![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hey maybe it's analogous to the "seashell effect", the subtle 'roar of
the sea' you hear when you put a seashell to your ear. Should be interesting to hear what the relic gravitational-wave background radiation (GWBR) will sound like. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
oc Shame on you Gravity makes no noise. Has no waves,or field. Sea
shell noise is well understood. TreBert |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bert, gravity and 'gravitational waves', although intimately related,
are two distinctly different critters (although db may disagree:-_). |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
oc I detect no gravity waves. I could have saved those poor *******s
over 100 million bucks looking for these non existing waves. People just do not listen to this clever old man. I know what Aristotle went through once he hit 70 Sad but true TreBert |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bert wrote,
I detect no (gravitational) waves. I could have saved those poor *******s over 100 million bucks looking for these non existing waves. Yeah, since LIGO, VIRGO and the proposed space-based LISA are designed to detect *transversely-polarized* waves, won't it be embarrassin' to find such signals non-existant... because real GWs are in fact longitudinally polarized. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
oc Very good thinking Reality is going out to find gravity waves will
always be the same as my Rudy trying to catch her own tail. It begs this question When moon lines up with the Sun and at that time if there were gravity waves we should detect them since the gravitation force has now more than doubled. We do not detect them,but we do detect the Earth'"s ocean waters stretched(highest tide) in their direction. My no waves for gravity becomes reality because of this. TreBert |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 10, 3:00*pm, (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:
oc *I detect no gravity waves. I could have saved those poor *******s over 100 million bucks looking for these non existing waves. People just do not listen to this clever old man. I know what Aristotle went through once he hit 70 * *Sad but true *TreBert It's pretty damn hard to detect a gravity wave and it's subsequent frequency of 1/c = 3.33564e-9 hz Worse yet if it's 1/c2 = 1.11265e-17 hz ~ BG |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 11, 7:21*am, (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:
oc *Very good thinking *Reality is going out to find gravity waves will always be the same as my Rudy trying to catch her own tail. *It begs this question *When moon lines up with the Sun and at that time if there were gravity waves we should detect them since the gravitation force has now more than doubled. We do not detect them,but we do detect the Earth'"s ocean waters stretched(highest tide) in their direction. My no waves for gravity becomes reality because of this. *TreBert We'd know tonnes more if we had a platform of science instruments parked within the Selene L1 halo. Perhaps China or India will take pity and help us out. ~ BG |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
cosmic radio noise | John[_21_] | Misc | 3 | January 11th 09 05:25 PM |
Still lower noise radio astronomy (was: low-noise amplifiers for radio astronomy ) | Steve Willner | Research | 1 | September 24th 06 11:41 AM |
Still lower noise radio astronomy (was: low-noise amplifiers for radio astronomy ) | George Dishman | Research | 25 | September 17th 06 08:42 AM |
Still lower noise radio astronomy (was: low-noise amplifiers for radio astronomy ) | Steve Willner | Research | 0 | September 15th 06 10:40 AM |
Still lower noise radio astronomy (was: low-noise amplifiers for radio astronomy ) | George Dishman | Research | 1 | September 5th 06 10:12 AM |