..From the crew of Apollo 8..

"Bruce Palmer" wrote in message
.net...
Anonymous via the Cypherpunks Tonga Remailer wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003 15:37:03 GMT, "G.Beat"
wrote:


Jim Lovell appeared at the Chicago Museum of Science and Industry
(location
of the Apollo 8 capsule) yesterday ...
and recited the words from Genesis with 2 students -- as part of a
charity
event.



Did NASA designe a specal Bible that works in weightlessness just for
the misson?

Hallerb


Experimenting with anon remailers there, Bob? Hint: When you combine a
lack of spelling skill with anon remailers, the use of a spell checker
is _mandatory_.


I highly doubt it's Bob. He may be a lot of things, but I truly don't think
he's

a) stupid enough to sign his own name to an anonymous remailer
b) stupid enough to post the same post multiple times.


--
bp
Proud Member of the Human O-Ring Society Since 2003

"Greg D. Moore (Strider)" wrote in message
...

"Bruce Palmer" wrote in message
.net...
Anonymous via the Cypherpunks Tonga Remailer wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003 15:37:03 GMT, "G.Beat"

wrote:


Jim Lovell appeared at the Chicago Museum of Science and Industry
(location
of the Apollo 8 capsule) yesterday ...
and recited the words from Genesis with 2 students -- as part of a
charity
event.



Did NASA designe a specal Bible that works in weightlessness just for
the misson?

Hallerb


Experimenting with anon remailers there, Bob? Hint: When you combine a
lack of spelling skill with anon remailers, the use of a spell checker
is _mandatory_.


I highly doubt it's Bob. He may be a lot of things, but I truly don't
think
he's

a) stupid enough to sign his own name to an anonymous remailer
b) stupid enough to post the same post multiple times.

Maybe, maybe not, but I'll bet if we check the archives he blamed NASA
management's choice of Bible on that mission for the loss of Columbia.
--
If you have had problems with Illinois Student Assistance Commission (ISAC),
please contact shredder at bellsouth dot net. There may be a class-action
lawsuit
in the works.

Scott Hedrick wrote:

Experimenting with anon remailers there, Bob? Hint: When you combine a
lack of spelling skill with anon remailers, the use of a spell checker
is _mandatory_.


I highly doubt it's Bob. He may be a lot of things, but I truly don't

think

he's

a) stupid enough to sign his own name to an anonymous remailer
b) stupid enough to post the same post multiple times.


Maybe, maybe not,

A poorly done forgery, but evidently done well enough to leave gullible
folk undecided.

--
Hop David
http://clowder.net/hop/index.html

Hop David wrote:


A poorly done forgery, but evidently done well enough to leave
gullible folk undecided.


The question it leaves is (if I may paraphrase from the movie "The
Untouchables"): "Who would claim to have written that...that didn't?"

Pat

Greg D. Moore (Strider) wrote:

"Bruce Palmer" wrote in message
.net...

Anonymous via the Cypherpunks Tonga Remailer wrote:

On Tue, 23 Dec 2003 15:37:03 GMT, "G.Beat"

wrote:


Jim Lovell appeared at the Chicago Museum of Science and Industry

(location

of the Apollo 8 capsule) yesterday ...
and recited the words from Genesis with 2 students -- as part of a

charity

event.



Did NASA designe a specal Bible that works in weightlessness just for

the misson?

Hallerb


Experimenting with anon remailers there, Bob? Hint: When you combine a
lack of spelling skill with anon remailers, the use of a spell checker
is _mandatory_.



I highly doubt it's Bob. He may be a lot of things, but I truly don't think
he's

a) stupid enough to sign his own name to an anonymous remailer
b) stupid enough to post the same post multiple times.

You're probably right. As far as point (b) goes, often anon remailers
are set up in "chains", i.e. the post travels through more than one
remailer. Since remailers are not all that reliable - they tend to come
and go - very often a message will be sent through more than one chain
to increase the odds that it will make it to its ultimate destination.
If that's the case here then it's possible that the message was only
sent once. It appeared twice because both chains successfully made the
delivery.

--
bp
Proud Member of the Human O-Ring Society Since 2003

Greg D. Moore (Strider) wrote:

I highly doubt it's Bob. He may be a lot of things, but I truly don't think
he's

a) stupid enough to sign his own name to an anonymous remailer
b) stupid enough to post the same post multiple times.


Oh, ye of little faith....

Pat

On Wed, 24 Dec 2003 04:00:59 -0600, Pat Flannery
wrote:

Greg D. Moore (Utter Idiot) babbled:

I highly doubt it's Bob. He may be a lot of things, but I truly don't think
he's

a) stupid enough to sign his own name to an anonymous remailer
b) stupid enough to post the same post multiple times.


Oh, ye of little faith....

....Faith doesn't enter into it. Greg just proved once and for all that
my claims of his being an idiot are correct. If I can't have the
entire Maxson Family cast into the pits of the Real Hell for
Chrisnukkah, this is a good substitute present in my book!

OM

--

"No ******* ever won a war by dying for | http://www.io.com/~o_m
his country. He won it by making the other | Sergeant-At-Arms
poor dumb ******* die for his country." | Human O-Ring Society

- General George S. Patton, Jr

"OM" om@our_blessed_lady_mary_of_the_holy_NASA_researc h_facility.org wrote
in message ...
On Wed, 24 Dec 2003 04:00:59 -0600, Pat Flannery
wrote:

Greg D. Moore (Utter Idiot) babbled:

I highly doubt it's Bob. He may be a lot of things, but I truly don't
think
he's

a) stupid enough to sign his own name to an anonymous remailer
b) stupid enough to post the same post multiple times.


Oh, ye of little faith....

...Faith doesn't enter into it. Greg just proved once and for all that
my claims of his being an idiot are correct. If I can't have the
entire Maxson Family cast into the pits of the Real Hell for
Chrisnukkah, this is a good substitute present in my book!


And a Happy Holiday to you to OM.


OM

Greg D. Moore (Strider) wrote:

And a Happy Holiday to you to OM.



The real trick would be trying to separate a real Hallerb posting from a
fake one, based on internal content. This would be like trying to tell a
real Jackson Pollock painting from a faked one by looking at it-
Hallerb's posts may contain just about anything, and that content may be
spelled in any one of numerous ways. Similarly, without having some
witness who can remember Pollock doing a particular "painting".... or a
radiological examination of the "art" that indicates that it dates from
after Pollock's death in 1956, it would be hard to tell whether one was
looking at a Pollock painting- or a section of a messy paint shop's floor.
In much the same way, a computer could be programed to generate "Random
Hallerb Postings" (RHPs) with considerable fidelity to the real item.
I suggest Julian Bordas to program the random spelling part of the program.

Pat

On Thu, 25 Dec 2003 11:42:18 -0600, Pat Flannery wrote:

The real trick would be trying to separate a real Hallerb posting from a
fake one, based on internal content. This would be like trying to tell a
real Jackson Pollock painting from a faked one by looking at it-

No, Pollocks method was not nearly as random as folks think. Hallerb is
far more random, a more appropriate comparison might be to some of John
Cage's stochastic music.

If only Hallerb and some of the others would be inspired by Cage's work
"Silence."