Magnetosphere or Gravity; which is in charge?

On 27 Mar 2007 13:19:41 -0700, the following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by :

I can actually see all the mainstream crapolla hitting that status quo
or bust ceiling fan, not to mention seeing all of those brown-nosed
minions as MI/NSA clowns running a amock.

In spite of all the incoming flak that I'm taking on, I would have to
think gravity is in charge, and that's not hardly by any small margin.

Even a black hole's magnetosphere is no significant match against the
good old force of gravity.

For instance, our physically dark and massive moon that's having been
somewhat recently orbiting us so nearby (ever since the last ice age),
and thereby having unavoidably caused so much GW trauma into our
environment, and otherwise having applied tidal and gravitational
energy into the planetology that's below our two left dumbfounded
feet, is simply a much hotter environment in a very DNA lethal rad/rem
TBI sort of way, as having been more so nasty than any portion of the
Van Allen belts could ever hope to become. We can all thank the
god(s) of gravity and physics for having accomplished that task, of
our moon having been and still being the great reactive collector or
morgue of all that's solar and cosmic, plus hosting whatever's
radioactive about itself.

I'll take Thousand Island please. Thanks.
--

Bob C.

"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless

On Mar 28, 6:06 pm, Bob Casanova wrote:
On 27 Mar 2007 13:19:41 -0700, the following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by :





I can actually see all the mainstream crapolla hitting that status quo
or bust ceiling fan, not to mention seeing all of those brown-nosed
minions as MI/NSA clowns running a amock.

In spite of all the incoming flak that I'm taking on, I would have to
think gravity is in charge, and that's not hardly by any small margin.

Even a black hole's magnetosphere is no significant match against the
good old force of gravity.

For instance, our physically dark and massive moon that's having been
somewhat recently orbiting us so nearby (ever since the last ice age),
and thereby having unavoidably caused so much GW trauma into our
environment, and otherwise having applied tidal and gravitational
energy into the planetology that's below our two left dumbfounded
feet, is simply a much hotter environment in a very DNA lethal rad/rem
TBI sort of way, as having been more so nasty than any portion of the
Van Allen belts could ever hope to become. We can all thank the
god(s) of gravity and physics for having accomplished that task, of
our moon having been and still being the great reactive collector or
morgue of all that's solar and cosmic, plus hosting whatever's
radioactive about itself.

I'll take Thousand Island please. Thanks.

I don't have anything that'll suit a Jewish Third Reich mindset, like
yours. Terribly sorry about that.
-
Brad Guth

On 31 Mar 2007 19:04:44 -0700, the following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by :

snip

I don't have anything that'll suit a Jewish Third Reich mindset

Sort of like a Catholic atheist mindset, right?

Moron.
--

Bob C.

"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless

On Mar 26, 8:21 am, The Ghost In The Machine
wrote:

And how do they get there without getting fried, again?

It's called a composite rigid airship, including all the LOx frozen
pizza and ice cold beer that you can possibly drink.

Such a interplantary ship would be surrounded by a great deal of mass,
such as provided by all those tonnes upon tonnes of pizza and beer.
The required meters worth of such shielding and/or surrounding tankage
that'll be hauling the likes of slush h2o2 plus a little of whatever
else goes bang, would obviously be built to suit.

Because of the to/from travel time being a wee bit of a commute,
sleeping extensively in massive coffins (spinning if need be) should
further improve the odds of our frail DNA surviving.

Once cruising efficiently below them acidic clouds, and well enough
below that pesky layer of S8, say cruising along at perhaps 25 km, is
going to represent far less solar and/or cosmic TBI dosage than being
butt naked on the surface of Earth. (I'm thinking of keeping this
composite rigid airship extensively within the nighttime season)

Understand, I'm not suggesting we set a naked hot foot on that
geothermally toasty deck, unless you want to go first.
-
Brad Guth

Our moon is still measurably salty, and Mars is not nearly salty
enough.

Mars is simply not hardly indicating as having been a slaty planet,
and it's otherwise indicating as much older than Earth. What gives?

I happen to agree with "Andrew Nowicki", that not one but many
significant impacting events must have morphed, iced down and
otherwise having so extensively salted the surface of Earth. Of
course, there's no such proof that Earth originated within this solar
system, and there's even less proof pertaining to our salty moon.
Mars seems much older than Earth, and Venus seems much less old than
Earth. What gives?

