![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Steve Campbell" Does anyone have any ideas at all as to what may have been going on, because we ) myself and the other witness) are bother starting to think we may be insane ![]() How fast was this "point" (meteor?) moving? As quickly as a "normal" meteor or slower? At first impression I would think it was a satellite but you seem to have considered that. I don't think the recent solar activity would have anything to do with the ionization process of an entering meteoroid. It may even enhance the ionization process. No all meteors leave a train. This is often persistence of vision that gives you the impression of a train. Ed Majden http://members.shaw.ca/epmajden/index.htm |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ed Majden wrote:
How fast was this "point" (meteor?) moving? As quickly as a "normal" meteor or slower? At first impression I would think it was a satellite but you seem to have considered that. I don't think the recent solar activity would have anything to do with the ionization process of an entering meteoroid. It may even enhance the ionization process. No all meteors leave a train. This is often persistence of vision that gives you the impression of a train. I'd say it was travelling at the same speed as a normal meteor, or VERY slightly slower, though that slight slowness may be to do with the unusual ( for me to witness) near vertical path. The best way I can describe it is as a "shooting star", in a quite literal ( visually obviously) sense. It just looked like an object of slightly dimmer magnitude than venus had decided to pop into existence, hurtle down for a second or so leaving no trail or wake and then cease to be. The only other thing to note was that it was VERY white in colour. It did look more than anything like a satellite, quite a large one, or a good reflection from big solar panels, but the speed was FAR too high, I doubt even an object in the lowest possible stable orbit would travel that fast, though I may well be wrong. Perhaps the fact that the first glow of dawn was visible just rendered the trail invisible, but that area of the sky was only just beginning to show signs of not being night time any more. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Steve Campbell" I'd say it was travelling at the same speed as a normal meteor, or VERY slightly slower, though that slight slowness may be to do with the unusual ( for me to witness) near vertical path. It did look more than anything like a satellite, quite a large one, or a good reflection from big solar panels, but the speed was FAR too high, I doubt even an object in the lowest possible stable orbit would travel that fast, though I may well be wrong. Steve: Have you looked at the "Heavens Above" web site? They provide satellite predictions for your location. Perhaps you could correlate the time of your observation to one of the satellite transits. It may be worth a look. Ed |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ed Majden wrote:
"Steve Campbell" I'd say it was travelling at the same speed as a normal meteor, or VERY slightly slower, though that slight slowness may be to do with the unusual ( for me to witness) near vertical path. It did look more than anything like a satellite, quite a large one, or a good reflection from big solar panels, but the speed was FAR too high, I doubt even an object in the lowest possible stable orbit would travel that fast, though I may well be wrong. Steve: Have you looked at the "Heavens Above" web site? They provide satellite predictions for your location. Perhaps you could correlate the time of your observation to one of the satellite transits. It may be worth a look. Ed Thanks Ed, I'll look into that, hopefully it will provide an explanation. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
posted & mailed
Steve Campbell wrote: Steve: Have you looked at the "Heavens Above" web site? They provide satellite predictions for your location. Perhaps you could correlate the time of your observation to one of the satellite transits. It may be worth a look. Ed Thanks Ed, I'll look into that, hopefully it will provide an explanation. Nope, i had a look and there was nothihng around that this could have been. At least I am not a Kook, and am not about to start claiming little green men ![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The 2003 Leonid Meteor Shower | Ron Baalke | Astronomy Misc | 8 | October 12th 03 07:24 AM |
Wales Fireball Image NOT a Meteor ?!? | James Oberg | Technology | 3 | October 11th 03 03:02 AM |
September NYC Event 3/ 7 | JOHN PAZMINO | Astronomy Misc | 0 | September 3rd 03 04:40 AM |
Tethered free flying wings | Pete Lynn | Policy | 6 | August 9th 03 09:16 AM |
August NYC Events 3/ 7 | JOHN PAZMINO | Astronomy Misc | 0 | July 31st 03 03:29 AM |