Venus EXPRESS is alive, as is the planet and Guth Venus

" wrote in message


Brad Guth wrote:
"Brad Guth" wrote in message
news:54cee22f660f7b681af90688e329729b.49644@mygate .mailgate.org

Good Christ almighty, is this one a good mainstream status quo boat
rocking topic or what.

You're one of those people who makes bad out of everything.

OK, if the truth and nothing but the truth is qualified as bad new
within your NASA/Apollo koran, then so be it.

I simply believe in WYSIWYG, and otherwise believe in those bits of
replicated science that goes along with those pesky regular laws of
physics, which obviously goes against most everything you folks believe
in.

Sorry about all that.
-
Brad Guth



--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG

"Laan ten Strontridderke" wrote in message
news
And when he's not avoiding pertinent questions.


"pertinent questions" that are topic related, such as??????

BTW; I want answers, not your silly loaded questions. Or, is that
simply too much to ask of such an Old Testament faith based borg
collective?
-
Brad Guth


--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG

On Mar 11, 1:17 pm, "Brad Guth" wrote:
"BradGuth" wrote in message

news:3620067d6ed0e58138be432cab2f4a12.49644@mygate .mailgate.org

Silly Art ****o doing his/her/whatever ****ology thing of topic/author
stalking and bashing. Gee whiz folks, what a silly surprise.

There's real ESA/express science to behold that's new and improved, as
pertaining to Venus, and yet the MI/NSA spook mindset of mostly damage
control is as good as it gets.

You few and far between honest folks (none Jewish media) just need to
look upon that rather nifty image of Venus that I've provided, and
that's sharing by far more than enough to honestly argue about.
-BradGuth

Obviously the naysay focus and/or intent of this anti-think-tank of
such a hocus-pocus Usenet from Old Testament hell doesn't care to
discuss and/or much less share and share alike.

The ongoing infomercial buttology of folks here is clearly what sucks
and blows, just as I've stipulated being the case from the very get-
go.

The truth and nothing but the truth doesn't hardly stand a chance in
hell, much less within this NASA/Apollo sucking Usenet that more brown-
nosed than not.

That nifty image (of 36 looks/pixel) of a community of obviously large
scale and fairly complex structures upon Venus is in fact quite real,
and it's by far the best available pixel truth in town.
-
Brad Guth

Lo and behold; ESAs Venus EXPRESS mission is dead, and apparently I
alone killed it.

Of course, they could always trun that nifty and otherwise robust PFS
instrument back on, and subsequently knock our socks off.

Too bad there's so much ongoing official damage control about Venus,
especially that nifty part about there having been other intelligent
life on Venus.
-
Brad Guth

wrote:

Lo and behold; ESAs Venus EXPRESS mission is dead, and apparently I
alone killed it.

Of course, they could always trun that nifty and otherwise robust PFS
instrument back on, and subsequently knock our socks off.

Too bad there's so much ongoing official damage control about Venus,
especially that nifty part about there having been other intelligent
life on Venus.

There certainly isn't any intelligent life sitting in front of your
computer, Brad.

--
Supreme Leader of the Brainwashed Followers of Art Deco

"To err is human, to cover it up is Weasel" -- Dogbert

On Mar 18, 10:21 am, wrote:
Lo and behold; ESAs Venus EXPRESS mission is dead, and apparently I
alone killed it.

Of course, they could always trun that nifty and otherwise robust PFS
instrument back on, and subsequently knock our socks off.

Too bad there's so much ongoing official damage control about Venus,
especially that nifty part about there having been other intelligent
life on Venus.
-BradGuth

The warm and fuzzy likes of "David Johnson" is yet another infomercial
spewing naysayer, as from the very get-go he'd much rather believe in
anything and absolutely everything as promoted or published by or
otherwise media/infomercial approved of by our NASA teams of all-
knowing wizards. Obviously his kind of silly topic contribution is
simply another total fabricated lie, as bogus as were all of those
Muslim WMD, so what's actually new?

At the very least, the newish and thus active planetology of Venus
offers us loads more of just about anything and everything under the
sun, that is unless you're a certified Usenet naysay moron (aka Old
Testament fart), in which case even Earth sucks (especially those
parts occupied by Muslims).

The regular laws of physics apply, as do the results of replicated
science. Unfortunately, none of that hardly matters when you're still
trying to pull off or otherwise justify the ultimate grand ruse/sting
of our mutually perpetrated cold-war century, and otherwise trying to
pillage and rape mother Earth for all she's worth, and then some.

Guth Venus site #2 and #3 are considerably more subjective
interpretations than of the Guth Venus site No.1. There's only
perfectly good enough reasons to consider these other two sites as
being most likely what I've suggested, even though there simply is not
sufficient resolution for most of us to deal with.
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/new-sites.html
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-town.htm

If I'd applied better PhotoShop, as such the surrounding terrain of
what's most likely of hot rock and whatever's the local soil or
perhaps of all of that supposed melted lead (though why the hell not
melted gold) would become as equally enhanced as for the village or
township like setting that's hosting all of those extremely
interesting structures and infrastructure. Even the small 1:1 crop of
raw pixel information is simply good enough image information to
suggest upon intelligent other life existing/coexisting upon Venus.

If you folks simply can't be bothered as to sharing an honestly open
mindset, then I most certainly can't be bothered as to try any honest
efforts at sharing whatever little I happen to know is worth sharing.

Such image interpretations are not easy (just ask our resident warlord
about all of those WMD that turned out being every bit as stealth as
Usama bin Laden). Your best interpretations are in fact going to be
different than mine, which really doesn't bother myself as long as you
are honestly trying to see the potential of whatever's within the
original 36 look/pixel image (that's similar to 36 stacks of a given
CCD composite image) are having to suggest as to a reasonably positive
or yaysay mindset.

In other words, if you folks start yourself off within the usual
mainstream naysay boxed mindset, you might as well forget about
whatever's within the image interpretation of even appreciating all of
those surrounding hot rocks, because no matters what, in that case
nothing whatsoever counts, just as though you're Amish or perhaps
Muslim about such photographs, yet you'll believe each and every NASA/
Apollo related photograph is God's truth and nothing but the truth,
that pertains to such representing the one and only real thing. (go
figure)
-
Brad Guth