Less Apollo 11, more Thunderbird 11. Wires prove the Apollo moon landings were filmed on a set.

On Oct 8, 2:14 pm, wrote:
See the effect of wires simulating 1/6th gravity.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wdMvQTNLaUE

OK, Let's see.....I'm from the Government....I want to perpetraie a
hoax on the American people...aw, what the hell, let's b.s. the
WORLD....sooooo....I'm gonna spend millions on a set, bribing people
to keep silent....gee, guess I'm gonna hafta develop a giant rocket to
launch, just to pad the bill a little,......but you know what? I'm not
even gonna worry about editing our film, just a waste of time....
PULL yer HEAD OUTTA yer A$$ !!!!!!!!

On Oct 9, 6:22 am, bob352 wrote:
On Oct 8, 2:14 pm, wrote:

See the effect of wires simulating 1/6th gravity.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wdMvQTNLaUE

OK, Let's see.....I'm from the Government....I want to perpetraie a
hoax on the American people...aw, what the hell, let's b.s. the
WORLD....sooooo....I'm gonna spend millions on a set, bribing people
to keep silent....gee, guess I'm gonna hafta develop a giant rocket to
launch, just to pad the bill a little,......but you know what? I'm not
even gonna worry about editing our film, just a waste of time....
PULL yer HEAD OUTTA yer A$$ !!!!!!!!

Got rad-hard DNA?

Got any unfiltered Kodak FOV look-see of Venus?

Got that R&D prototype fly-by-rocket lander?

In addition to those various links of our Apollo moon landing hoax or
ruse/sting of the century, once again here's something new that's as
equally extra weird, as to our pondering why all the unusual lack of
topic interest, or rather perhaps why the ongoing official usenet
banishment of anything JAXA SELENE/KAGUYA?

Perhaps JAXA's SELENE/KAGUYA via H-2A/H-IIA is also having to become
yet another hoax, especially since it's getting so much harder to hide
the truths about our moon.

Japan lunar probe reaches orbit
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.s...3f35e7781e5cdb
JAXA SELENE/KAGUYA via H-2A/H-IIA
http://www.jaxa.jp/countdown/f13/index_e.html
http://www.selene.jaxa.jp/index_e.htm
For some silly odd reason there's been nothing of any good (meaning
informative or otherwise deductive) usenet chat about this nifty JAXA
moon mission. It's as though being all super hush-hush or taboo/
nondisclosure rated. Wonder why?

"The KAGUYA mission targets are the global characterization of lunar
surface and detailed gravimetry."
Sounds perfectly nifty and worth every bit of whatever that mission of
remote obtained science can contribute about our physically dark,
somewhat salty and otherwise unavoidably naked/anticathode worthy
mascon of gamma and X-ray saturated environment, especially as for
eventually offering those detailed reviews per each of our NASA/Apollo
hard landings or impact sites.

Perhaps this time around those new and greatly improved CCD obtained
images will honestly utilize their full dynamic range, and thus
unavoidably provide a few good FOVs that'll have to include the rather
nifty vibrance and unusual natural raw colour spectrum of Venus above
the moon's physically dark horizon, possibly even eventually sharing a
few shots that'll include Earth and Venus within the very same Field
Of View that'll still include something of the moon's natural deep
colours and contrast of those rather unusual mineral deposits.

BTW, only taking 3 weeks instead of 3 days to get JAXA's SELENE into
its outer-most lunar orbit. (go figure)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H-IIA
H2A2022 / 285,000 kg (2 stage + SRBs) / total payload mass was 3020 kg
http://www.jaxa.jp/pr/brochure/pdf/01/rocket01.pdf
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SELENE
-
Main Orbiter
Mass: 2914 kg
Size: 2.1 x 2.1 x 4.8 m
Attitude control: Three-axis stabilized
Power: 3.5 kW (Max.)
Mission period: 1 year
Mission Orbit: Circular orbit,
Altitude 100 km
Inclination 90 degree

Their total payload mass was later reported as 3020 kg + 1400 kg
faring

107:1 ratio of rocket/payload (323.42/3.02 tonnes)
H2A2022 323.42 tonnes w/fairing and payload, requires those extra 2
SRBs + 2 Solid strap-on Boosters (SSBs)

With an inert mass of merely 42.62 tonnes, or 13.18% (as opposed to
our NASA/Apollo fiasco of having to start off hauling nearly a 30%
worth of inert mass, with merely a 60:1 rocket/payload ratio) is what
seems more than a tad bit odd, if not entirely hocus-pocus worthy.

As for the SELENE mission's orbital delivery process only taking an
energy efficient 3 weeks (instead of NASA/Apollo's swift 3 days with
fuel and payload to spare) in order to get JAXA's 3 tonne mission into
lunar orbit (actually it's taking yet another two weeks for getting
into the desired 100 km polar orbit), as such seems to be entirely
believable as based upon those regular laws of fly-by-rocket physics
that our NASA/Apollo wizards apparently never have to worry about,
just like their not haviong to worry about the gamma and X-ray
saturated surface environment that was also highly electrostatic and
salty.
http://www.jaxa.jp/countdown/f13/top...330_loi3_e.pdf

Shouldn't we bother to ask if there's a little something about our
Third Reich semitic fortified NASA/Apollo hocus-pocus worth of
conditional fly-by-rocket physics, that which we do not yet honestly
know about? (apparently so)
- Brad Guth -

"BradGuth" wrote in message
ups.com...

