A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Relativity FAQ



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 8th 03, 05:23 PM
Repeating Rifle
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Relativity FAQ

in article , Nathan Jones at
ics wrote on 12/7/03 3:19 PM:

Dear reader,
I have noticed that more than a few of you are having trouble understanding
Einsteins special relativity and general relativity principles. I am going
to be writing another FAQ this one specifically on the Einstein absurdities
and paradox's. Post your queries now and I will consider them for you and if
they are meritable they will be included in the FAQ to be released in a few
weeks or so.

Nathan Jones Physicst.


I have come up with an easy way to explain distance shortening in uniformly
moving systems. It is based upon work by Richard Feynman that actually got
into a NOVA episode. He readilly explained the twin paradox.

Essentially, he made a clock out of a Fabry-Perot interferometer--a laser
resonator if you prefer. A pulse of light bounces back and forth between the
mirrors. It is clear that the light path, and consequently the period, is
increased in the moving system over that of the stationary twin (your)
system.

___ ___ ___
\ / \ / \
\ / \ / \ /
\ / \ / \ /
\ / \ / \ /
--- --- ---

It should be clear that it takes longer to get things done in the moving
system. Straightforward geometric calculations will give the relativisticly
correct period for the moving clock as well as for the age of the moving
twin. Note that the moving twin will age at the same rate independent of the
direction of motion.

These conclusions depend upon the fundamental postulates of special
relativity. The laws of physics are the same in any uniformly moving system.
This includes the speed of light. The conclusions you draw are then correct
no matter how unlikely you may think the are. (Paraphrased from Sherlock
Holmes.)

In some way things are experimentally easier now then when Einstein worked
on this problem. Information exchanged between systems on lengths and
measures can no be described in atomic terms. These include periods of
cesium oscillations for and wavelengths light for distance. Distortions from
doppler shifts and the like no longer have to be compensated.

Bill







 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Popping The Big Bang Jim Greenfield Astronomy Misc 701 July 8th 07 05:40 PM
4-D in Relativity (was Moi) G EddieA95 Science 0 November 11th 03 07:00 AM
Saturn-Bound Spacecraft Tests Einstein's Theory Ron Baalke Astronomy Misc 1 October 3rd 03 06:31 PM
Saturn-Bound Spacecraft Tests Einstein's Theory Ron Baalke Science 0 October 3rd 03 01:16 AM
Relativity of microwave background radiation map George Buyanovsky Science 1 September 1st 03 02:30 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.