Why are the 'Fixed Stars' so FIXED?

On May 4, 3:46 pm, HW@....(Henri Wilson) wrote:
On 4 May 2007 01:41:03 -0700, George Dishman wrote:

I had another look Henry, it is a fake again! The top is a
cut-off ellipse and you have then drawn a number of dots along
the actual curve by hand.

Of course.

Show a screen capture from your program, state the orbital
parameters and _copy_ the curve onto a composite diagram like
mine showing both luminosity and velocity curves with the
correct relative phasing:

http://www.georgedishman.f2s.com/Henri/EF_Dra.png

You are a charlatan Henry, a plain old fraud.

George, my diagram was never supposed to be accurate. It was
merely demonstrating the basic idea.

That's a pretty pathetic attempt to explain away your forged fit.

Jerry

On 4 May 2007 14:38:09 -0700, Jerry wrote:

On May 4, 3:46 pm, HW@....(Henri Wilson) wrote:
On 4 May 2007 01:41:03 -0700, George Dishman wrote:

I had another look Henry, it is a fake again! The top is a
cut-off ellipse and you have then drawn a number of dots along
the actual curve by hand.

Of course.

Show a screen capture from your program, state the orbital
parameters and _copy_ the curve onto a composite diagram like
mine showing both luminosity and velocity curves with the
correct relative phasing:

http://www.georgedishman.f2s.com/Henri/EF_Dra.png

You are a charlatan Henry, a plain old fraud.

George, my diagram was never supposed to be accurate. It was
merely demonstrating the basic idea.

That's a pretty pathetic attempt to explain away your forged fit.

It wasn't a 'fit', as you call it, at all.
The only FIT around here is the one you are having...

It was just a rough diagram showing the phase of the brightness peak.

You people are really getting quite desperate.

(my hernia is not urgent. I can't even see a surgeon till June 14)


Jerry



www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm

Einstein's Relativity - the greatest HOAX since jesus christ's virgin mother.