![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 28 Mar, 01:50, HW@....(Henri Wilson) wrote:
.... Whether or not cepheids are really huff-puff stars doesn't matter. We say their brightness variations are due to c+v effects caused by their surfaces moving in and out. A brightess curve produced that way is likely to be similar to that for a star in elliptical orbit. What ????? For years you have been saying that Cepheids were plain constant-luminosity stars and the variation was due to c+v effects because they are in binary systems that have not been recognised as such. If you are now switching to say they are single stars, why on Earth would your software be modelling binary systems and restricting the solutions to Keplerian orbits when the motion of the surface is due to internal pressure? I think it is my turn to say you are getting very confused Henry. George |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Fixed for a price? | [email protected] | Amateur Astronomy | 5 | May 18th 05 06:33 PM |
Spirit Fixed! | Greg Crinklaw | UK Astronomy | 1 | January 25th 04 02:56 AM |
Spirit Fixed! | Greg Crinklaw | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | January 24th 04 08:09 PM |
I think I got it fixed now. | Terrence Daniels | Space Shuttle | 0 | July 2nd 03 07:53 PM |
I think I got it fixed now. | Terrence Daniels | Policy | 0 | July 2nd 03 07:53 PM |