Why are the 'Fixed Stars' so FIXED?

"Henri Wilson" HW@.... wrote in message ...
On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 07:12:27 GMT, "Androcles"
wrote:


"Henri Wilson" HW@.... wrote in message ...
On 25 Mar 2007 07:36:34 -0700, "Jerry" wrote:

On Mar 25, 2:41 am, "Jerry" wrote:

Actually, of course, they orbit around their common
barycenter, so what's the big deal?

It is very BIG.

It means I don't need anywhere near as much extinction to explain the distance
anomaly. Orbit pitch can also be included in the equation.

What's this, Wilson?
How can you get pitch from a point source, Wilson?
All orbits are edge-on, Wilson, you said so.
In fact you don't need ANY extinction, it is ALL explained by pitch,
you stupid old wabo.

ALL right...you fluked the right explanation....BUT YOU DIDN'T KNOW WHY.....
AND STILL DON'T.


Stupid old wabo, I've been modelling variables since 1987, of course I know.

Here's a real fluke, look, a huff-puff star just happens to have a Keplerian
orbit, found from it's velocity curve:
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonde.../Analemmae.htm

What a strange coincidence, eh?
Perhaps the data was faked to make it look like a Keplerian orbit.


"When a true genius appears in the world, you may know
him by this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him."
--Jonathan Swift.


1) Frustra fit per plura, quod fieri potest per pauciora.
It is vain to do with more what can be done with less.
-- William of Ockham circa 1288 - 1348

Translation:
Forget extinction and uni****ation, put in the pitch you know is there.


2) We are to admit no more causes of natural things than such as are both true and sufficient to explain their appearances. -- Sir Isaac Newton, 1643 - 1727

Translation:
Forget extinction and uni****ation, put in the pitch you know is there.


3) Everything should be as psychotic as possible, but not simpler. --Albert Einstein 1879 - 1955
Translation:
Add in extinction and uni****ation, make is as complicated as it can be
and pretend light travels at one speed only.

Of course the dunces are in confederacy against me, you are one
of them. You are as daft as Tom and Jeery, Phuckwit Duck, Blind Poe, Dishwater, Tusseladd, Jako Epke [Old Man], Dork Van de fumble mumbler... oops... I take that back, nobody is as daft as Dork.

But... no need to feel bad, old chap, even Galileo was wrong.

"Among the great men who have philosophized about [the action of the tides], the one who surprised me most is Kepler. He was a person of independent genius, [but he] became interested in the action of the moon on the water, and in other occult phenomena, and similar childishness. "
http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~...s/Galileo.html

The moon causing tides is childishness.... I don't think so.

However, uni****ation is childishness when the answer is plain.

Quit ****ing around with the speed of light and program in pitch,

it is all so simple, even Sagnac.

http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonde.../Sagnac/Z1.gif

http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonde...nac/Sagnac.htm