How much if any sial is on that deck of our physically dark and nasty
moon?

How much of a planetology and/or moon common element does salt account
for?

At times of such an icy proto-moon representing itself as an incoming
NEO, as likely having previously passed so close to impacting, it must
have seemed exactly like the end of the world to many, and actually
becoming the end of the world to many others caught in its gravity and
aerobraking wake. The actual glancing blow of that icy sucker upon
having accomplished its dastardly deed, whereas I'd have to think a
good third of most everything living upon this Earth would have been
killed off or traumatised well enough past the point of no return.

That "true geology" specified date of 11,700 BP also sounds just about
right on the money for the final lithobraking, ocean basin creating,
antipode worthy and seasonal tilt causing arrival of our moon, which
should have seriously kicked all sorts of planetology as well as human
butt upon its icy arrival. At the very least the near miss of such an
icy proto-moon should have been downright interesting, if not a touch
lethal for a great many.

There should also have been those significant teratonne spacebergs of
moon ice falling upon Earth for a few thousands of years past the time
of that initial glancing blow.

BTW; there's still nothing contained in any bible or koran, as
reasonably interpreted to our environment having that moon as of prior
to 10,000 BC (12,007 BP), or even of somewhat earlier or perhaps a bit
more recently. When exactly was the first humanly made record of our
moon?

What do you folks think about complex intelligent ET life, as for such
having survived their extended interstellar trek, as safely coexisting
within a few of those proto-moon ice caves? (I know that even I could
do as much [how about yourself?])

Within such a deep enough icy moon cave (assuming all the way down to
the moon's surface) would have accommodated all the essential elements
for survival, including sufficient isolation from the bad sorts of
cosmic and solar radiation, and otherwise having provided loads of
easily accessible O2 for sustaining our kind of frail DNA/RNA.

I'm thinking our moon could have been covered by as much as a 262 km
thick layer of salty ice, of which obviously lost much of its icy load
upon encountering Earth, and especially that of our 1AU nearby solar
energy would have summarily evaporated and/or having solar wind
extracted all such vapors of salty ice that wasn't otherwise safely
sequestered underground.

That pesky GW traumatising moon of ours is still in the process of
losing the remainders of its naked surface element of sodium. (not
nearly enough gravity nor having a worthy magnetosphere as to
otherwise prevent the loss of such ice and sodium)

Too bad the faith-based souls of this Earth are so afraid of their own
shadows. Too bad we still haven't accomplished the Earth/moon science
platform as efficiently station-keeping itself within the moon's
interactive L1 sweet spot. Too bad we're headed directly for WWIII
over the remains of the affordably accessible worth of our global
energy domination (including yellowcake) policy. Too bad that so many
innocent folks have paid the ultimate price, with lots more about to
pay their's (especially nasty if being Muslim is the only option
within their established family traditions).
-
Brad Guth

On Apr 1, 5:08 pm, Bob Casanova wrote:
On 31 Mar 2007 19:04:44 -0700, the following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by :

snip

I don't have anything that'll suit a Jewish Third Reich mindset

Sort of like a Catholic atheist mindset, right?

Right as rain, especially if you had been one of those nice (very much
Christ like) Cathars.

Mainstream religions clearly don't much care for anyone that can't
manage to tell or otherwise hold onto their fair share of lies, and
without so much as a speck of remorse. That's what makes goverment
such a nifty puppet of theirs, as being born-again liars is pretty
much what government is all about.
-
Brad Guth

On 7 Apr 2007 14:02:19 -0700, the following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by :

On Apr 1, 5:08 pm, Bob Casanova wrote:
On 31 Mar 2007 19:04:44 -0700, the following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by :

snip

I don't have anything that'll suit a Jewish Third Reich mindset

Sort of like a Catholic atheist mindset, right?

Right as rain, especially if you had been one of those nice (very much
Christ like) Cathars.

Mainstream religions clearly don't much care for anyone that can't
manage to tell or otherwise hold onto their fair share of lies, and
without so much as a speck of remorse. That's what makes goverment
such a nifty puppet of theirs, as being born-again liars is pretty
much what government is all about.

You have an...interesting...outlook. How do you manage to
not suicide?
--

Bob C.

"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless