Microgravity parable

From Herb Schaltegger:

How ironic that you offer your extrapolation regarding "pretty much
everyone..." while chastising my extrapolation.

This reads as another form of "I'm right/you're wrong", coated with a
heavy tinge of hypocrisy.

And how many posters are publicly supporting your continued games of
semanticism, pedantry, prevarication, equivocation and hand-waving?
None.

But let me guess: the lurkers all support you in email.

Umm, they're not lurking.

Then where are your supporters? Your detractors have had no qualms
about telling you when you're completely out in left field.

All I was saying was that one particular member has a published
webpage that stands in complete agreement with the position I have
been presenting.

(If you really care about my email, I have not gotten any email
support on this. I may have when this topic came up a couple of years
ago, but I don't remember.)

If you've been following the thread
thoroughly you've seen that Jim Oberg's website has a page that fits
in total agreement with what I've been saying here.

So if, by assumption, Jim agrees with the position I have put forward,
one might ask why he has remained silent.

Perhaps he's got you killfiled? Perhaps he has more interesting things
to do these days on the eve of a manned Chinese launch. (And please
spare us any tedium regarding Webster's definition of "eve.")

If anything I post strikes you as tedium, you are free to ignore it.

(3rd Reich lessons learned have previously been provided as to their
application here at sci.space.)


Watch who you're calling a Nazi; Uncle Ashcroft's Patriot Act Though
Police might come tracing your IP address and subpoena your name and
address.

Another excellent example of US government encroachment on the US
Constitution.

But I expect that John Ashcroft is a competent enough attorney to
distinguish between a statement that "lessons were learned in studying
the Nazi's" versus a statement "(whoever) IS a Nazi".


~ CT

Stuf4 wrote:
[snip]

All I was saying was that one particular member has a published
webpage that stands in complete agreement with the position I have
been presenting.

That member does not outline a position of belief that NASA scientists
and astronauts do not understand gravity. So it is not in strict
agreement with your position.

[snip]