Electric Gravity&Instantaneous Light

Charles, in case you haven't looked recently, the Subject title of this
thread is "Electric Gravity&Instantaneous Light" and I refer to you the
Sandsbury IFS part of the Subject "Instantaneous Light" which is the really
stupid part. Ralphie IFS, is a well known kook on SCI.OPTICS as he spent
several months trying to get us to believe his nonsense of how light goes
from one place to another instantly but yet takes time to be converted into
another form of information at the far end. The ultimate farcial end of
this was a long argument as to how radio waves (long wave versions of light)
were instantly adsorbed by an antenna that wan't even pointed as one of the
Pioneer spacecraft and then that data gest spit into the following
electronics some 20 hours or so later.
It is all Information Free Sciensce so go away and stop bothering the
practical engineering that is SCI.OPTICS. We aren't interested in your
stupidities.
Trying to point me towards alt.flame is purely a waste of time on your part
as you have noticed from this post.
--
Bob May
Losing weight is easy! If you ever want to lose weight, eat and drink less.
Works evevery time it is tried!

From the small mind of Charles Cagle

First of all, loon, no one said light travels instantaneously from
place to place. This means that you can't read too well or that at
least you lack the intellect to grasp what is being written. My
suggestion is that you don't make the attempt since you've proven
yourself too stupid to do it correctly. Second of all, you don't know
the difference between a theory and a model. Third, you don't speak
for anyone but yourself at sci.optics and the fact that you think you
do and so state makes me want to post every post with a trailer leading over
to sci.optics even if the subject was knitting. If any of your
nitwit friends at sci.optics happen to agree with you then you
shouldn't pre-empt their postings. Let them post their own whinings.
But in the meantime until you get a signed document declaring that all
who sign it are the entire group of people who read sci.optics then you
should consider that you don't speak for them all. Quit trying.
Fourth, besides being a loon you're trying to be a net kop and that
doesn't work with me. Fifth, you first said that you are bothered and
then you say you're not. You can't get your story straight. The
problem is that you are bothered. It ****es you off, you loonish net
kop, to think that someone might post a post that you think is off
topic. Too bad. Live with it you squeeky mouse.

Last, you're so used to the pseudophysics of the mainstream physics
community that you are not fit to judge what is reasonable physics with
respect to what is not since you've obviously adopted much that isn't
already with your witless nodding in agreement to all that the
mainstream pseudoscientists tell you. You're main problem is that you
need to get both manners and a brain. You're mother should have helped
with the first but since she didn't that means that you came from a low
class family environment. No one taught her so she couldn't teach you.
If you aren't trailer trash by birth then you've made yourself that way
by ignoring what you should have been and probably were taught when
young. Now finally we come to the part where you need to get a brain.
No doubt you have one but the sad reality is that you haven't a clue
about how to use it so getting another one would do you any good at
all. You're screwed and there's no way out for you. It's best you
keep your mouth shut so as to avoid showing the portion of the world
that reads some of these newsgroups what a jackass you really are.

Now **** off, Bob, go back to your little corner and quit whining.

CC

In article , Bob May
wrote:

Trying to point me towards alt.flame is purely a waste of time on your part
as you have noticed from this post.

It probably worked alright and you never noticed.