The Motion of the Perihelion of Mercury

On Dec 29, 11:45 pm, Eric Gisse wrote:
On Dec 29, 9:41 pm, Koobee Wublee wrote:

Short memory? You have been told that the following and the
Schwarzschild metric are ones among an infinite solutions to the
Einstein field equations that are static, spherically symmetric, and
asymptotically flat.

ds^2 = c^2 T dt^2 / (1 + 2 K / r) – (1 + 2 K / r) dr^2 – (r + K)^2
dO^2

Where

** K, T = Constants
** dO^2 = cos^2(Latitude) dLongitude^2 + dLatitude^2

My memory is fine. Yours, though, is quite ****ed.

Back in July of 2007 I gave the explicit coordinate transformation
between your "different" solution and Schwarzschild:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...sg/5e4cf198adb...

You still don’t get it. All tensors are matrices. There are indeed
an infinite number of solutions to the field equations. These are
basic mathematical axioms. shrug

Which you promptly ignored / forgot.

You then repeated the same idiocy in May of this year:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...sg/92d926cce89...

Hmmm... What I have written down is correct. shrug

Funny how you keep repeating the same idiotic and wrong things over,
and over, and over, and over...

Besides, you didn't show that this "different solution" makes a
different prediction. You are unable to do anything but copy and paste
out of textbooks, as you can't even do a simple area calculation from
a given metric.

Don’t blame your low intellects on me. Try do that to your parents.
shrug

Again, notice this solution does not manifest black holes. shrug

Oh, is this another one of your "by inspection" routines? Like how you
think you can see there is curvature "by inspection"?

The equation above does not manifest black holes. You are still
hopelessly lost as usual. shrug

With inability to learn, that explains why you remain a multi-year
super-senior today? Apparently, that free money the state of Alaska
provides must go a long way for you.

I'm not the one who can't follow a basic derivation of Birkhoff's
theorem.

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...rowse_frm/thre...

You are the one who believes in the nonsense of Birkhoff’s theorem.
shrug

I'm not the one who can't follow through the simplest steps of
deriving the field equations.

You are the one who cannot follow the mathematics involved. shrug

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...rowse_frm/thre...

I'm not the one who thinks you can determine curvature by inspection.

Well, I am, and you should be too. No one can determine curvature
just by inspection. shrug

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...sg/65e5819e6e0...

I'm not the one who does not believe in differential equation
uniqueness theorems.

The differential equations represented by the field equations yield an
infinite number of solutions. Just how many time do I have to tell
you before your imbecile brain finally get it?

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...ea4c5a50?dmode...

I'm not the one who has repeatedly claimed that you can introduce
curvature with a coordinate transformation.

I am not, either. shrug

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...sg/ce55cde7fd5...
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...sg/a45d3eba38f...

I'm not the one who doesn't understand basic notation, what a tensor
is, what proper time is, etc etc and ETC.

What is that all about?

Inability to learn INDEED.

I think you are under the influence of narcotics. shrug

That explains why you remain a multi-year super-senior.