![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Jorge R. Frank wrote: And it's a good thing they didn't; they *thought* they had the technology but they didn't. There is no ****ing way that Apollo-era life support systems would have sustained a crew to Mars and back, plus they grossly underestimated the total radiation dose (Apollo got lucky with the timing of solar flares, pure and simple.) Well, they did have that solar storm watch keeping an eye on on unstable areas of the Sun as they came into view from Earth. If a walloping big area of sunspots and flares came into view as they were readying a Apollo mission I'm sure they would have delayed it till the next favorable launch geometry presented itself. And any sort of long-term stay on the Moon is going to inevitably have a crew up there someday when a solar storm hits. Pat |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
sci.space.policy impact on policy | John Schilling | Policy | 4 | June 23rd 06 02:02 AM |
Shuttle Replacement Needs to Become a National Priority!!! | jonathan | Policy | 70 | August 15th 05 06:33 PM |
"Space policy and the size of the space shuttle fleet" | MasterShrink | Space Shuttle | 0 | December 26th 04 05:35 AM |
Spaceguard-Priority List | Matthew D. Mills | Amateur Astronomy | 1 | March 4th 04 04:28 AM |
Mars Exploration and the Search for Life is a Priority Says UK ScienceMinister (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | December 29th 03 12:57 PM |