A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Others » UK Astronomy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Astronaughts & Drunkenauts



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 28th 07, 07:49 PM posted to alt.gossip.celebrities,alt.astrology,uk.sci.astronomy,alt.folklore.ghost-stories,alt.prophecies.nostradamus
Cyberiade.it Anonymous Remailer[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 111
Default Astronaughts & Drunkenauts


On Sat 28 Jul 2007 "keyb" wrote:
"Ed Stasiak" in news:
. com...
Daniel Joseph Min wrote

Sibrel put the Bible in front of him and called Aldrin "a coward,
a liar, and a thief". Aldrin punched Sibrel in the face.

You see, Sibrel made the mistake of disrespecting Aldrin's sworn
obligation to secrecy. The point is, you can't blame subordinates
like Aldrin for his understandably panicky, "fight or flight"
overreaction to Sibrel's confrontational ultimatum.


Nonsense, it was neither an overreaction nor was it panicky. Aldrin
was born in 1930 when men were still taught to behave like men and
acted in a perfectly appropriate manner when confronted by this idiot.


http://www.erichufschmid.net/Intervi...rt-Sibrel.html


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

With the caveat to ever-beware the "straw man". Whether he,
she, or they be witting, or unwitting -- maybe somewhere in
between? For example, we do know that no mortal humans have
achieved, sustained, and survived low Earth orbit much above
maybe five (or six hundred?) miles above sea level, maximum.

That much is an absolutely established, incontrovertible fact
which, by itself, completely debunks all "manned" portions of
the hippie-era Apollo moon missions. Clearly, the main reason
that mortal humans cannot exceed low-earth orbit, is because
of the extremely powerful and insurmountable solar radiation.
Anyone who claims the contrary is just plain badly-educated,
whether they be *knowingly* bearing false testimony, or not,
regardless of what their motivations may be. Facts are facts.

As another astute contributor to this discussion in the sci.*
hierarchy has recently (re)iterated, each aspect of each case
must be measured, weighed, and divided, separately on its own
merits. As with Sibrel, I think he's right about some aspects
of the Apollo hoax, but is wrong about other glaring aspects.

For another example, why drag UFOs into it? I'm positive that
many reports of UFOs and related subjects are definitely real,
whether each separate report be accurately interpreted or not,
not only by its witnesses, but also by its investigators. See?

While it's an interesting tangent to the Apollo moon hoax, it
is not directly germane to the case. Everybody knows that the
government routinely engages in all manner of disinformation,
obfuscation, diversion, mass-brainwashing, etc., ad nauseam,
heaping layer upon layer of the aforesaid through the medium
of television most especially, but obviously not exclusively.
Their public schools, their universities, radio, multi-media,
you name it, Big Brother has their tentacles in *everything*,
specifically because they have to own and control everything.
Anything or anyone they don't own and control, they view as a
potential threat. Understand that, and you'll understand them.
You'll understand why there are so many shills ergo straw men
for the government party-line on these usenet newsgroups, and
on millions of internet websites, blogs and discussion boards.

We see plenty of common denominators, identifiable patterns
which empirically emerge from out of their propaganda chaos.
And of these myriad and telling patterns is their redundant
but nonetheless abjectly-failed party-line, where narrators
conclude "I guess we'll never know", "nobody really knows",
"it will have to remain a mystery to all of us" ad nauseam!
You see this same tactic gratuitously interjected in other
discussions of conspiracies, the supernatural, the occult,
prophecies, God or Gods, ad infinitum! It's their trademark.
And since the unwary, their minions, are by nature insecure,
they're most susceptible and deceiveable. They can KEEP IT!

As for conscientious observers, those independently-minded,
particularly for the sovereign not confused nor schismatic,
we *know* already. We *know* that only fools are fooled by
foolers. We've all been the fool, but not all of us remain
the fool. The vigilant move on to bigger and better things...

In Vigilance,
Daniel Joseph Min
http://www.2hot2cool.com/11/danieljosephmin/


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQA/AwUBRquMo5ljD7YrHM/nEQK39gCdF/Vqhc/bJIqijkmZtklQhQCzTIkAn3tx
6dogxAkU32VqUCitRTZ5pSpe
=Sw7D
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Astronaughts & Drunkenauts Intoxi-Nut UK Astronomy 0 July 28th 07 07:01 AM
Astronaughts & Drunkenauts Intoxi-Nut UK Astronomy 0 July 28th 07 04:15 AM
Astronaughts & Drunkenauts Cyberiade.it Anonymous Remailer[_1_] UK Astronomy 0 July 28th 07 02:42 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.