Japan First Back To The Moon!

On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 08:34:54 -0600, kT puked:

http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/11/20071113_kaguya_e.html

Heh heh heh ... Go JAXA! Go Japan!

Awesome.
--
lab~rat :-)
Do you want polite or do you want sincere?

On Nov 15, 1:09 pm, "lab~rat :-)" wrote:
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 08:34:54 -0600, kT puked:

http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/11/20071113_kaguya_e.html

Heh heh heh ... Go JAXA! Go Japan!

Awesome.
--
lab~rat :-)
Do you want polite or do you want sincere?

Awesome is right.

Did you notice how they'd turned off or rather having excluded any
color saturation of the moon itself, as allowing only those pixels of
Earth being in full color. There's actually a perfectly good reason
for doing that.

If you have a photo processing bit of software, I can tell you what to
look for that's so interesting as to their mission and of its HDTV
imaging, as having to deal with all of that pesky UV, near UV and
violet spectrum of raw solar energy.
--
Brad Guth

On Nov 13, 6:34 am, kT wrote:
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/11/20071113_kaguya_e.html

Heh heh heh ... Go JAXA! Go Japan!

China and Japan not taking another NASA no for an answer.

Qiute oddly there's hardly an honest Usenet word on behalf of the
Chinese moon mission that's closing in on what Japan has as an ongoing
3-satellite observation and science gathering process, that'll each
pick up the slack where the previous US and Russian missions left off.

However, once again and again, it's perfectly clear that our NASA/
Apollo brown-nosed clowns are running their very own Usenet of danmage-
control infomercials fully amock, all because of those original NASA/
Apollo lies and subsequent denials of their being in denial is simply
all too Hitler and/or GW Bush like.

And only because I'm still such a nice guy, we have this following
insignificant contribution by our very own "kT", but we should take
further notice as to how all the usenet lights tend to go out whenever
there's another not so insignificant speck of truth about our moon to
behold.

"Japan First Back To The Moon!" / kT
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.s...8a85929879b6a0

I believe that basic though unusually simple topic entro by kT is
absolutely right on the money, at least Japan being of the first other
than Russian or those of our various lunar orbital missions, however
China is not exactly sitting on their extremely wise old butts, are
they.

Here's the latest HDTV images, except for having those moon surface
saturations of somewhat badly skewed color fully removed. In other
words, our moon is getting HDTV depicted as entirely color blind, as
limited to gray-sacle, and only Earth is getting artificially
accommodated in full living color.
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/11/20071113_kaguya_e.html
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/11/img...kaguya_01l.jpg
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/11/img...kaguya_02l.jpg

Here's those previously unfiltered original images of the off-color
saturation imposed tint, via all of that pesky secondary or recoil
worth of such a bluish/violet hue look-see at our naked and thus
unavoidably reactive moon (images 01 ~ 13):
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/10/20071021_kaguya_e.pdf
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/10/img..._kaguya_01.jpg
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/10/img..._kaguya_03.jpg
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/10/img..._kaguya_05.jpg
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/10/img..._kaguya_10.jpg
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/10/img..._kaguya_11.jpg

Besides the matter of JAXA/NHK having only turned on their HDTV color
pixels as for accommodating those selected pixels of Earth (adjusting
gamma to 4x alone gives us that sort of proof, or otherwise by simply
replacing their image black with most any other color), though it's
still every bit worth an as-is look-see for taking notice as to how
extremely dark and otherwise somewhat of an average coal like 0.11
albedo or actually of a slightly sooty darker kind of dusty deep soft
lunar terrain of such minimal albedo, meaning that it's very poorly
reflective of the visible spectrum, as otherwise correctly
representing that which our extremely cosmic dusty and electrostatic
charged moon really is, as well as for having been so clearly HVTV
imaged w/o those pesky color saturations except for their
accommodating within the very same HDTV FOV as hosting a very colorful
Earth, as having been illuminated by the very same raw solar spectrum
that has unavoidably skewed the moon itself by the unfiltered and
subsequent excess amounts of those violet and UV photons, of which
CCDs are by rights extremely sensitive to.

Now then, and I'm quite honestly serious about this next part; do we
see anything of that naked lunar terrain that's looking as though
being the least bit NASA/Apollo (65%~75% reflective) 0.65~0.075 albedo
worthy, as though looking much like a certain guano island as having
been xenon arc lamp spectrum illuminated and otherwise physically
modified in order to suit their supposed moon look, on behalf of those
hocus-pocus Apollo landings? (silly question, as I didn't think so)

Now try to further imagine how much brighter than Earth those little
violet color skewed pixels worth of Venus are going to look.
Actually, with the HDTV's far better than Kodak film DR(dynamic range)
is why the likes of Mars, Jupiter and Saturn should also become part
of those future JAXA/KAGUYA(SELENE) obtained images, along with a few
of those most bright of background stars unless having been
intentionally spectrum filtered out or subsequently PhotoShop
removed. With a proper optical spectrum filter (of which KAGUYA may
not have to work with) is where we'll get to see the true deep golden
brownish color of our moon, along with certain other raw secondary/
recoil photons of those cosmic and local deposited mineral elements
which should become downright interesting, even though color skewed
unless via earthshine because, there's such a great deal of secondary/
recoil UV that'll always tend to saturate most everything into giving
us that somewhat purple/bluish or violet hue or weird tint.

