![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here's a quick back-of-the-envelope:
The collision happened at 750 km altitude, which is the most populated part of earth orbit: http://www.armscontrolwonk.com/2185/the-future-is-now ....from that histogram, it looks like there are about N_satellites = 300 satellites between 700 and 800 km altitude. For a collision to happen, two satellites have to be in the same place at the same time. By "in the same place", let's say the two satellites would have to be in a cubical that is 2 m x 2 m x 2 m (satellite bus is usually smaller than this, but solar panels bigger, so this is a compromise) for a collision to happen. Between 700 and 800 km, how many of these "cubes" are the N_cubes = 4*pi*R^2*t_layer / V_cube (where t_layer is the "thickness" of the layer of LEO we are examining: 100 km) = 4 * 3.14 * ((6380+700)*10^3 m)^2 * 100*10^3 / (2 m)^3 = 7.9*10^18 cubes By "at the same time", the residence time of a satellite moving through a 2 m cube at 7.5 km/s is t_residence = 2 m / (7500 m/s) = 2.7*10^-4 s (or 270 microseconds) In a given year, the number of these "timeslots" is: N_timeslots = 365*24*60*60 seconds/t_residence = 1.2*10^11 timeslots If satellites are more or less randomly bouncing around this volume of space (think of a gas where satellites are individual molecules), then the odds of any satellite being in the same cube as a particular satellite at a given instant (i.e., in a given time slot) is: P_1sat = N_satellites / N_cubes = 3.8*10^-17 Very unlikely. But over the course of a year, the odds become P_1satYear = N_timeslots * P_1sat = 4.57*10^-6 or "one in 200,000". But, there are N_satellites, so the odds of *any* satellite colliding with *any* *other* satellite over a year are P_anySatYear = N_satellites * P_1satYear = 1.37*10^-3 or "one in 700". Now, over the past 30 years of having a large number of satellites on orbit, the odds of satellite-satellite collision drop to: P_SpaceAge = P_anySatYear * 30 years = 0.04 ....or "one in 25". Entirely reasonable. The only mystery is why this collision wasn't predicted and the orbit of the Iridium satellite tweaked well in advance. -- Andrew J. Higgins Mechanical Engineering Dept. Associate Professor McGill University Shock Wave Physics Group Montreal, Quebec CANADA http://people.mcgill.ca/andrew.higgins/ |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 12, 9:17*pm, Rick Jones wrote:
wrote: Here's a quick back-of-the-envelope: I like the writeup and have no qualifications by which to challenge it, but still have to ask ![]() Doesn't it presume that satellite orbits are completely random? *How does their not being random change the math? Yes, my estimate was based on the assumption that satellites are more or less passing randomly through space in a particular "shell" of LEO. The fact that satellites occupy orbits complicates the calculation considerably, but I doubt it will change my estimate by more than an order of magnitude. For example, the fact that Iridium 33 was launched from Baikonur and Kosmos-2251 from Plesetsk means that both satellites were confined to inclinations greater than 49 degrees, probably making a collision more likely. The conclusion to draw from a simple, order-of-magnitude calculation like this is that a random satellite-satellite collision is not outside the realm of the possible. Had the numbers come out "1 in a million" instead of "1 in 25", it would time to start considering the *deliberate* collision of one satellite into the other. -- Andrew J. Higgins Mechanical Engineering Dept. Associate Professor McGill University Shock Wave Physics Group Montreal, Quebec CANADA http://people.mcgill.ca/andrew.higgins/ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NASA's FUSE Satellite Catches Collision of Titans (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | June 13th 07 06:13 PM |
NASA's FUSE Satellite Catches Collision of Titans (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee[_1_] | News | 0 | June 13th 07 05:24 PM |
Launch of Optical Inter-orbit Communication Engineering Test Satellite (OICETS) and piggyback satellite INDEX | Jacques van Oene | News | 0 | July 28th 05 04:13 AM |