DTG: A New Theory of Gravity Based on Absolute Motion.

"George Dishman" wrote in message
oups.com...
On 3 Jun, 14:42, "kenseto" wrote:
"George Dishman" wrote in message
oups.com...
On 31 May, 14:52, "kenseto" wrote:
"George Dishman" wrote in message
roups.com...

I'll snip a lot as we were at cross purposes.

Consider the following scenario:
1. The universe is an expanding balloon and our galaxy A is
somewhere on
this expanding balloon.

Given that we see matter in every direction, I assume
you mean the two-dimensional surface of the balloon
to represent our three-dimensional universe.

No the universe is three dimensional, the two dimension surface of the
balloon represents the state of the universe at any time.

Isn't that what I just said?

What we see is
being transmitted to us via the distorted E-Strings and the distortion
in
the surrounding E-Strings is due to the absolute motion of the earth.

The unit directional vector for A is +j_a.

OK, j_a would be a vector of unit length drawn on the
surface of the balloon in the direction of motion of
the galaxy.

NO.....j_a is the unit directional vector along the radial line of
expansion
of the universe from the point of the Big Bang.

OK, here's the problem, when you talk of "the Big
Bang" with capitals, it makes it a proper name and
refers to current models, not your own version. In
the Big Bang model there is no centre in space, the
usual balloon model represents the real 3-dimensional
universe with the two dimensions of the surface and
you have to imagine the third being just like those
two.

There is no problem. What I said also agrees with the current interpretation
of the BB. The current BB model says that the universe is expanding in all
directions. The direction of expansion for A is the direction of j_a and
that direction is the radial direction in my model. Back to the balloon
model of the current theory:
1. let's assume that the expanding balloon is the expanding earth and A is
located on the north pole. This means that the unit directional vector of
j_a is pointing north.
2. If B is located on the northern hemisphere of the expanding earth
(balloon). Therefore the directional unit vector j_b of B is also pointing
north. Therefore gravity between A and B is attractive.
3. If B is located on the southern hemisphere of the expanding earth
(balloon). Therefore the directional unit vector j_b is pointing
south....the opposite direction of j_a. Therefore gravity between A and B is
repulsive.

You seem to be talking of an explosion in space which
is quite different:

There is no difference. The same result for both models. The current model
is that space is doing the expansion. This gives rise to the problem that if
space is empty (devoid of material) as asserted by Einstein then how can
empty space can expand and carries the galaxies along with it as it
expands?????


... My model of the BB is that it is
a real explosion and matter particles flying apart from the point of the
BB.