![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 26, 12:06 am, Iordani wrote:
Iordani wrote: home@away wrote: I often do solar observing, looking and videoing Venus, Saturn is visible, as is Mars, and the brighter stars are easily seen. Can you actually see some stars during daytime? And Saturn? Well, seems you can. Just found some good sites about this. Must say I'm quite surprised and will try it out. 'To reduce Watches to the right measure of dayes, or to know how much they goe too fast or too slow in 24. hours.' " Here take notice, that the Sun or the Earth passeth the 12. Signes, or makes an entire revolution in the Ecliptick in 365 days, 5 hours 49 min. or there about, and that those days, reckon'd from noon to noon, are of different lenghts; AS IS KNOWN TO ALL THAT IS VERS'D IN ASTRONOMY. Now between the longest and the shortest of those days, a day may be taken of such a length, as 365 such days, 5. hours &c. (the same numbers as before) make up, or are equall to that revolution: And this is call'd the Equal or Mean day, according to which the Watches are to be set; and therefore the Hour or Minute shew'd by the Watches, though they be perfectly Iust and equal, must needs differ almost continually from those that are shew'd by the Sun, or are reckon'd according to its Motion." http://www.xs4all.nl/~adcs/Huygens/06/kort-E.html The pre-Copernican astronomers referenced planetary motion from th point of view of a stationary Earth,the heliocentric astronomers referenced planetary motion from and orbitall moving and axial rotating Earth,the 17th century empiricists referenced axial and orbital motion of the zodiacal framework hence we now have numbskulls who think astronomy is a magnification hobby that occurs at night. The freakish situation where axial and orbital motion is referenced off a celestial sphere leads to the catastrophic view of axial and orbital motion as a mixture of astrology and creationism - http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...3%A9reo.en.png In the noble history of human reasoning and discovery,there is nothing worse than the fictional forcing of tying axial rotation to the return of a star to a meridian,it is beyond insanity but unfortunately it is now the dominant view. I do not mind what you have done to yourselves,it is the rest of humanity who really needs an authority to handle the destruction of astronomy,its methods and its insights by people who now wonder if there is such a thing as 'daytime observing'. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Observing planets in the daytime | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 2 | May 31st 07 10:28 PM |
Daytime McNaught from 42N | Stephen Paul | Amateur Astronomy | 7 | January 13th 07 04:57 AM |
Daytime Venus? | [email protected] | UK Astronomy | 4 | December 20th 05 01:36 PM |
Daytime collimation | Tim Auton | UK Astronomy | 3 | June 6th 04 12:14 PM |
Daytime Collimation? | Dan Wenz | Amateur Astronomy | 15 | October 15th 03 01:38 AM |