![]() |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 28, 7:03*pm, Les Desser wrote:
In article , OG Fri, 25 Apr 2008 20:15:39 writes "Les Desser" wrote in message ... I am preparing a presentation on the Equation of Time and have been trying to find a clear description, preferable with diagrams, of the adjustment due to obliquity. The explanation at the National Maritime Museum http://www.nmm.ac.uk/server/show/conWebDoc.351 only makes sense if you already know the answer ![]() The best I could find was the page at http://www.wallingfordclock.talktalk.net/Sidereal%20Time.htm but I still find it inadequate. The example of the bus going down the incline is good to show the slowdown but I cannot find anything appropriate to explain the speeding up. Has anyone seen and better presented explanations? Does this have what you're looking for http://www.analemma.com/ ? Thanks - that looks very interesting. -- Les Desser (The Reply-to address IS valid)- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I have to laugh,many look down at the Americans with the minority of creationists who live there whereas on this side of the ocean there are those who are full blown astrologers - http://www.math.nus.edu.sg/aslaksen/...lemmaCurve.gif The Equation of Time is a global correction applied to the total length of the natural noon cycle,to believe that there is some sort of hemispherical variable axial inclination involved,hence the analemma hoax, is basically to be on intellectual par with a flat Earther.The analemma must be some sort of eccentric English joke ,in which case,it is not funny anymore but I would'nt spend too long trying to convince the English on it insofar as the treatise of Huygens on the Equation of Time and what it does sets the standard against which any alternative view can be compared. For goodness sake,what is it that makes people believe in an astrological framework with a value for axial rotation through 360 degrees in 23 hours 56 minutes 04 seconds !!!,Does anybody here understand that it is even below the level of creationist thinking or rather,do they noit understand the basic transfer of the 24 hour day to the axial cycle as a constant but not as an observance as the solar/sidereal ficvtion has it - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:T...3%A9reo.en.png This is not the first time you lot disgraced your nation,the King had to intervene in the matter of Harrison's rightful resolution for determination of longitudes using his clock (which of course involves the Equation of Time principles) but now the situation is far,far worse.I do not mind that you fraks betray your natiion,if you wish to believe in the solar/sidereal fiction above then that is either madness or eccentricity however that type of reasoning places an incredible obstacle to productive work due to its astrological foundations. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A contemporary look at the Equation of Time | oriel36 | Amateur Astronomy | 4 | August 6th 06 11:04 AM |
Equation of Time causes | oriel36 | Amateur Astronomy | 1 | May 23rd 06 05:18 AM |
Newton's comment on the Equation of Time | [email protected] | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | June 30th 05 12:05 PM |
Equation of time: need the equation itself | [email protected] | Misc | 1 | March 10th 05 05:02 AM |
analemma and equation of time: when first understood | mack | Amateur Astronomy | 5 | August 31st 04 12:36 AM |