Venus is not too hot to touch with the Ovglove

OOPS! Now I've gone and insulted the Ovgolve cult of mindless
morons. Sorry about that.

Perhaps Venus is simply too freaking hot to touch, even with the
Ovglove.

Within an average of having been losing 20.5 w/m2, this represents
that some areas of the Venus surface are perhaps worth less than a w/
m2, with other areas radiating at perhaps 200 w/m2, and of course more
than a few active mud, lava and gas vents contributing their energy at
many thousands of watts per square meter.

So, the Ovglove applications are at best spotty, and along with the IR
CCD or most likely using of some other thermally tolerant instrument
of such technology at hand, there's no good reason to think of our
having to walk on those extra toasty locations where the heat of
what's geothermally forced is excessively pushing the limits of those
EVA Ovglove suits as intended and thus configured for keeping their
folks cool.

Technically it is much tougher to get rid of surplus heat than it is
for insulating yourself from the cold. However, the double IR/FIR
environment of our daytime moon that's physically dark and nasty in
more ways than passive heat, such as for benefiting those sorts of
robust robotic instruments that'll have to survive the solar IR plus
all of the locally reflected IR and of the secondary/recoil worth of
the mid and far infrared(FIR), should more than apply to this
application of such robotics and perhaps a few brave souls safely
accomplishing Venus. In fact the moon's secondary/recoil worth of
what's near, mid and far infrared combined is likely worth every bit
as much as the solar influx, though fortunately our Venus surface by
season of nighttime is without solar IR to begin with, and even by day
there's not all that much solar IR that ever reaches that S8 and
acidic h2o cloud protected surface.

There's obviously more to behold and appreciate about all the NIR, MIF
and FIR spectrums of our universe than there is from our biologically
limited if not evolution deprived visual spectrum (there are bugs,
more than a few other significant species including birds that
actually see much better than us humans)
http://www.ipac.caltech.edu/Outreach...irregions.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infrared

Our seeing by night while exploring or otherwise doing our business of
depositing or extracting whatever from Venus is not the least bit of a
compromise, or is it outside of most any thermal environment spec.
Cruising Venus by way of a suitable composite rigid airship is just
downright nifty, and rather energy efficient to boot.
-
Brad Guth

In article . com,
wrote:

OOPS! Now I've gone and

spouted another load of incoherent screed?

--
Painius admits he cannot answer a single question to NB:

"Yes, you're right of course, NB. And they get very useless very quickly.
I shall do my best to ignore them, as you wish."

On Apr 5, 11:09 am, Phineas T Puddleduck
wrote:
In article . com,

wrote:
OOPS! Now I've gone and

spouted another load of incoherent screed?


Can I use your topic/author stalking as any indication of Third Reich
(aka Skull and Bones) brown-nosed minionship?

I mean, obviously you and others of your silly kind are supposedly all-
knowing clowns, yet somewhat unable to constructively contribute or
much less sharing anything in scientific specifics, other than your
infomercial spewed crapolla that's more Old Testament thumping or
otherwise Jewish faith-based than not.

How much of Hitler is within your DNA/RNA? (or is that a clown's
secret?)
-
Brad Guth

In article .com,
wrote:

Can I use your topic/author stalking as any indication of

your amazing talent for self deception....

--
Painius admits he cannot answer a single question to NB:

"Yes, you're right of course, NB. And they get very useless very quickly.
I shall do my best to ignore them, as you wish."

On Apr 6, 11:02 am, Phineas T Puddleduck
wrote:
In article .com,

wrote:
Can I use your topic/author stalking as any indication of

your amazing talent for self deception....

So, you are the son of Hitler, or perhaps of whatever's worse.

Your topic/author stalking profile is rather to the point, isn't it.

Can you name a soul that you've assisted in getting past go? (didn't
think so)
-
Brad Guth

In article .com,
wrote:

So, you are

sick of hearing your BS? Yes.

--
Painius admits he cannot answer a single question to NB:

"Yes, you're right of course, NB. And they get very useless very quickly.
I shall do my best to ignore them, as you wish."

wrote:

On Apr 5, 11:09 am, Phineas T Puddleduck
wrote:
In article . com,

wrote:
OOPS! Now I've gone and

spouted another load of incoherent screed?


Can I use your topic/author stalking as any indication of Third Reich
(aka Skull and Bones) brown-nosed minionship?

In GuthWorld:

Not replying to Brad's nonsense means that he is being suppressed by
NI6/NSA.

Replying to Brad's nonsense means that he is being subjected to
topic/author stalking.

--
Supreme Leader of the Brainwashed Followers of Art Deco

"Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, Deco?
The section is clearly attributed to Art Deco, not to you, Deco."
-- Dr. David Tholen

"Who is "David Tholen", Daedalus? Still suffering from
attribution problems?"
-- Dr. David Tholen

Where's all the supposed "right stuff"?

Isn't there even some of Usenet's wussy stuff to spare?

Is Usenet's brain back in lock-down nondisclosure mode once again?
-
Brad Guth

On Apr 6, 5:16 pm, wrote:

Where's all the supposed "right stuff"?

Isn't there even some of Usenet's wussy right stuff to spare?

Is Usenet's brain back in lock-down/nondisclosure mode once again?
-
Brad Guth

Why is Venus (unless it's simply not nearly as old as Earth) so
geothermally hot and otherwise toasty from the core?

What about all the atmospheric S8, as honestly interpreted by John
Ackerman?
-
Brad Guth