Entire NASA Safety Panel Resigns!

On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 01:21:19 GMT, Rudolph_X
wrote:

All along, I suspected that they did a 'white-wash', 'cover-up job' when
they failed to mention the 'alien death ray' that struck the shuttle
before it went down. Also, the photos of the 'blue electircal bolt' seen
striking the shuttle just before it crashed, seem to have mysteriously
disapeared. No one ever mentioned the photos, and the photos were never
released for public viewing. What happened? A cover up?

Congress, also, is not satisfied with panel's conclusions either.
Something stinks in NASA!

http://edition.cnn.com/2003/TECH/spa....ap/index.html



Hey Rudolph, Why can't anyone find this fictitious NSA in St
Petersburg?

OK, So far, I've been told that *THERE IS NO NSA IN ST PETERSBURG,
MUCH LESS A DEPT OF UFO RESEARCH, AND CERTAINLY NOT ONE THAT REPORTS
TO PUTIN

Looks like your sources were stoooooopppid again!!!

--
For the Truth about Planet X,
Phil Plait's excellent summary:
http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/misc/planetx/index.html

Wally Anglesea^(TM) wrote:

On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 01:21:19 GMT, Rudolph_X
wrote:



All along, I suspected that they did a 'white-wash', 'cover-up job' when
they failed to mention the 'alien death ray' that struck the shuttle
before it went down. Also, the photos of the 'blue electircal bolt' seen
striking the shuttle just before it crashed, seem to have mysteriously
disapeared. No one ever mentioned the photos, and the photos were never
released for public viewing. What happened? A cover up?

Congress, also, is not satisfied with panel's conclusions either.
Something stinks in NASA!

http://edition.cnn.com/2003/TECH/spa....ap/index.html





Hey Rudolph, Why can't anyone find this fictitious NSA in St
Petersburg?

OK, So far, I've been told that *THERE IS NO NSA IN ST PETERSBURG,
MUCH LESS A DEPT OF UFO RESEARCH, AND CERTAINLY NOT ONE THAT REPORTS
TO PUTIN

Looks like your sources were stoooooopppid again!!!

--
For the Truth about Planet X,
Phil Plait's excellent summary:
http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/misc/planetx/index.html

Did you hear the one about the Chinese lumberjack's x-rated ET encounter?

Seems that Chinese also have a similar 'official' UFO governmental
agency. Read the artice from Time magazine.

http://www.time.com/time/asia/magazi...8900%2C00.html

Now try and tell us that the official UFO governmental agency in China
doesn't exist. No, you won't do that. (Just, watch folks, this is where
Wally turns into a heckler, avoids the issue and starts with his
personal attacks.)

If you can't debunk the Chinese official governmental UFO agency, why
should we believe that you can debunk the officical Russian UFO agency?
Indeed, many other countries throughout the world also have similar
official governmental agencies. However, the USA is still in the 'stone
ages' when it comes to these kinds of forward looking scientific
organizations. (Probably because its currently under the sway of the
religious right, huh?) Here in the USA even though a majority of the
population believes in UFOs, our government is still, apparently,
blatantly maintaining the cover-up.

On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 07:56:23 GMT, Rudolph_X
wrote:



Wally Anglesea^(TM) wrote:

On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 01:21:19 GMT, Rudolph_X
wrote:



All along, I suspected that they did a 'white-wash', 'cover-up job' when
they failed to mention the 'alien death ray' that struck the shuttle
before it went down. Also, the photos of the 'blue electircal bolt' seen
striking the shuttle just before it crashed, seem to have mysteriously
disapeared. No one ever mentioned the photos, and the photos were never
released for public viewing. What happened? A cover up?

Congress, also, is not satisfied with panel's conclusions either.
Something stinks in NASA!

http://edition.cnn.com/2003/TECH/spa....ap/index.html





Hey Rudolph, Why can't anyone find this fictitious NSA in St
Petersburg?

OK, So far, I've been told that *THERE IS NO NSA IN ST PETERSBURG,
MUCH LESS A DEPT OF UFO RESEARCH, AND CERTAINLY NOT ONE THAT REPORTS
TO PUTIN

Looks like your sources were stoooooopppid again!!!

--
For the Truth about Planet X,
Phil Plait's excellent summary:
http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/misc/planetx/index.html

Did you hear the one about the Chinese lumberjack's x-rated ET encounter?

Yeah, and I'll pu it in the skeptical basket till it gets
investigated. Right now, I'm trying to verify your sources that
claimed some non-eixistent Russian claims something about a UFO.
Start making up your excuses now.


Seems that Chinese also have a similar 'official' UFO governmental
agency. Read the artice from Time magazine.

http://www.time.com/time/asia/magazi...8900%2C00.html

Now try and tell us that the official UFO governmental agency in China
doesn't exist. No, you won't do that. (Just, watch folks, this is where

NO, I'll get round to that one if I get the time. Right now, we are
discussing your Russian claims.



Wally turns into a heckler, avoids the issue and starts with his
personal attacks.)

