![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Abrigon Gusiq wrote:
Was not one of the problems with the whole Shuttle program was it was a compromise between several agencies needs and wants? Not as much as some would have you believe. Shuttle was already evolving in it's current direction even before NASA started courting other customers. Had NASA built their alternative Shuttle, basically a 75% scale model of the current one, they'd have been even worse off because it wouldn't actually be able to do anything useful. Wild that there is talk about reviving the Buran the Soviet Shuttle. http://www.russiatoday.com/scitech/news/33330 Wild talk is all it is and all it will ever be. D. -- Touch-twice life. Eat. Drink. Laugh. http://derekl1963.livejournal.com/ -Resolved: To be more temperate in my postings. Oct 5th, 2004 JDL |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
act of kindness for the new year and in honor of Columbia PLS. BUY COLUMBIA PARTS AND COLUMBIA BODY PARTS OFF THE INTERNET | NikaMS1 | History | 17 | January 6th 05 08:48 AM |
Lox safety | Peter Fairbrother | Policy | 7 | November 17th 04 02:50 PM |
Pre-Columbia Criticism of NASA's Safety Culture in the late 1990's | Greg Kuperberg | Space Shuttle | 68 | September 18th 03 02:35 PM |
Pre-Columbia Criticism of NASA’s “Safety Culture” in the late 1990’s: | jeff findley | Space Shuttle | 2 | September 1st 03 04:50 AM |
TV REVIEW: 'COLUMBIA: FINAL MISSION'- Unheeded Concerns and the Columbia Disaster | Lynndel Humphreys | Space Shuttle | 0 | July 7th 03 01:50 PM |