And to think that there's going to be so much more of the truth to
come via JAXA/KAGUYA(SELENE), such as once those full color spectrum
images of the moon are properly adjusted for their more natural to the
human eye's limited hue detection worth of color saturations, plus
those other nifty instruments start reporting their science data, as
well as from whatever China can uncover and share is just around the
very next corner.
--
Brad Guth

On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 08:34:54 -0600, kT wrote:

http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/11/20071113_kaguya_e.html

Heh heh heh ... Go JAXA! Go Japan!

That looks so eerily like the background from the SPACE 1999 Premiere,
"Breakaway," it wasn't funny.



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

On Nov 16, 9:49 am, Michael Gallagher wrote:

That looks so eerily like the background from the SPACE 1999 Premiere,
"Breakaway," it wasn't funny.

That's true, however China and Japan are clearly not taking another
NASA no for an answer, and that's why this kind of fresh and honestly
revealing look-see with further science and planetology measurements
other than pictures are being accomplished by other than our crack
NASA wizards that have to concentrate upon their keeping those semitic
butt-cracks as tight and straight as possible.

Quite oddly there's hardly an honest Usenet word on behalf of the
Chinese moon exploration mission that's closing in on what Japan has
as an ongoing 3-satellite observation and science gathering process,
that'll each pick up the slack where the previous US and Russian
missions of mostly hocus pocus disinformation and/or evidence
exclusion left off.

However, once again and again, it's perfectly clear that our NASA/
Apollo brown-nosed clowns are running their very own Usenet of damage-
control infomercials fully amock, all because of those original NASA/
Apollo lies and subsequent denials of their being in denial, is simply
all too Hitler and/or GW Bush like.

And only because I'm still such a nice guy is why we even have this
following insignificant contribution by our very own "kT". But we
should take a little further notice as to how all the usenet lights
tend to go out whenever there's another not so insignificant speck of
truth about our moon to behold, especially when such doesn't in any
way support as to what those as "having the right stuff" were tilling
us to believe.

"Japan First Back To The Moon!" / kT
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.s...8a85929879b6a0
"Heh heh heh ... Go JAXA! Go Japan!"

I believe that basic though unusually simple topic entro by kT is
absolutely right on the money, at least Japan being of the first other
than Russian or those of our various lunar orbital missions, however
China is not exactly sitting on their extremely wise old butts, are
they.

Here's the latest HDTV images, except for having those moon surface
saturations of somewhat badly skewed color fully removed. In other
words, our moon is getting HDTV depicted as entirely color blind, as
limited to gray-sacle, and only Earth is getting artificially
accommodated in full living color.
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/11/20071113_kaguya_e.html
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/11/img...kaguya_01l.jpg
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/11/img...kaguya_02l.jpg

Here's those previously unfiltered original images of the off-color
saturation imposed tint, via all of that pesky secondary or recoil
worth of such a bluish/violet hue look-see at our naked and thus
unavoidably reactive moon (images 01 ~ 13):
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/10/20071021_kaguya_e.pdf
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/10/img..._kaguya_01.jpg
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/10/img..._kaguya_03.jpg
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/10/img..._kaguya_05.jpg
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/10/img..._kaguya_10.jpg
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/10/img..._kaguya_11.jpg

Besides the matter of JAXA/NHK having only turned on their HDTV color
pixels as for accommodating those selected pixels of Earth (adjusting
gamma to 4x alone gives us that sort of proof, or otherwise by simply
replacing their image black with most any other color), though it's
still every bit worth an as-is look-see for taking notice as to how
extremely dark and otherwise somewhat of an average coal like 0.11
albedo or actually of a slightly sooty darker kind of dusty deep soft
lunar terrain of such minimal albedo, meaning that it's very poorly
reflective of the visible spectrum, as otherwise correctly
representing that which our extremely cosmic dusty and electrostatic
charged moon really is, as well as for having been so clearly HVTV
imaged w/o those pesky color saturations except for their
accommodating within the very same HDTV FOV as hosting a very colorful
Earth, as having been illuminated by the very same raw solar spectrum
that has unavoidably skewed the moon itself by the unfiltered and
subsequent excess amounts of those violet and UV photons, of which
CCDs are by rights extremely sensitive to.

