![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Aditya Naredi wrote:
Hi everyone, A few days back I heard from my hometown in India that people observed a 'northern shift' of Sun during sunrise. This happened around July 17th (2003). Unbelievable as it seemed, I proceeded to measure it myself as follows.. [snip] Can someone please measure Sun's azimuth at their places and let me know if it differs from calculated azimuth or not? If it is, what are the possible explanations? If not, what am I doing wrong? The first thing I'd suspect is that the sunrise positions you looked up were just the "geometrical" azimuths. Atmospheric refraction and other effects not included in such figures can make a very large difference to the observed position. Moreover, I imagine that looking north-east from Seattle the horizon is pretty mountainous; you might do better trying to observe sunsets over the Juan de Fuca Strait. -- Odysseus |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Aditya Naredi ) writes:
Hi everyone, A few days back I heard from my hometown in India that people observed a 'northern shift' of Sun during sunrise. This happened around July 17th (2003). Unbelievable as it seemed, I proceeded to measure it myself as follows.. I calculated the angle the shadow of a vertical body made with True North (determined by a compass) at different times and different places in Seattle (USA). I compared this angle (that Sun makes from true north - called 'azimuth') with the calculated angles posted on numerous official and unofficial websites, and I found it differing exactly by 15 degrees. Here are the results: Data: Magnetic declination in Seattle (19 degrees East) Place Seattle, WA USA (122 20 W, 47 38 N) Calculated data taken from the website: http://aa.usno.navy.mil/data/ (US Navy?) I was careful the measurements were taken in a magnetic influence free environment. Date Time Measured Calculated Difference (with True North) (from website) ---------------------------------------------------------------- 07/29/03 15:30PM 235 degrees 250 degrees 15 degrees 07/30/03 10:46AM 124 degrees 140 degrees 16 degrees 08/01/03 16:40PM 250 degrees 264 degrees 14 degrees Obviously the first thing that comes to my mind is that the calculations are wrong (wrong caliberation of compass etc), or direction of Magnetic Pole changed here in Seattle - but since the same difference has been observed in other places too, I don't think that's the case. Can someone please measure Sun's azimuth at their places and let me know if it differs from calculated azimuth or not? If it is, what are the possible explanations? If not, what am I doing wrong? If these observations are correct, it would be interesting to measure measure altitude / azimuth of Polaris. I don't have any instruments to do that right now - am working on it. Would really appreciate your help. Thanks in advance, Aditya Since 15 degrees of longitude is one hour of clock time, did you allow for daylight saving time? --John Park |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for your followups. Please see my comments inlined:
\(formerly\)" dlzc1.cox@net wrote: A compass cannot do true north. It can do magnetic north, and that can be affected by local phenomenon. David A. Smith" I know about that, I adjusted 19 degrees for Seattle's magnetic declination to get true north from magnetic north. Thomas McDonald" wrote I think you might call a local observatory or active amateur astronomer and ask them if their telescope pointing software is laying their telescopes on target would definitely try that. Odysseus wrote in message The first thing I'd suspect is that the sunrise positions you looked up were just the "geometrical" azimuths. Atmospheric refraction and other effects not included in such figures can make a very large difference to the observed position. Moreover, I imagine that looking north-east from Seattle the horizon is pretty mountainous; you might do better trying to observe sunsets over the Juan de Fuca Strait. well, I measured this at different times of the day so its not always sunrise. Atmospheric refraction shouldn't affect this at noon (even if it does in small degrees, it would affect altitude, not azimuth). This also means that I'm not always looking north-east from Seattle (actually its south-west in afternoon). Guys I really appreciate your responses. But did any of you actually try to measure it yourself? I'm 100% sure, you'll notice this difference too. Could you please? That's just 5 minutes out in the Sun! Thanks, Aditya. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Odysseus wrote: Aditya Naredi wrote: Hi everyone, A few days back I heard from my hometown in India that people observed a 'northern shift' of Sun during sunrise. This happened around July 17th (2003). Unbelievable as it seemed, I proceeded to measure it myself as follows.. [snip] Can someone please measure Sun's azimuth at their places and let me know if it differs from calculated azimuth or not? If it is, what are the possible explanations? If not, what am I doing wrong? The first thing I'd suspect is that the sunrise positions you looked up were just the "geometrical" azimuths. Atmospheric refraction and other effects not included in such figures can make a very large difference to the observed position. Moreover, I imagine that looking north-east from Seattle the horizon is pretty mountainous; you might do better trying to observe sunsets over the Juan de Fuca Strait. He didn't measure this at sunrise - check his data: # Data: # Magnetic declination in Seattle (19 degrees East) # Place Seattle, WA USA (122 20 W, 47 38 N) # Calculated data taken from the website: http://aa.usno.navy.mil/data/ # (US Navy?) # # I was careful the measurements were taken in a magnetic influence # free environment. # # Date Time Measured Calculated Difference # (with True North) (from website) # ---------------------------------------------------------------- # 07/29/03 15:30PM 235 degrees 250 degrees 15 degrees # 07/30/03 10:46AM 124 degrees 140 degrees 16 degrees # 08/01/03 16:40PM 250 degrees 264 degrees 14 degrees The Sun doesn't rise, or set, at 15:30PM, 16:40PM or 10:46AM in July at 47 deg N latitude.... Since his discrepancies are all near 15 degrees, my first guess is that he made a "one hour mistake": either forgetting to account for Daylight Savings Time, or by mistake choosing the wrong time zone. -- ---------------------------------------------------------------- Paul Schlyter, Grev Turegatan 40, SE-114 38 Stockholm, SWEDEN e-mail: pausch at stockholm dot bostream dot se WWW: http://www.stjarnhimlen.se/ http://home.tiscali.se/pausch/ |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Aditya Naredi wrote:
well, I measured this at different times of the day so its not always sunrise. Atmospheric refraction shouldn't affect this at noon (even if it does in small degrees, it would affect altitude, not azimuth). This also means that I'm not always looking north-east from Seattle (actually its south-west in afternoon). Sorry, I didn't read your table carefully enough. -- Odysseus |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Spacecraft Doppler&Light Speed Extrapolation | ralph sansbury | Astronomy Misc | 91 | August 1st 13 01:32 PM |
Lunar Cycler - Difference in size between expendable and reusable | Mike Rhino | Policy | 7 | February 2nd 04 07:39 PM |
Difference between american and russian launchrocket technology. | lapzilla | Technology | 3 | October 30th 03 02:36 PM |
Astrology with a Difference...Our predictions as high as 95% | Astrowithadifference | History | 5 | October 2nd 03 11:24 AM |
Deaths In Space; The Difference? | Mark Coultrip | Science | 2 | July 11th 03 06:38 AM |