![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 2, 6:19 pm, wrote:
There is this thing that physicists have regarding charge, that is just such an ingrained concept, from the standard model, that only by really asking yourself what is charge, can you get past that concept. If, in your analysis of charge, you end up with "Well it is a fundamental property of" Then stop and analyze what you are actually saying. You are saying it is a decree. And if you are decreeing that a thing is, just is and we must accept that it is, then perhaps you haven't examined it enough yet. Lets suppose I say, well no good sir, it is not charge, fundamentally it is fairies. That was the original decree, fairy magic. Fairy magic is a fundamental aspect of the universe, and we must just accept that it is. We must start with that precept and go on from there. It is the fairy magic, which endows an electron with its charge. And also likewise it endows the positron, with its positive charge. This attraction being just its nature. My point is this. An electron, is not what it appears to be. At the time that people came up with the idea of charge, a charge of powder in a cannon they didn't know much about atomic processes. The idea that one thing can just have this invisible quality, that makes it negative and another invisible quality that makes another positive, means that it has some special gifted property or some decreed behavior or some sort of quality for the purpose of accomplishing some thing, rather than just being that way for itself. A negative charge would be useless without a positive charge existing also in the universe. And then you might as well say that the universe was made by design. And if so, then that is quite simple to say that God made electrons negative and positrons positive and we dare not ask why or what it is in its true essence. It has a quality that effects a result. It is such a difficult thing to explain why it is just plain wrong. I just don't believe, that an electron, can be told, to just be negative by decree. I do not buy into the idea of it as being just that way fundamentally, like it has a special unique quality to it that we must accept on blind faith. If, some giant alien or God created the universe, and put some liquid in the void, and flipped a switch, and it inflated until it filled with foam, ok, I can buy into that. I can accept that the universe is merely governed by forces and at its root, is this quantum foam which keeps it together by its own tensile strength. You see the problem with physic today, is they have a fixation on electricity. And hence try to explain the entire universe with concepts such as charge. Yet charge does not affect absolute space-time. Only mass does. So your electron without mass, is going to have a difficult time, affecting a nucleus which has mass. And gravity which can affect mass, has only one pole. Anyways the point I wanted to make was simply to ask yourself about charge, and what it might be, and if you arrive at the conclusion that it is a fundamental property, a magic property, then think of something more tangible. Because it that is magic and by decree by God then it might as well all be. I just do not believe that an electron is anything more, than a spherical wave in the ether. The idea, that it is a little substance, with mass, rotating around a nucleus, is just pure fantasy. What could possibly keep it in orbit and hasn't that been thrown out as a half baked idea? The only thing, that could keep a little substance like that rotating around a nucleus is fairy magic. An electron is a spread out smeared out thing. The standard model uses the idea of a point particle, to freeze the frame and study points, that does not endow a bit of energy, a wave crest, with any substance. It is absolute space-time, which moves around and waves travel through it. Like frame dragging or lensing. So it is easy to be mislead, into thinking that if the trajectory curves, it must be because it has mass and is being affected by gravity. That is like saying a photon curves around the sun because of gravity. Gravity is exerting a pull on that photon. Well thats not the case. The photon is traveling in space-time and space-time is being affected by gravity. And the EM spectrum includes all things electrical and magnetic including electrons. They are no different than a photon. And a photon has no mass. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Summary of my Perseid Images | Ian Sharp | UK Astronomy | 0 | August 13th 05 02:48 PM |
SUMMARY: X-ray Event exceeded M5 | Sam Wormley | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | July 13th 05 04:43 PM |
NOT your Father's Satellite -- Summary [7] | Painius | Misc | 12 | June 23rd 05 01:25 PM |
Bush Speech - AP Summary | Andrew Gray | Policy | 6 | January 15th 04 03:02 PM |
Planets Summary from Heavens-Above | Bill Tschumy | Amateur Astronomy | 2 | August 25th 03 06:58 PM |