Well, as far as you are concerned, it save a whole lot of time,
nitwit.



NO, I'm calling YOU, and your reliance on NEXUS. I'm not discussing
China, I want you explanation of using a non existent RUSSIAN
organisation to bolster you claims, nitwit.




If you can't debunk the Chinese official governmental UFO agency, why
should we believe that you can debunk the officical Russian UFO agency?

Are you *really* that stupid?


I guess you must be.




--
For the Truth about Planet X,
Phil Plait's excellent summary:
http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/misc/planetx/index.html

Wally Anglesea^(TM) wrote:

On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 07:56:23 GMT, Rudolph_X
wrote:



Wally Anglesea^(TM) wrote:



On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 01:21:19 GMT, Rudolph_X
wrote:





All along, I suspected that they did a 'white-wash', 'cover-up job' when
they failed to mention the 'alien death ray' that struck the shuttle
before it went down. Also, the photos of the 'blue electircal bolt' seen
striking the shuttle just before it crashed, seem to have mysteriously
disapeared. No one ever mentioned the photos, and the photos were never
released for public viewing. What happened? A cover up?

Congress, also, is not satisfied with panel's conclusions either.
Something stinks in NASA!

http://edition.cnn.com/2003/TECH/spa....ap/index.html





Hey Rudolph, Why can't anyone find this fictitious NSA in St
Petersburg?

OK, So far, I've been told that *THERE IS NO NSA IN ST PETERSBURG,
MUCH LESS A DEPT OF UFO RESEARCH, AND CERTAINLY NOT ONE THAT REPORTS
TO PUTIN

Looks like your sources were stoooooopppid again!!!

--
For the Truth about Planet X,
Phil Plait's excellent summary:
http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/misc/planetx/index.html



Did you hear the one about the Chinese lumberjack's x-rated ET encounter?



Yeah, and I'll pu it in the skeptical basket till it gets
investigated. Right now, I'm trying to verify your sources that
claimed some non-eixistent Russian claims something about a UFO.
Start making up your excuses now.



Seems that Chinese also have a similar 'official' UFO governmental
agency. Read the artice from Time magazine.

http://www.time.com/time/asia/magazi...8900%2C00.html

Now try and tell us that the official UFO governmental agency in China
doesn't exist. No, you won't do that. (Just, watch folks, this is where



NO, I'll get round to that one if I get the time. Right now, we are
discussing your Russian claims.





Wally turns into a heckler, avoids the issue and starts with his
personal attacks.)



Well, as far as you are concerned, it save a whole lot of time,
nitwit.



NO, I'm calling YOU, and your reliance on NEXUS. I'm not discussing
China, I want you explanation of using a non existent RUSSIAN
organisation to bolster you claims, nitwit.





If you can't debunk the Chinese official governmental UFO agency, why
should we believe that you can debunk the officical Russian UFO agency?



Are you *really* that stupid?


I guess you must be.




You can say what you like, Wally. But, you should understand by now that
people are different, in more ways than you can imagine. The great
diversity of mankind is what helps to insure our survival as a species.
We should celebrate our diversity, not condem other folks for being
different from us. For example, in India, we have an official government
minister taking a position similar to that taken by the Chinese, the
Russians, and so many other governments throughout the world...

http://www.rense.com/general42/indianministerscall.htm

The human potential is virtually unlimited... What irks me about some of
the debunkers on sci.astro is that they continually seek to belittle
mankind's tremendous evolutionary potential. Wally, you need to learn
how to 'think big'!

"Rudolph_X" wrote in message
...

snip

[RX]You can say what you like, Wally. But, you should understand by now that
people are different, in more ways than you can imagine. The great diversity
of mankind is what helps to insure our survival as a species. We should
celebrate our diversity, not condem other folks for being different from us.
For example, in India, we have an official government minister taking a
position similar to that taken by the Chinese, the Russians, and so many
other governments throughout the world...

http://www.rense.com/general42/indianministerscall.htm

The human potential is virtually unlimited... What irks me about some of the
debunkers on sci.astro is that they continually seek to belittle mankind's
tremendous evolutionary potential. Wally, you need to learn how to 'think
big'!

Rudy,

Yes, you make it clear with every post that you purposely post off-topic
here. You were directed to the FAQ that outlined what is and what isn't
on-topic on sci.astro; and I even reproduced the main element of it in a
post to you. You, living in your own world, feel free to make up your own
rules, and then expect people to abide by them.

Now go away before I taunt you one more time.

Tom McDonald
remove 'nohormel' to reply

On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 01:34:15 GMT, Rudolph_X
wrote:

SNIP


The human potential is virtually unlimited... What irks me about some of
the debunkers on sci.astro is that they continually seek to belittle
mankind's tremendous evolutionary potential. Wally, you need to learn
how to 'think big'!

You need to learn how to think.

It loks like one of your sources is about to be shown up as
stooooooopid. (nexus magazine of course)

Again.


--
For the Truth about Planet X,
Phil Plait's excellent summary:
http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/misc/planetx/index.html