Got rad-hard DNA?

Got any unfiltered Kodak FOV look-see of Venus?

Got that R&D prototype fly-by-rocket lander?

Got mental illness?

"Eekamouse" wrote in message
...
"BradGuth" wrote in message
ups.com...

Got rad-hard DNA?

Got any unfiltered Kodak FOV look-see of Venus?

Got that R&D prototype fly-by-rocket lander?

Got mental illness?

He's definitely a net kook. Whether or not he's got an actual mental
illness is up to the medical profession to decide.

I'd killfile him and put him out of your misery. ;-)

Jeff
--
"When transportation is cheap, frequent, reliable, and flexible,
everything else becomes easier."
- Jon Goff

On Oct 9, 11:18 am, "Jeff Findley"
wrote:
"Eekamouse" wrote in message

...

"BradGuth" wrote in message
oups.com...

Got rad-hard DNA?

Got any unfiltered Kodak FOV look-see of Venus?

Got that R&D prototype fly-by-rocket lander?

Got mental illness?

He's definitely a net kook. Whether or not he's got an actual mental
illness is up to the medical profession to decide.

I'd killfile him and put him out of your misery. ;-)

Jeff
--
"When transportation is cheap, frequent, reliable, and flexible,
everything else becomes easier."
- Jon Goff

More of the same old evidence exclusion and/or topic/author banishment
via killfile, works almost as good as when you folks were burning
books and witches at the stake, or having that holy grail moment of
putting the likes of Jesus Christ on a stick for another one of your
faith-based PR stunts.
- Brad Guth -

On Oct 11, 7:32 am, BradGuth wrote:
On Oct 9, 11:18 am, "Jeff Findley"
wrote:



"Eekamouse" wrote in message

...

"BradGuth" wrote in message
oups.com...

Got rad-hard DNA?

Got any unfiltered Kodak FOV look-see of Venus?

Got that R&D prototype fly-by-rocket lander?

Got mental illness?

He's definitely a net kook. Whether or not he's got an actual mental
illness is up to the medical profession to decide.

I'd killfile him and put him out of your misery. ;-)

Jeff
--
"When transportation is cheap, frequent, reliable, and flexible,
everything else becomes easier."
- Jon Goff

More of the same old evidence exclusion and/or topic/author banishment
via killfile, works almost as good as when you folks were burning
books and witches at the stake, or having that holy grail moment of
putting the likes of Jesus Christ on a stick for another one of your
faith-based PR stunts.
- Brad Guth -

rofl. You sure have some delusions of granduer, fruit-loop.

Tell me kook-boy: exactly what interest do "the Jews" have in covering
up your "evidence" of life on Venus and faking a moon landing? Do tell

On Oct 10, 8:47 pm, wrote:
On Oct 11, 7:32 am, BradGuth wrote:





On Oct 9, 11:18 am, "Jeff Findley"
wrote:

"Eekamouse" wrote in message

...

"BradGuth" wrote in message
oups.com...

Got rad-hard DNA?

Got any unfiltered Kodak FOV look-see of Venus?

Got that R&D prototype fly-by-rocket lander?

Got mental illness?

He's definitely a net kook. Whether or not he's got an actual mental
illness is up to the medical profession to decide.

I'd killfile him and put him out of your misery. ;-)

Jeff
--
"When transportation is cheap, frequent, reliable, and flexible,
everything else becomes easier."
- Jon Goff

More of the same old evidence exclusion and/or topic/author banishment
via killfile, works almost as good as when you folks were burning
books and witches at the stake, or having that holy grail moment of
putting the likes of Jesus Christ on a stick for another one of your
faith-based PR stunts.
- Brad Guth -

rofl. You sure have some delusions of granduer, fruit-loop.

Tell me kook-boy: exactly what interest do "the Jews" have in covering
up your "evidence" of life on Venus and faking a moon landing? Do tell

Been there, done that. Where on Earth have you been?

Do you have some truth about where and/or as to how the planet Venus
was being continually hidden from view?

Do you hace some NASA/Apollo fly-by-rocket expertise or plain old laws
of physics you'd like to share?
- Brad Guth -

On Tue, 9 Oct 2007 13:46:06 -0400, in a place far, far away,
"Eekamouse" made the phosphor on my monitor glow in
such a way as to indicate that:

"BradGuth" wrote in message
oups.com...

Got rad-hard DNA?

Got any unfiltered Kodak FOV look-see of Venus?

Got that R&D prototype fly-by-rocket lander?

Got mental illness?

In spades. Killfile him, as most sane people have.

"Rand Simberg" wrote in message In spades.
Killfile him, as most sane people have.

How would YOU know what sane people do? :-))

On Oct 9, 11:58 am, "jb" wrote:
"Rand Simberg" wrote in message In spades.

Killfile him, as most sane people have.

How would YOU know what sane people do? :-))

Interesting how terribly upset the mainstream status quo tends to get,
especially whenever we're asking about any of those unfiltered Kodak
FOVs as easily having included Venus, or much less of anything
pertaining to this JAXA Selene mission that even though less than half
the inert mass still took so much extra applied physics of rocket
energy, and for such taking better than 11 fold the amount of travel
time for getting their equipment into final orbit.

Is JAXA's rocket physics actually that primitive and/or outdated, in
that they simply couldn't have matched or much less improved upon
those methods utilized by our Third Reich Yids responsible for
accomplishing most of our NASA/Apollo missions?
- Brad Guth -