How Old is our Universe?

On Jun 25, 11:20 pm, nightbat wrote:
nightbat wrote

Double-A wrote:

Commander Double-A

On Jun 19, 3:45 pm, (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:

Zan Black holes take from our universe but are not part of our universe
A neutron star is part of our universe. A black hole is only part of
space. Reality is it is a hole in space. That is my imperial
thinking,and not to be challenged. bert

Hawking's latest thinking is that black holes are totally a part of
our universe and do not connect with other universes. That is my
thinking too.

Double-A

nightbat

That was a major win for profound Science Officers Commander
after many years of mainstream net heckling until Hawking realized there
was no imperial evidence for sci fi based multiverse. We took the heat
and Peer co-affirming evidence made them come around. When you're as
good as an Earth Science Team Officer no one else compares.

carry on,
the nightbat


You are absolutely correct, Captain. The Science Officer team was on
the cutting edge on his one. Hawking finally realized that those
black hole drains from which nothing could ever emerge just could not
exist. Kind of makes you wonder if Hawking reads alt.astronomy on the
sly to get his best ideas!

Double-A

P.S. Where have you been, Sir? While the Captain's away, the coffee
boys will play.

Double-A wrote:
On Jun 25, 11:20 pm, nightbat wrote:

nightbat wrote

Double-A wrote:

Commander Double-A


On Jun 19, 3:45 pm, (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:

Zan Black holes take from our universe but are not part of our universe
A neutron star is part of our universe. A black hole is only part of
space. Reality is it is a hole in space. That is my imperial
thinking,and not to be challenged. bert

Hawking's latest thinking is that black holes are totally a part of
our universe and do not connect with other universes. That is my
thinking too.

Double-A

nightbat

That was a major win for profound Science Officers Commander
after many years of mainstream net heckling until Hawking realized there
was no imperial evidence for sci fi based multiverse. We took the heat
and Peer co-affirming evidence made them come around. When you're as
good as an Earth Science Team Officer no one else compares.

carry on,
the nightbat


Commander Double-A

You are absolutely correct, Captain. The Science Officer team was on
the cutting edge on his one. Hawking finally realized that those
black hole drains from which nothing could ever emerge just could not
exist. Kind of makes you wonder if Hawking reads alt.astronomy on the
sly to get his best ideas!

Double-A

P.S. Where have you been, Sir? While the Captain's away, the coffee
boys will play.

nightbat

Hello Commander and cheers, I've been in extremely deep science
research as usual and enjoying my summer. The dolls are everywhere at my
heels and you can never get enough of that endless earth beauty sweet
juice. Still waiting for my Sil to be Pom galactic authority permitted
to whisk us away to the Milkyway and our Sean Star babe eternal bliss.

The Nasa planned Mars Mission is progressing nicely and maybe just maybe
we will get our day in outer space.

See:
http://www.space.com/scienceastronom...aform.htmlSee:

Also See:
http://www.space.com/news/070620_mars_500.html


One manned Mars space probe will, per Seans, get us our Nightbat
Starship ticket, lets hope Nasa can get the lead out.

carry on,
the nightbat

nightbat You being our caption must tell us when you are leaving the
helm.(deck) How old sir do believe our universe is? Do others have
their own guess in this astronomy group? Do we have to take the imperial
guess of those that put the age in print as reality? The honest imperial
thinkers say they are guessing. That I can believe bert

G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:
Scott your post is like all your posts just sweet fudge. You never once
mentioned the reality of photons leaving the Sun's core in the high
energy of gamma and it is this type of photon that atoms absorb and emit
as the case may be You claim they hit other particles and that is what
slows them down Hmmmmm That has to hold true for reflected light. like
a mirror having photons hit the silver they must like a ball hitting a
wall come to a stop before bouncing back. "RIGHT" Scott you are more
than just an idiot. You are a "complete idiot". bert PS
what type of particles do these gamma photons hit? They do lose energy
and come out in a photon mix(white light) You still have not told me
how a photon having a speed of 3mph can get its velocity back to 'c''
and you never will.


