The Asstronots would have fried (375rem/day)

"Nathan Jones" wrote in message
...
|
| What rubbish. I shant even bother explaining why your message
| is rubbish, you obviously wouldn't understand or learn anything.

What a pity, because his message reflects the understanding of the multi
billion dollar aerospace industry. During my conversations with you over
the past several months, it always seems to be you that stand in need of
learning. Especially on this point, where you are contradicted by eminent
experts -- including the man whose name is synonymous with the study of
cislunar radiation -- it seems inappriopriate for you to so callously
dismiss this opinion.

| There is no need for me to prove what has already been proven/shown.

David Wozney's ignorant and self-contradictory prediction is not proof.
Proof would be data from actual measured solar activity from the period
1969-1972 correlated with the Apollo missions. I have that data. Do you?
Does Wozney? Wozney dazzles you with alarming quotes and strings together
unrelated facts to form a model of solar activity. Then, because the
profile of Apollo mission planning does not match his model, he rejects the
validity of the missions.

BUT AT NO TIME does he give any evidence that his model actually predicts
the solar activity that was ACTUALLY measured -- by several countries --
during the Apollo operational period. In fact, it doesn't. In fact, he's
off by several orders of magnitude.

No small wonder, then, that Wozney won't defend his findings. The only
wonder remaining is why you seem to keep relying upon them in the fact of so
much evidence to the contrary.

--
|
The universe is not required to conform | Jay Windley
to the expectations of the ignorant. | webmaster @ clavius.org