A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Summary of Theory of Everything



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 3rd 07, 01:58 AM posted to sci.physics,sci.physics.particle,sci.physics.relativity,sci.astro
JanPB
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 74
Default Summary of Theory of Everything

On Apr 2, 10:19 am, wrote:
There is this thing that physicists have regarding charge, that is
just such an ingrained concept, from the standard model, that only by
really asking yourself what is charge, can you get past that concept.

If, in your analysis of charge, you end up with "Well it is a
fundamental property of"

Then stop and analyze what you are actually saying.

You are saying it is a decree.


No, no. All Uncle Al is saying is that any theory that claims to
replace some current one must be at least AS GOOD which simply means:
it must predict all the experimental results the old theory predicted.
Uncle A. posted a sample list of results any new theory must predict
or else it's just hand waving.

--
Jan Bielawski

  #2  
Old April 3rd 07, 02:27 AM posted to sci.physics,sci.physics.particle,sci.physics.relativity,sci.astro
Androcles
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 260
Default Summary of Theory of Everything


"JanPB" wrote in message oups.com...
On Apr 2, 10:19 am, wrote:
There is this thing that physicists have regarding charge, that is
just such an ingrained concept, from the standard model, that only by
really asking yourself what is charge, can you get past that concept.

If, in your analysis of charge, you end up with "Well it is a
fundamental property of"

Then stop and analyze what you are actually saying.

You are saying it is a decree.


No, no. All Uncle Al is saying is that any theory that claims to
replace some current one must be at least AS GOOD


Uncle Stooopid is a ****in' dickhead, like you, only he's
the biggest tord in the river of ****.
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonde...leStooopid.htm


  #3  
Old April 3rd 07, 04:45 AM posted to sci.physics,sci.physics.particle,sci.physics.relativity,sci.astro,alt.usenet.kooks
Art Deco[_6_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 796
Default Summary of Theory of Everything

Androcles wrote:

"JanPB" wrote in message
roups.com...
On Apr 2, 10:19 am, wrote:
There is this thing that physicists have regarding charge, that is
just such an ingrained concept, from the standard model, that only by
really asking yourself what is charge, can you get past that concept.

If, in your analysis of charge, you end up with "Well it is a
fundamental property of"

Then stop and analyze what you are actually saying.

You are saying it is a decree.


No, no. All Uncle Al is saying is that any theory that claims to
replace some current one must be at least AS GOOD


Uncle Stooopid is a ****in' dickhead, like you, only he's
the biggest tord in the river of ****.
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonde...leStooopid.htm


How would you know? Don't you have him safely plonked?

--
Supreme Leader of the Brainwashed Followers of Art Deco

"To err is human, to cover it up is Weasel" -- Dogbert
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Summary of my Perseid Images Ian Sharp UK Astronomy 0 August 13th 05 02:48 PM
SUMMARY: X-ray Event exceeded M5 Sam Wormley Amateur Astronomy 0 July 13th 05 04:43 PM
NOT your Father's Satellite -- Summary [7] Painius Misc 12 June 23rd 05 01:25 PM
Bush Speech - AP Summary Andrew Gray Policy 6 January 15th 04 03:02 PM
Planets Summary from Heavens-Above Bill Tschumy Amateur Astronomy 2 August 25th 03 06:58 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.