![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thierry Forveille wrote:
Is anyone on the list aware of uses of the MD5 checksum in FITS beyond protection against accidental bitflips from bad hardware? Good question! If the goal is to protect against data accidents (whatever the cause), the FITS checksum should be considered as a strong contender instead of any secure hash. That said, MD5 is used by default for many astronomical data transport and archive chores. As the broader computing communities continue to transition to SHA-2, support for MD5-based utilities will narrow. Remediating this is certainly not a top priority, however, which is why I worded it as a "reminder" :-) When implementing new systems, there are few good arguments for choosing MD5. Rob |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[fitsbits] Hash Functions (MD5 is very obsolete) | Rob Seaman | FITS | 0 | July 8th 08 02:25 PM |
Luminosity Functions | Steve Willner | Research | 0 | September 1st 07 08:47 AM |
Luminosity Functions | PoorRichard | Research | 5 | August 30th 07 08:43 AM |
Luminosity Functions | Steve Willner | Research | 1 | August 24th 07 09:07 AM |
integration of jacobian elliptical functions | Hannu Poropudas | Astronomy Misc | 0 | August 4th 07 07:49 PM |