An Attractive Proposition -

Addendum to prior post:

...if the medium does exist, then it also has to "support" or
"contain" magnetic
and electric fields. .

Also, no statements about how electric and magnetic forces arise
areprovided. Are these also push forces?

Of course they are push forces. This was discussed repeatedly and at
length here in past years. One of the fundamental tenets of the CBB
model is the essential bipolarity of all high spin rate BHs and of the
proton as a microscale BH analog. The proton is a dipole with clear-cut
'N' and 'S' magnetic poles. Their 'sign' or polarity is determined by
*direction of spin* of the spaceflow going into the poles. That is to
say, the 'N' vortex spins CW going in, and the 'S' vortex spins CCW
going in, while the whole ensemble rotates in a unitary direction (hold
up a basketball and rotate it, and you'll see this principle
illustrated). Magnetism occurs when sufficient numbers of protons
(and/or electrons) are in collective alignment. When they are NOT in
collective alignment, magnetism is absent.
Gravity is monopolar because its accelerating spaceflow
does not contain the **spin component** that defines magnetism (which
BTW is why charged particles are not affected when accelerated by
gravity). "Spin is in" as Bert would say. :-) And on the macro scale,
magnetism's spin component is VIVIDLY outlined in the great looping
prominances on the Sun, each tendril a spinning flux tube, like a
flowing "waterspout" tube looping back in.
The proton, while being a magnetic dipole, is
simultaneously an electrical *anode* in toto because the spaceflow is
collectively INTO it (whereas a flow is AWAY FROM a cathode). If y'all
care to pull up pgs. 3 and 4 of the little webbie site, the relationship
of the proton to the electron in the H atom is illustrated (according to
the CBB model, that is. And metallic H is *good* elecrical conductor
BTW).
Concerning electric flow in a conductor (not to be
confused with electron flows in free space, as in a vacuum tube), but
*electric flow* in a conductor occurs when the electrons of an atomic
lattice lie in a planar or edge-to-edge alignment, sorta like cookies on
a cookie sheet. When a pressure gradient (voltage) is applied across the
atomic lattice, a _PUSH_ force occurs; electron shells transfer their
essence 'bucket brigade' style "downstream", impelled by higher pressure
from "upstream". While this *electric flow* is occuring, the individual
electrons remain largely in place in the lattice (whereas in chemical
batteries, actual flow of ions occurs).
So look at this planar-alignment basis of electric flow
in a conductor, and notice how the *magnetic axis* stands perpendicular
to the plane of electric flow. When you 'get' this 90 degree
relationship between electric flow and magnetic polarity, you begin to
see the basis of electromagnetism itself and the mechanism that drives
Maxwell's oscillating E and H fields, propagating at their fixed
velocity through the VERY REAL matrix of the spatial medium.

Under any flowing-space model of gravity (not just the CBB's), the
Inflow constituting what we call the strong nuclear force is one and the
same Flow that more distally is called gravity (Lindner's 'Hadronic
flow'). Herein lies unification of gravity and the SNF.
The seat of the SNF within each proton is the genesis of the spin
component of (hadronic) magnetism. Herein lies unification of magnetism
with the SNF and with gravity. The 90 degree relationship between
electric flow and magnetism unifies the Four Forces in Wolter's 'Unified
Field of Spatial Flows'. As mentioned in past years, he did not include
the Weak force because he considered it a subset of the SNF.

(And this hasn't even gotten into the sub-Planckian
domain of bipolar 'granulons' which elucidates the basis of #2 of the
"cardinal points" - WHY EM radiation has no perceptible upper amplitude
limit.)

Knockin' off for brevity --