|
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
December 4th 03, 11:47 PM
|
|||
|
|||
We'll see who went where eh?
Dear Nathan Jones:
"Bring it on'" wrote in message ... -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 THE APOLLO HOAX FAQ version 4.1 - November 2003 Written by Nathan Jones Usual pointless, thoughtless crap. Unedited, without thought one about the glaring errors already pointed out. Be sure and send him money. He obviously needs the cash. Maybe he could buy a clue! David A. Smith 
|
|
#2
December 5th 03, 12:46 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
We'll see who went where eh?
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 16:47:41 -0700, \(formerly\)"
dlzc1.cox@net wrote: Dear Nathan Jones: "Bring it on'" wrote in message ... -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 THE APOLLO HOAX FAQ version 4.1 - November 2003 Written by Nathan Jones Usual pointless, thoughtless crap. Unedited, without thought one about the glaring errors already pointed out. Be sure and send him money. He obviously needs the cash. Maybe he could buy a clue! David A. Smith You know, assuming that the US *does* go *back* (yes, BACK) to the Moon, one wonders what these morons will do to keep their mental acrobatics going. They will probably claim, "oh, sure, we can do it now, but not then" -- Find out about Australia's most dangerous Doomsday Cult: http://users.bigpond.net.au/wanglese/pebble.htm "You can't fool me, it's turtles all the way down."
|
|
#3
December 5th 03, 12:55 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
We'll see who went where eh?
Wally Anglesea™ wrote in
sci.astro: You know, assuming that the US *does* go *back* (yes, BACK) to the Moon, one wonders what these morons will do to keep their mental acrobatics going. Why should one be interested in acrobatics of a twit at all? They will probably claim, "oh, sure, we can do it now, but not then" They sure will circumvent my killfile through kind cooperation of the people who feel obliged to counter new claims of these twits. Clear skies, -- CeeBee "I am not a crook" Google CeeBee @ www.geocities.com/ceebee_2
|
|
#4
December 5th 03, 01:08 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
We'll see who went where eh?
"Wally AngleseaT" wrote in message ... On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 16:47:41 -0700, \(formerly\)" dlzc1.cox@net wrote: Dear Nathan Jones: "Bring it on'" wrote in message ... -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 THE APOLLO HOAX FAQ version 4.1 - November 2003 Written by Nathan Jones Usual pointless, thoughtless crap. Unedited, without thought one about the glaring errors already pointed out. Be sure and send him money. He obviously needs the cash. Maybe he could buy a clue! David A. Smith You know, assuming that the US *does* go *back* (yes, BACK) to the Moon, one wonders what these morons will do to keep their mental acrobatics going. They will probably claim, "oh, sure, we can do it now, but not then" One has to wonder how they will explain away the footprints left by the first astronauts. -- Find out about Australia's most dangerous Doomsday Cult: http://users.bigpond.net.au/wanglese/pebble.htm "You can't fool me, it's turtles all the way down."
|
|
#5
December 5th 03, 04:14 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
We'll see who went where eh?
Dear The Ancient One:
"The Ancient One" wrote in message ... "Wally AngleseaT" wrote in message ... .... Be sure and send him money. He obviously needs the cash. Maybe he could buy a clue! You know, assuming that the US *does* go *back* (yes, BACK) to the Moon, one wonders what these morons will do to keep their mental acrobatics going. They will probably claim, "oh, sure, we can do it now, but not then" One has to wonder how they will explain away the footprints left by the first astronauts. They took plaster casts with them, and made the "old" footprints. Just like hoaxers do with the Yeti. But they will get quieter... David A. Smith
|
|
#6
December 5th 03, 02:22 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
We'll see who went where eh?
"Bring it on'" wrote in message ... Subject: (21) Photographic anomalies, heiligenschein, shadows and perspective. You haven't updated it with the full explanation of why "buzz's boot" photo is extremely easy to explain as it was lit up by armstrong's suit.
|
|
#7
December 8th 03, 06:30 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
We'll see who went where eh?
"Bring it on'" wrote in message
... -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 THE APOLLO HOAX FAQ version 4.1 - November 2003 Written by Nathan Jones Subject: (3) What does it take to prove we went to the Moon? I would remind the reader that It's up to scientists and claimants of this or that fact to provide proof of their claims. Excuse me dipstick, but it would be up to the person making the extraordinary claim (in this case that would be the "pseudo" scientists. to provide the proof... in any debate where evidence to support an argument against the status quo is inadequate, the status quo wins.
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
