
the author of the breathtaking statement:

Tom Roberts: "if it is ultimately discovered that the photon has a
nonzero mass (i.e. light in vacuum does not travel at the invariant
speed of the Lorentz transform), SR would be unaffected but both
Maxwell's equations and QED would be refuted (or rather, their domains
of applicability would be reduced)."

Now I think the statement is not extremely stupid; rather, it is
extremely clever. What do YOU think?

Pentcho Valev

"Pentcho Valev" wrote in message
ups.com...

Jeckyl wrote:
"Pentcho Valev" wrote in message
ups.com...
and all statements of Master Tom Roberts extremely perspicacious.

Is that your word for the day?

That
is good. Your problem is that you do not know who is the author of the
following statement:

"if it is ultimately discovered that the photon has a nonzero mass
(i.e. light in vacuum does not travel at the invariant speed of the
Lorentz transform), SR would be unaffected but both Maxwell's
equations and QED would be refuted (or rather, their domains of
applicability would be reduced)."

If I am the author, the statement is extremely stupid. However if
Master Tom Roberts is the author, the statement is extremely
perspicacious. I think I am the author and therefore the statement is
extremely stupid. What do YOU think?

That you're an obsessed fool.

No I was just dishonest. I am not the author, Master Tom Roberts is
the author of the breathtaking statement:

Tom Roberts: "if it is ultimately discovered that the photon has a
nonzero mass (i.e. light in vacuum does not travel at the invariant
speed of the Lorentz transform), SR would be unaffected but both
Maxwell's equations and QED would be refuted (or rather, their domains
of applicability would be reduced)."

Now I think the statement is not extremely stupid; rather, it is
extremely clever. What do YOU think?

That you're a self-obsessed fool.