A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Others » Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

What if (on those supergiants.)



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 5th 07, 01:25 AM posted to alt.astronomy
G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,860
Default What if (on those supergiants.) They have the most RockPlanets

Why does this idea come out of good science? These blue super giants
came out of the most dense clouds. Had to be very heavy. These great
stars fused very fast,and being 100 times bigger and denser than the Sun
means great gravity. They have 90 planets. some at great distances.
With there stars short life span,and in its end exploding one could
easily say 90 doomed planets,and yet. Lets think of a planet orbiting
around this super blue giant at a distance of half a LY when the
explosion takes place. Lets say this planet is 15 times bigger than
Earth. The great explosion blasted it away at an accelerating rate.
Space is very cold just 2.7 K and it gets a solid surface,and its
thousands of volcanoes bring up great amounts of steam that makes it a
water planet with water covering its surface 30 miles deep. It is warm
water like found in the pools of Yellow stone park. It has much
sulfur,and salt in it. The planet is spinning at a fairly fast rate,and
its great speed has given it much inertia,to add to its 15 times bigger
than the Earth's size. Its waters have great waves that circle the
planet continually. Its sky has only stars that do not give the
appearance of points of light but thin streeks.some long others short.
This planet has balloon type life in its dense atmosphere. It has many
forms of large fish,some 90 times larger than our whale fish. Great
under water forests with snakes huge caterpillars,and octopus are all
white,and its most intelligent animal. All animals have no eyes,but in
reality no need of them. Sound is their eyes They love to touch every
thing. These planets without Suns are not all that rare.They are just
impossible to detect right now,but in 500 years that will all change.
In some respects a planet orbiting a Sun might have a poorer chance. Our
8 other planers prove this,and the best chance for other life is on the
Moon Io Go figure Beeert

  #3  
Old May 5th 07, 01:49 AM posted to alt.astronomy
Phineas T Puddleduck[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,121
Default What if (on those supergiants.) They have the most Rock Planets

In article ,
(G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:

The great explosion blasted it away at an accelerating rate.
Space is very cold just 2.7 K and it gets a solid surface,and its
thousands of volcanoes bring up great amounts of steam that makes it a
water planet with water covering its surface 30 miles deep. It is warm
water like found in the pools of Yellow stone park. It has much
sulfur,and salt in it. The planet is spinning at a fairly fast rate,and
its great speed has given it much inertia,to add to its 15 times bigger
than the Earth's size. Its waters have great waves that circle the
planet continually. Its sky has only stars that do not give the
appearance of points of light but thin streeks.some long others short.
This planet has balloon type life in its dense atmosphere. It has many
forms of large fish,some 90 times larger than our whale fish. Great
under water forests with snakes huge caterpillars,and octopus are all
white,and its most intelligent animal. All animals have no eyes,but in
reality no need of them. Sound is their eyes They love to touch every
thing. These planets without Suns are not all that rare.They are just
impossible to detect right now,but in 500 years that will all change.
In some respects a planet orbiting a Sun might have a poorer chance. Our
8 other planers prove this,and the best chance for other life is on the
Moon Io



Might work for Space: 1999, but in reality its more saucerhead nonsense.

--
Sacred keeper of the Hollow Sphere, and the space within the Coffee Boy
singularity.

COOSN-174-07-82116: alt.astronomy's favourite poster (from a survey taken
of the saucerhead high command).
  #4  
Old May 5th 07, 02:01 AM posted to alt.astronomy
Art Deco[_6_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 796
Default What if (on those supergiants.) They have the most Rock Planets

Phineas T Puddleduck wrote:

In article ,
(G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:

The great explosion blasted it away at an accelerating rate.
Space is very cold just 2.7 K and it gets a solid surface,and its
thousands of volcanoes bring up great amounts of steam that makes it a
water planet with water covering its surface 30 miles deep. It is warm
water like found in the pools of Yellow stone park. It has much
sulfur,and salt in it. The planet is spinning at a fairly fast rate,and
its great speed has given it much inertia,to add to its 15 times bigger
than the Earth's size. Its waters have great waves that circle the
planet continually. Its sky has only stars that do not give the
appearance of points of light but thin streeks.some long others short.
This planet has balloon type life in its dense atmosphere. It has many
forms of large fish,some 90 times larger than our whale fish. Great
under water forests with snakes huge caterpillars,and octopus are all
white,and its most intelligent animal. All animals have no eyes,but in
reality no need of them. Sound is their eyes They love to touch every
thing. These planets without Suns are not all that rare.They are just
impossible to detect right now,but in 500 years that will all change.
In some respects a planet orbiting a Sun might have a poorer chance. Our
8 other planers prove this,and the best chance for other life is on the
Moon Io



Might work for Space: 1999, but in reality its more saucerhead nonsense.


Heh, approved.

--
Supreme Leader of the Brainwashed Followers of Art Deco

"Causation of gravity is missing frame field always attempting
renormalization back to base memory of equalized uniform momentum."
-- nightbat the saucerhead-in-chief

"Of doing Venus in person would obviously incorporate a composite
rigid airship, along with it's internal cache of frozen pizza and
ice cold beer."
-- Brad Guth, bigoted racist
  #5  
Old May 5th 07, 12:42 PM posted to alt.astronomy
G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,860
Default What if (on those supergiants.) They have the most RockPlanets

Duck wit Not nonsense just far out thinking. just using ideas from
denser deep space clouds. Just ideas that a low wit would think don't
make sense Bert

  #7  
Old May 5th 07, 01:50 PM posted to alt.astronomy
G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,860
Default What if (on those supergiants.) They have the most RockPlanets

Duck wit You just don't like me (admit it) and that would clear the
air. You are certain what I have to post makes no sense.,and that makes
you a fool. Only fools are certain. Clever people like to show some
original ideas. They can doubt other imperial thinking. They do it with
good science. They are always looking over the horizon bert

  #10  
Old May 5th 07, 10:00 PM posted to alt.astronomy
BradGuth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21,544
Default What if (on those supergiants.) They have the most Rock Planets

On May 5, 5:50 am, (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:
Duck wit You just don't like me (admit it) and that would clear the
air. You are certain what I have to post makes no sense.,and that makes
you a fool. Only fools are certain. Clever people like to show some
original ideas. They can doubt other imperial thinking. They do it with
good science. They are always looking over the horizon bert


The only mainstream and thus Old Testament "Duck wit" horizon that
matters within this anti-think-tank usenet of theirs, is that pesky
event horizon of their very own intellectual sucking black hole,
that's usually situated between each of their infomercial spewing butt-
cheeks.

Sirius/a/b/c, and of it's extensive Oort cloud of icy debris and
likely moon sized items, is in fact a good enough supergiant at
roughly 3X solar mass. We're also headed that way (again). It's a
mutual gravity force kind of thing, that's sort of hard to ignore
unless you're a certified infomercial spewing "Duck wit".

Of course, our warm and fuzzy usenet blow-hard "Duck wits" typically
don't take kindly to anything (good or bad) that's off-world. (I
believe that's because it's more of their faith-based or politically
skewed nonsense from their incest perverted naysay mindset, than not)
-
Brad Guth

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.