A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Summary of Theory of Everything



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #9  
Old April 2nd 07, 06:39 PM posted to sci.physics,sci.physics.particle,sci.physics.relativity,sci.astro
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 165
Default Summary of Theory of Everything

On Apr 2, 6:19 pm, wrote:
There is this thing that physicists have regarding charge, that is
just such an ingrained concept, from the standard model, that only by
really asking yourself what is charge, can you get past that concept.

If, in your analysis of charge, you end up with "Well it is a
fundamental property of"

Then stop and analyze what you are actually saying.

You are saying it is a decree.

And if you are decreeing that a thing is, just is and we must accept
that it is, then perhaps you haven't examined it enough yet.

Lets suppose I say, well no good sir, it is not charge, fundamentally
it is fairies.
That was the original decree, fairy magic.

Fairy magic is a fundamental aspect of the universe, and we must just
accept that it is.

We must start with that precept and go on from there.

It is the fairy magic, which endows an electron with its charge.

And also likewise it endows the positron, with its positive charge.

This attraction being just its nature.

My point is this.

An electron, is not what it appears to be. At the time that people
came up with the idea of charge, a charge of powder in a cannon they
didn't know much about atomic processes.

The idea that one thing can just have this invisible quality, that
makes it negative and another invisible quality that makes another
positive, means that it has some special gifted property or some
decreed behavior or some sort of quality for the purpose of
accomplishing some thing, rather than just being that way for itself.

A negative charge would be useless without a positive charge existing
also in the universe. And then you might as well say that the universe
was made by design.
And if so, then that is quite simple to say that God made electrons
negative and positrons positive and we dare not ask why or what it is
in its true essence.

It has a quality that effects a result.

It is such a difficult thing to explain why it is just plain wrong.

I just don't believe, that an electron, can be told, to just be
negative by decree.

I do not buy into the idea of it as being just that way fundamentally,
like it has a special unique quality to it that we must accept on
blind faith.

If, some giant alien or God created the universe, and put some liquid
in the void, and flipped a switch, and it inflated until it filled
with foam, ok, I can buy into that. I can accept that the universe is
merely governed by forces and at its root, is this quantum foam which
keeps it together by its own tensile strength.

You see the problem with physic today, is they have a fixation on
electricity.

And hence try to explain the entire universe with concepts such as
charge. Yet charge does not affect absolute space-time.
Only mass does.
So your electron without mass, is going to have a difficult time,
affecting a nucleus which has mass.
And gravity which can affect mass, has only one pole.

Anyways the point I wanted to make was simply to ask yourself about
charge, and what it might be, and if you arrive at the conclusion that
it is a fundamental property, a magic property, then think of
something more tangible. Because it that is magic and by decree by God
then it might as well all be.


I just do not believe that an electron is anything more, than a
spherical wave in the ether.

The idea, that it is a little substance, with mass, rotating around a
nucleus, is just pure fantasy.

What could possibly keep it in orbit and hasn't that been thrown out
as a half baked idea?

The only thing, that could keep a little substance like that rotating
around a nucleus is fairy magic.

An electron is a spread out smeared out thing.

The standard model uses the idea of a point particle, to freeze the
frame and study points,
that does not endow a bit of energy, a wave crest, with any substance.

It is absolute space-time, which moves around and waves travel through
it.
Like frame dragging or lensing.

So it is easy to be mislead, into thinking that if the trajectory
curves, it must be because it has mass and is being affected by
gravity.
That is like saying a photon curves around the sun because of gravity.
Gravity is exerting a pull on that photon.
Well thats not the case. The photon is traveling in space-time and
space-time is being affected by gravity.
And the EM spectrum includes all things electrical and magnetic
including electrons.
They are no different than a photon. And a photon has no mass.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Summary of my Perseid Images Ian Sharp UK Astronomy 0 August 13th 05 02:48 PM
SUMMARY: X-ray Event exceeded M5 Sam Wormley Amateur Astronomy 0 July 13th 05 04:43 PM
NOT your Father's Satellite -- Summary [7] Painius Misc 12 June 23rd 05 01:25 PM
Bush Speech - AP Summary Andrew Gray Policy 6 January 15th 04 03:02 PM
Planets Summary from Heavens-Above Bill Tschumy Amateur Astronomy 2 August 25th 03 06:58 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.