![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Reports coming in saying it's not responding, that NASA craft are
hearing nothing. The party's not over yet - there's another window of opportunity coming up in a few hours, but the fact it's not responding when expected doesn't bode well. *sigh* David -- per aspera ad astra |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
David Sander wrote:
Reports coming in saying it's not responding, that NASA craft are hearing nothing. The party's not over yet - there's another window of opportunity coming up in a few hours, but the fact it's not responding when expected doesn't bode well. *sigh* Jeez. Just a few hours, and the probe has already surrendered. How much of it was made in France? And how long before its loss is blamed on George Bush? -- Scott Lowther, Engineer Remove the obvious (capitalized) anti-spam gibberish from the reply-to e-mail address |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 25 Dec 2003 08:31:25 GMT, Scott Lowther
wrote: Jeez. Just a few hours, and the probe has already surrendered. How much of it was made in France? ....The only thing I can say about this apparent failure is that I honestly hope this is a hard slap in the face to Europe as a whole to wake them up to the fact that "Faster/Better/Cheaper" does not work, and they need to quit being ****ing cheap and SPEND WHAT'S REQUIRED! I was *really* hoping Beagle 2 would make it. I really, really was. OM -- "No ******* ever won a war by dying for | http://www.io.com/~o_m his country. He won it by making the other | Sergeant-At-Arms poor dumb ******* die for his country." | Human O-Ring Society - General George S. Patton, Jr |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "David Sander" wrote in message ... Reports coming in saying it's not responding, that NASA craft are hearing nothing. The party's not over yet - there's another window of opportunity coming up in a few hours, but the fact it's not responding when expected doesn't bode well. *sigh* ... read somewhere that Martian sandstorms could be dense enough to block the solar panel arrays. So Beagle could be off to a slow start. *fingers-crossed!!* |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"David Sander" wrote in message
... Reports coming in saying it's not responding, that NASA craft are hearing nothing. The party's not over yet - there's another window of opportunity coming up in a few hours, but the fact it's not responding when expected doesn't bode well. THe first words will be: "I'm not dead yet! I'm feeling much better." -- If you have had problems with Illinois Student Assistance Commission (ISAC), please contact shredder at bellsouth dot net. There may be a class-action lawsuit in the works. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"OM" om@our_blessed_lady_mary_of_the_holy_NASA_researc h_facility.org wrote
in message news ![]() On Thu, 25 Dec 2003 08:31:25 GMT, Scott Lowther wrote: Jeez. Just a few hours, and the probe has already surrendered. How much of it was made in France? ...The only thing I can say about this apparent failure is that I honestly hope this is a hard slap in the face to Europe as a whole to wake them up to the fact that "Faster/Better/Cheaper" does not work, and they need to quit being ****ing cheap and SPEND WHAT'S REQUIRED! More likely the lesson learned will be: "Well, that just goes to show that it's too expensive to do now. We'll try again much later, when we're not in office and can't be blamed." -- If you have had problems with Illinois Student Assistance Commission (ISAC), please contact shredder at bellsouth dot net. There may be a class-action lawsuit in the works. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
correct me if i am wrong (i am using only memory here) but every lander that
has made it made first contact exactly on time, correct? so if this oversized pocket watch (how quaintly british!) makes contact later, would it not be the first time a lander that went missing for any period of time turned out to be OK ESA should get kudo's for its orbiter at any rate |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Scott Lowther :
Jeez. Just a few hours, and the probe has already surrendered. How much of it was made in France? This is a London Open University project. France don't invest in sciences, only in cheese making. Yvan Bozzonetti. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , bob wrote:
correct me if i am wrong (i am using only memory here) but every lander that has made it made first contact exactly on time, correct? so if this oversized pocket watch (how quaintly british!) makes contact later, would it not be the first time a lander that went missing for any period of time turned out to be OK Every prior lander was capable of contacting home itself; Beagle pretty much has to wait until a relay sat can see it. If the landing site is off from the predicted ellipse, which is quite possible, Odyssey may simply not have found it. (Alternately, it's apparently possible for the lander to take too long to open, and not be ready for transmission in the first few hours) We'll see if Jodrell can find a carrier signal tonight. -- -Andrew Gray |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Colin Pilinger to head inquiry into what went wrong with Beagle... | Tom Merkle | Policy | 4 | February 1st 04 12:58 AM |
hope for Beagle 2 ? | Simon Laub | Science | 7 | January 18th 04 11:24 PM |
Beagle 2 assistance | Martin Milan | Science | 6 | December 30th 03 03:50 PM |
Beagle 2 landing sequence - how? | Abdul Ahad | Technology | 2 | December 10th 03 11:55 AM |