Milky Way rotates faster and as heavy as Andromeda

On Feb 8, 4:08*pm, BradGuth wrote:
On Feb 8, 3:29*pm, Double-A wrote:





On Feb 8, 9:37*am, BradGuth wrote:

On Feb 8, 7:02*am, (oldcoot) wrote:

AA wrote, re. "speed of darkness":

Are we talking photoffs here?

No, darkons. :-)

The speed of dark gravity could be c, 2c or for all we know c2.

Electrons seem to coexist as a BH point-source of combined dark matter
plus dark energy.

*~ BG

Citation?

The best available physics and science is what can't seem to
objectively measure the physical radius of an individual electron.
Most of physics and science has given up on getting any electron
volumetric size, although not of its mass or worth of energy.

In other words, a trillion electrons compacted and/or merged together
would weigh 9.1094e-16 g, and yet as a whole they'd still be dark and
nearly if not still representing a singularity.

Why can't an electron be a BH singularity?

*~ BG


Wheeler thought it was.

Double-A

Double A If an electron can be a BH (I do not think it is) its spin
would have to be so great to overcome its gravity. My spin theory has it
spinning at c TreBert

On Feb 11, 4:19*am, (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:
Double A If an electron can be a BH (I do not think it is) its spin
would have to be so great to overcome its gravity. My spin theory has it
spinning at c * TreBert


Can't do better than c.

Double-A

AA wrote, reposting "~BG":

Why can't an electron be a BH singularity?
*
Wheeler thought it was.

More realistically, the proton as a 'point particle' would be the analog
of a BH. Contrast this with the electron's being pictured as an
encircling cloud or 'shell' and an orbital of the central proton, as in
the H atom.

On Feb 11, 4:37*am, (oldcoot) wrote:
AA wrote, reposting "~BG":

Why can't an electron be a BH * * * * * * singularity?
*
Wheeler thought it was.

More realistically, the proton as a 'point particle' would be the analog
of a BH. Contrast this with the electron's being pictured as an
encircling cloud or 'shell' and an orbital of the central proton, as in
the H atom.


The big mystery to me is why the masses of protons are always the
same, and the same with electrons, and the ratio of their masses is
always the same, at least as close as we can measure.

My suspicion is that there might be slight differences based upon the
absorption and emmision of photons, but that some process makes them
tend towards a certain mass.

Double-A

oc Where have you been? Typed that on the key board you sent me. Works
great. You will get a letter from me Saturday. Sent it out today.
Cloud structure of an electron is made up of every type of photon. Part
of natures balancing act is to keep electrons 100% balanced. Absorbed
and emitting photons of the same energy is mother natures #1 balancing
act. This is the heart of my spin is in theory. TreBert

On Feb 11, 1:44*pm, (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:
oc *Where have you been? Typed that on the key board you sent me. Works
great. You will get a letter from me Saturday. *Sent it out today.
Cloud structure of an electron is made up of every type of photon. Part
of natures balancing act is to keep electrons 100% balanced. Absorbed
and emitting photons of the same energy is mother natures #1 balancing
act. * *This is the heart of my spin is in theory. TreBert

It the density of an electron were 1e241e27 g/cm3, makes its volume
rather small and likely invisible (like a black hole).

~ BG