Well Bert - If I thought you were intellegent, I would have went into
more detail. As it is, I was trying to keep it simple in reflection of
your low level of intelligence.

I have told you how it was accomplished. If you don't understand it -
sorry, I can't make it any simpler than that. Apparently you are not
even as bright as I assumed, and that wasn't much.

BradGuth wrote:


And your fine contribution(s) to science and humanity is?????????
-
Brad Guth


Pointing out that losers such as yourself do not have a clue about
anything scientific.

BradGuth wrote:

Is a true Zion in denial as good as it gets?
-
Brad Guth


The denial comes from you - you apparently haven't the intelligence to
take the information I have provided you in the past and do something
positive with it. As I said, I completed the calculations and stand
ready to correct any math errors you might make - assuming you could
even complete them. But, apparently, that is hoping too much because
you continue to attempt to link me to something I have no connection
with rather than put up numbers for comparison.

BradGuth wrote:
On Jun 21, 9:02 pm, Scott Miller wrote:

BradGuth wrote:

On Jun 18, 5:16 am, (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:

Scott your thinking is going with our most powerful telescopes that can
see galaxies 12 billion LY away.Now that's from our view point. Now
lets take these great telescopes to one of these 12 billion LY away
galaxies and look in the direction away from our Milky Way . Do you
think we would see the universe's horizon? After all it would only be
2.8 billion LY out. I say we would see what we see now. To tricky for
you to comprehend Scott and you are lost for its not in the books on
your desk Sad but true bert

Scott is a devout naysay Zionist, thus anything ET or otherwise off-
world doesn't matter, especially if there's any intelligent design
involved.

The best SWAG of an open mindset, as based upon physics and the best
available science, is looking at 20+ billion years, although
obviously
this is not the one and only universe that's out there, especially if
ours emerged from a mega black hole or God fart that obviously had to
have coexisted within a much greater mother universe.

However, 20 billion years is not suffiicient for complex DNA/RNA to
evolve via happenstance into the highly bigoted, arrogant and greedy
sorts of Zion folks like Scott Miller, much less of the millions of
other
life forms that are complex and having been so much smarter about
their survival than us humans.
-
"whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell
-
Brad Guth

How clever - he can type words and repeat himself and still say nothing.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Zion damage-control???????
-
Brad Guth


Your lack of anything beyond racial slurs marks you as a real loser.
But then, that had already been established.

BradGuth wrote:

Scott is merely a Zion fart, and not even a very good one at that.
-
Brad Guth


Bzzzt. Wrong again, but par for the course as far as you are concerned.

BradGuth wrote:
On Jun 24, 4:24 am, (Tom Kerr) wrote:

In article , (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:


Scott Again you jump on my thoughts I never said the red shift was the
only way astronomers measure great distances.

No, but you did say this:

" We are basing are measurements on the more red stars get with distance
and that is a big rub. [...]"

Which, to anyone in the field, shows you haven't the slightest clue what
you are talking about.


But lord Scott knows all there is to know, and then some, as long as
it goes along with his Zion mindset.
-
Brad Guth


Well, now we have established you can't read either. Kept this note of
yours intact because I didn't make the quote you attribute to me.
Thought it, but didn't type it.

And what is your facination with Zion - is your male lover of that religion?

G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:
Scott People that come to this news group are not just looking for
answers. They could go to Google. They are here to discuse astronomy.
and give their view of the universe,and its mysteries. Most like myself
have read the latest books . Most have open minds,and smart enough to
see imperial answers that have to be challenged. You Scott Miller have
just a Google brain and all you need to know are in the books on your
desk. I like to hypothesise beyond what is written bert


If they come to discuse (sic) astronomy, it is important to show them
who the loons are (people like you for example) who spill crap into this
newsgroup as if they actually know something. And, based on what I read
so far, you couldn't construct a simple, scientifically valid hypothesis
if one was handed to you first.