A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Policy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Satellites Collide in First-Ever Mid-Space Crash



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 16th 09, 12:47 AM posted to sci.space.policy
speedevil
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3
Default Satellites Collide in First-Ever Mid-Space Crash

On 15 Feb, 15:31, "
wrote:
On Feb 14, 3:28*pm, Allen Thomson wrote:

On Feb 14, 10:59*am, speedevil wrote:


Has anyone seen anything listing the delta-v of the explosion?


The collision was broadside, so the relative velocity was something
like 8 km/s. Kinetic/chemical break-even is a little under 3 km/s.


Well, orbital velocity at that altitude is about 7.5 km/s, so a
perpendicular collision would give a relative velocity of about 10.6
km/s.


Of the explosion, not of the impact.
Modelling the two satellites as 1m/1000Kg cubes, with a 1kg/m^2 wing
sticking out of them.

There are (ISTM) (broadly) three classes of impacts.

Direct body-body contact.

Plenty of energy to completely vapourise everything, some hard bits
may come out, massive delta-v of several Km/s for the average (largely
vapourised) particle. (~50MJ/Kg)


Body-solar panel contact.

More or less similar to what'd happen if you placed 5mm or so of high
explosive over the area of the body impacted.
Still 50MJ/Kg for the colliding bits, but diluted 1000:1 over the
entire satellite body that's impacting, for 50KJ/Kg or so. A few
hundred meters a second delta-v for the average solid or melted
particle, with lots and lots of shredded stuff, but some largely
intact bits.

Solar panel-solar panel contact.

Say 1m^2 of solar panel impact 2m from the body.
This might be the 'normal' case. (eyeballing the iridium satellite,
maybe 3-4 times more likely than other forms?)

You have a 200MJ explosion 2m from the satellite, resulting in total
vaporisation of the solar panels involved, and production of a gas
cloud expanding at 5Km-s.

This may even - if everything goes just right - completely miss the
main body of the satellite.
If it hits, it's probably broadly similar to the above case, but with
maybe poorer coupling to the satellite, as some may expand and miss
the body, perhaps impacting the solar panels.

Rather similar to the above case, but with lower velocities due to the
poorer coupling.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Space debris and satellites [email protected] Space Shuttle 2 August 16th 08 12:12 AM
Drudge: Spy satellites watch Americans from space Jim Oberg Policy 371 July 1st 06 05:37 AM
NASA's Space Technology 5 Satellites Soar Into Space (Forwarded) Andrew Yee News 0 March 22nd 06 05:16 PM
why not send old satellites out into space? [email protected] Policy 29 April 28th 05 06:07 PM
Can Wall Street figure out the cause of a space shuttle crash faster than NASA's experts? Rand Simberg Policy 17 August 14th 03 11:15 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.