![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dyna-Soar on a Atlas-Centaur"?
Hmmmmm, I had only seen the Titan IIIC version. Thanks for the thread. But I have a question. As I recall Gemini used ejection seats for early aborts because the Titan II catastrophically failed in such a way that seats were feasible (slower, smaller fireball), whereas Mecury and Apollo catastrophically failed in such a way that seats were out of the question. How was a crew supposed to get away from the Atlas Centaur in a hurry? IIRC, an escape tower was not fitted to Dyna-Soar and since Atlas would not permit the use of a seat in Mercury, it would seem the same would be the case for Dyna-Soar. AND . . . how was a Dyna-Soar (or MOL) crew supposed to get away from a Titan IIIC? SRBs can fail very quickly and with TONS of nasty debris (recall the Delta at the Cape a few years ago or the Titan III/ IV loss at Vandenburg in the mid 1980's. Also remember the first launch attempt of Ariane V, the SRBs were not the root cause, but the rupture of the solids was spectacular) Thanks and take care . . . John |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Dyna-Soar/Atlas-Centaur | Pat Flannery | Policy | 73 | May 12th 07 10:01 PM |
Dyna Soar and X-33 and MOL, oh my! | Scott Lowther | History | 7 | May 24th 04 06:45 AM |
X 20 Dyna Soar | Rich Godwin | History | 5 | September 18th 03 07:47 PM |
X 20 Dyna Soar | Rich Godwin | Space Science Misc | 0 | September 16th 03 04:35 AM |
X 20 Dyna Soar | Rich Godwin | Science | 0 | September 15th 03 08:35 PM |