Now then, and I'm being quite honestly serious about this next part;
do we see anything of that naked lunar terrain that's looking as
though being the least bit NASA/Apollo (65%~75% reflective) 0.65~0.075
albedo worthy, as though looking much like a certain guano island as
having been xenon arc lamp spectrum illuminated and otherwise
physically modified in order to suit their supposed moon look, on
behalf of those hocus-pocus Apollo landings? (silly question, as I
didn't think so)

Now try to further imagine how much brighter than Earth those little
violet color skewed pixels worth of Venus are going to look.
Actually, with the HDTV's far better than Kodak film DR(dynamic range)
is why the likes of Mars, Jupiter and Saturn should also become part
of those future JAXA/KAGUYA(SELENE) obtained images, along with a few
of those most bright of background stars unless having been
intentionally spectrum filtered out or subsequently PhotoShop
removed. With a proper optical spectrum filter (of which KAGUYA may
not have to work with) is where we'll get to see the true deep golden
brownish color of our moon, along with certain other raw secondary/
recoil photons of those cosmic and local deposited mineral elements
which should become downright interesting, even though color skewed
unless via earthshine because, there's such a great deal of secondary/
recoil UV that'll always tend to saturate most everything into giving
us that somewhat purple/bluish or violet hue or weird tint.

And to think that there's going to be so much more of the truth to
come via JAXA/KAGUYA(SELENE), such as once those full color spectrum
images of the moon are properly adjusted for their more natural to the
human eye's limited hue detection worth of color saturations, plus
those other nifty instruments start reporting their science data, as
well as from whatever China can uncover and share is just around the
very next corner.
--
Brad Guth

André wrote:
MichaelJP plaatste dit op zijn scherm :
"MetroHenrik" wrote in message
. dk...

"kT" skrev i en meddelelse
...
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/11/20071113_kaguya_e.html

Heh heh heh ... Go JAXA! Go Japan!

To kill all conspiracy, it would be fun to se a picture of all the
leftovers
from Apollo.

Henrik

You really think so? To a conspiracy nut the Kaguya pictures are also
clearly fakes, note the complete absence of stars from the released
shots!

That is a normal thing. When a picture is taken from a planet (does not
matter if it is Jupiter, Saturn or Venus for example) the light
reflected by that planet is very bright compared to the light from the
stars.

Try to take a picture from an object with the sun behind or next to it;
the sun overexposes the picture.

Duh. MichaelJP was being ironic. Conspiracy nuts don't understand that
fact when applied to Apollo photography; why would they suddenly see the
light (so to speak) when it comes to Kaguya photography?

That's odd, in that we have none of the usual NASA/Apollo damage-
control rusemasters doing their warm and fuzzy thing of covering their
butts. Perhaps Japan and China are not going to play by those same
pagan and/or pretend atheist rules of hocus-pocus and cover thy own
infomercial spewing butts until Hell freezes over and them pigs fly.
--
Brad Guth

On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 11:13:47 -0800 (PST), BradGuth
wrote:

.... do we see anything of that naked lunar terrain that's looking as
though being the least bit NASA/Apollo (65%~75% reflective) 0.65~0.075
albedo worthy ....

Yes. Apart from the color -- which could be an artifiact of the
camera --- it doesn't look too different from the images returned from
the Moon by Apollo. I just looked in one of the books I have.

As to how bright the Moon is or isnt, go outside on a full Moon. It
looks pretty bright to me.

Now please go and take your meds.



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

"kT" wrote in message
...
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/11/20071113_kaguya_e.html

Heh heh heh ... Go JAXA! Go Japan!

Actually, that would be *Lunar Prospector*, which had a strong impact on
lunar science.

On Nov 18, 10:30 am, Michael Gallagher wrote:
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 11:13:47 -0800 (PST), BradGuth

wrote:
.... do we see anything of that naked lunar terrain that's looking as
though being the least bit NASA/Apollo (65%~75% reflective) 0.65~0.075
albedo worthy ....

Yes. Apart from the color -- which could be an artifiact of the
camera --- it doesn't look too different from the images returned from
the Moon by Apollo. I just looked in one of the books I have.

As to how bright the Moon is or isnt, go outside on a full Moon. It
looks pretty bright to me.

Now please go and take your meds.

Coal offers an albedo of 0.1, as 10% reflective of the visual
spectrum. and that's pretty darn close to what the average reflective
surface of our moon really is, although actually having a somewhat
deep golden brownish hue or tint that only gets terribly color skewed
to the unfiltered Kodak eye, or especially to the wider spectrum
sensitive CCD eye by all of that raw photon saturation and secondary/
recoil worth of UV, near UV plus those of a violet worth of solar
photons.

BTW, there's actual NASA obtained images of our moon and Earth within
the exact same frame that proves I'm 100% correct. Those images have
been posted for more than a decade.

Sorry to hear that you're such an obvious bigot, and a liar to boot.
--
Brad Guth