![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 15 Feb, 15:31, "
wrote: On Feb 14, 3:28*pm, Allen Thomson wrote: On Feb 14, 10:59*am, speedevil wrote: Has anyone seen anything listing the delta-v of the explosion? The collision was broadside, so the relative velocity was something like 8 km/s. Kinetic/chemical break-even is a little under 3 km/s. Well, orbital velocity at that altitude is about 7.5 km/s, so a perpendicular collision would give a relative velocity of about 10.6 km/s. Of the explosion, not of the impact. Modelling the two satellites as 1m/1000Kg cubes, with a 1kg/m^2 wing sticking out of them. There are (ISTM) (broadly) three classes of impacts. Direct body-body contact. Plenty of energy to completely vapourise everything, some hard bits may come out, massive delta-v of several Km/s for the average (largely vapourised) particle. (~50MJ/Kg) Body-solar panel contact. More or less similar to what'd happen if you placed 5mm or so of high explosive over the area of the body impacted. Still 50MJ/Kg for the colliding bits, but diluted 1000:1 over the entire satellite body that's impacting, for 50KJ/Kg or so. A few hundred meters a second delta-v for the average solid or melted particle, with lots and lots of shredded stuff, but some largely intact bits. Solar panel-solar panel contact. Say 1m^2 of solar panel impact 2m from the body. This might be the 'normal' case. (eyeballing the iridium satellite, maybe 3-4 times more likely than other forms?) You have a 200MJ explosion 2m from the satellite, resulting in total vaporisation of the solar panels involved, and production of a gas cloud expanding at 5Km-s. This may even - if everything goes just right - completely miss the main body of the satellite. If it hits, it's probably broadly similar to the above case, but with maybe poorer coupling to the satellite, as some may expand and miss the body, perhaps impacting the solar panels. Rather similar to the above case, but with lower velocities due to the poorer coupling. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Space debris and satellites | [email protected] | Space Shuttle | 2 | August 16th 08 12:12 AM |
Drudge: Spy satellites watch Americans from space | Jim Oberg | Policy | 371 | July 1st 06 05:37 AM |
NASA's Space Technology 5 Satellites Soar Into Space (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | News | 0 | March 22nd 06 05:16 PM |
why not send old satellites out into space? | [email protected] | Policy | 29 | April 28th 05 06:07 PM |
Can Wall Street figure out the cause of a space shuttle crash faster than NASA's experts? | Rand Simberg | Policy | 17 | August 14th 03 11:15 AM |