![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
JRS: In article , seen in
news:sci.space.policy, Kevin Willoughby posted at Thu, 30 Oct 2003 19:57:00 :- In article , says... The USA, using 1960's technology, needed under 7.5 years to go from Glenn-in-Mercury to Moon-Landing, with a delay of ?? caused by Apollo I. Yes, but a lot of ground work was done before Glenn's flight. The F-1 design had begun years before. North American was working on the Apollo CSM. Various big Saturns were on the drawing board. It's hard to say just when the US started working on potentially manned spaceflight; but ISTR that little of value was done before the Importation of Wernher von Braun, whenever that was. Under 17 years, maximum. The Chinese have been launching to orbit, including many loads as big as Mercury, since 1970. They have been thinking about the Moon for a considerable while. We may not know all that they have been actively working on. That was when NASA was young, encouraging innovation and wild ideas (flying two Geminis at once, flying Apollo 8, LOR, all-up testing), and willing to take out insurance against the unknowns (when an Agena failed, they just happened to have this little Target Docking gadget sitting in a hanger, heck, the entire Gemini program was both an admission of ignorance and a way of learning what had to be learned before Apollo was flyable). Much of what was learned then is available to everybody now, if they are willing to use it. More important, the quality of the senior management was extraordinary. I'm not aware of a von Bruan in today's NASA, nor a Gilruth, nor a Web, nor a, well, the list goes on. Indeed. And the Chinese could be implementing additional management techniques impractical in the USA - but effective. There in a risk that Forty-Three might want to defend against. -- © John Stockton, Surrey, UK. Turnpike v4.00 MIME. © Web URL:http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/ - FAQqish topics, acronyms & links; some Astro stuff via astro.htm, gravity0.htm; quotes.htm; pascal.htm; &c, &c. No Encoding. Quotes before replies. Snip well. Write clearly. Don't Mail News. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sedna, space probes?, colonies? what's next? | TKalbfus | Policy | 265 | July 13th 04 12:00 AM |
Clueless pundits (was High-flight rate Medium vs. New Heavy lift launchers) | Rand Simberg | Space Science Misc | 18 | February 14th 04 03:28 AM |
Moon key to space future? | James White | Policy | 90 | January 6th 04 04:29 PM |
International Space Station Science - One of NASA's rising stars | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | December 27th 03 01:32 PM |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | September 12th 03 01:37 AM |