THE PHOTON AND GRAVITATION

EQUILIBRIUM AND PHOTON IN THE EXPANDING UNIVERSE

Copyright 1984-2003 Allen C. Goodrich

As the universe expands the sum of kinetic and
potential energies remains a constant. The expansion
of the universe results in a decrease of potential
energy and an equal increase of kinetic energy.
A mass (m) or charge (e) in an equilibrium orbit ,
increases in kinetic energy at the same rate that
it decreases in potential energy relative to the
rest of the universe. This is not apparent relative
to other masses that are in the same time frame
(such as the sun or other planets).It is only
apparent relative to distant galaxies in the form
of a red shift. The equilibrium orbial radius is the
only orbit where the total energy remains constant
as the universe expands. Any change of orbit requires
the addition or removal of energy,and the formation
of a photon. The planetary and moon orbits are
fixed by the fact that it is very difficult to provide
enough energy to cause a change of orbit.
The atomic electron orbit can be more easily
changed by the formation of a photon ( a change of
potential energy of the electron relative to the rest
of the universe and a change of the potential energy
of the rest of the universe relative to the electron ).

Planets , moons and electrons are normally in equilibriium
orbits where the total energy is constant.
m(2 pi L)^2/t^2 + G(M-m)m/L + e^2/4 pi E_o L = a constant.
kinetic plus potential energy equals a constant.
L is orbital distance; m is mass in question; M is total
energy of the effective universe ;t is time ;G is
gravitational constant; E_o is permitivity or equilibrium
constant ;e is the charge of the electron and proton.
In an equilibrium orbit any change of kinetic energy equal
a negative change of potential energy.
Delta (a change of ) m(2 pi L)^2/t^2 = Delta G(M-m)m/L +
Delta e^2/4 pi E_o L. The change of potential energy of the
charge is usually so much larger then the change of the
potential energy of neutral mass that the latter can be
neglected.

For the non equilibrium orbital motion ( when a photon is
formed ),the change of kinetic energy does not equal the
change of potential energy. and a non stable motion results,
It tries to return to equilibrium orbital motion by the
gain or loss of a photon h/t.

SEE:
THE UNIVERSE- A GRAND UNIFIED THEORY OF MASS ENERGY
SPACE TIME FRAME MECHANICS-APPEARING IN NEWSLETTER
"SPECTRUM" OF THE BUFFALO ASTRONOMICAL ASSOCIATION
INC. NOV.1996 TO FEB.1997
See http://ourworld.cs.com/gravitymechan.../business.html
FUNDAMENTAL EQUATION OF THE UNIVERSE
http://ourworld.cs.com/gravitymechan...e/profile.html
TIDES AND GRAVITY MECHANICS
http://ourworld.cs.com/gravitymechan...ge/resume.html

A new Grand Unified Theory of the photon and gravitation
is given, which predicted, stimulated the above research,
and is consistent with the new findings.

GRAVITYMECHANIC2 wrote:

EQUILIBRIUM AND PHOTON IN THE EXPANDING UNIVERSE

Copyright 1984-2003 Allen C. Goodrich

As the universe expands the sum of kinetic and
potential energies remains a constant. The expansion
of the universe results in a decrease of potential
energy and an equal increase of kinetic energy.

How do you get that? As the universe expands, everything gets further
apart, which would constitute an increase in potential energy. Plus the
rate of expansion will be slowing, which would constitute a decrease in
kinetic energy.

If you shoot a bullet in the air, it starts with 0 potential energy
(referenced to the surface of the earth), and a large amount of kinetic
energy. When it reachs it's maximum height, it will have a maximum of
potential energy, and the kinetic energy will be 0 since it will stop
momentarily at that point.

Why would the universe be different?

Marshall

Have you noticed that instead of going to, say, sci.physics with this
crap, the kooks all come here. Sci.astro - one stop kook shop?

"N'vok" wrote in message
om...
Have you noticed that instead of going to, say, sci.physics with this
crap, the kooks all come here. Sci.astro - one stop kook shop?

Well, I suppose X marks the spot.

Anyone remember Nancy's "sci.astro debates?" She changed them to look
like she'd won and but them on Zetatalk. That site's actually still
going!
Memories...

"Greg Neill" wrote in message m...
"N'vok" wrote in message
om...
Have you noticed that instead of going to, say, sci.physics with this
crap, the kooks all come here. Sci.astro - one stop kook shop?

Well, I suppose X marks the spot.