a second race to the moon!!!!

with the Chineese and the Americans both with
plans to put Men/Women on the moon, there`s
some similarities with the first race to the moon.

over the next year and a half theres plans to launch
5 Lunar Orbiters Japan, India, China and America

2007
Chang'e 1 - 17 April 2007 - CAST (China) Lunar Orbiter
SELENE - August 2007 - Lunar Orbiter
Chandrayaan-1 - September 2007 - ISRO (India) Lunar Orbiter
Lunar-A - Late 2007 - Lunar Orbiter and Penetrators
2008
Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter - October 2008 - Lunar Orbiter

"Simon" wrote in message


China only has to accomplish the moon's L1, with a sufficient science
platform that'll hold onto that one and only sweet spot for the task of
accommodating their future LSE-CM/ISS (lunar space elevator with the 1e9
m3 CM/ISS and the tether dipole element that could be allowed to reach
to within 4r of Earth).

The first man/woman on the moon is still a future goal, that could be
accomplished as soon as there's a viable lunar lander having sufficient
shielding and those essential momentum reaction wheels. Accomplished by
earthshine is perhaps the one and only EVA alternative, and even at
that, whomever walks on that moon of ours may require the backup plan of
having banked bone marrow.

It will soon become essential that future resources of lunar yellowcake
(which could be easily off-world or locally processed to being 90% pure)
and of our extracting He3 for the sake of sustaining our terrestrial
needs for cleaner and affordable energy without involving wars. Energy,
if not being allowed as for being extracted directly or taken indirectly
from the solar influx, or via other clean terrestrial alternatives such
as wind, stirling and PV, as such we will then have to derive this need
of clean energy as either directly from our moon or at the very least as
taken from the tether dipole element.
-
Brad Guth


--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG

"Simon" wrote in message


Now these pesky Usenet MIB are into diverting if not shutting down as
much of my access to Mailgate/Usenet as possible, as though somehow
that's a viable tactic that's going to alter the truth and nothing but
the truth, and thus save thy infomercial spewing butts. Keeping such
hot topics off their publicly accessed index is also another rather
pathetic ruse, wouldn't you say.

In addition to all that's clearly ongoing as having been officially
MI/NSA orchestrated as taboo/nondisclosure (damage-control) about most
anything Venus, it seems there's still more bad news that we can all use
about our silly moon which hasn't quite been walked upon.

NASA insiders expose Apollo Hoax / banished from Mailgate

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...2a2ea85ea88d70

http://mygate.mailgate.org/mynews/sc...smart&p=1/1963

If these pro-NASA folks accept the fundamental notions that our warm and
fuzzy NASA/Apollo can manage to have photographed our moon's physically
dark terrain along with mother Earth as coexisting within the same FOV,
and especially interesting is of their Kodak film's DR(dynamic range) as
having rather easily recorded portions of our dark oceans that are worth
an albedo of perhaps 0.1 (entirely similar enough as to the moon
itself), whereas the absolute impressive and somewhat blue/violet peak
spectrum as representing the vibrance of Venus should have been
unavoidably recorded as well. Especially well recorded via those
unfiltered optics that should otherwise have been nearly if not
overloaded with such a gauntlet of all those extra near-UV and UV-a
spectrums worth of photons as having reacted rather nicely with those
highly reflective clouds which offers us the visual albedo of 0.7~0.8 to
work with, whereas the actual peak solar spectrum energy and roughly
reflecting 75% of that 4 kw/m2 is what the naked and unfiltered Kodak
eye had to deal with.

Yet lo and behold, not even from orbit or otherwise from those supposed
EVAs upon the deck had there once been any sign of Venus, much less of
any other significant planets, as well as never once accommodating the
bluish-white vibrant speck of the Sirius star system, all of which were
well within the DR(dynamic range) of those unfiltered Kodak moments, yet
as though such entirely significant items that should have been easily
recorded were never once to be seen (especially odd as of those
NASA/Apollo missions A11, A14 and A16).

As I've often stipulated before, that most any interactive 3D solar
system simulator puts Venus smack within good EVA obtained views of at
least those three missions (always within each of their command module's
orbital view), and I might as well further add, that we have those free
cellphone cameras with apparently far better DR and of a wider spectrum
capability than what our newest MESSENGER mirror optics and spendy 14+db
CCD could apparently muster, as proof-positive via their flyby of Earth
which only provided us with a rather naked looking and otherwise
somewhat pastel view of Earth, w/o even so much as once accommodating
our physically dark moon, much less having shared upon any other
significant planets or stars that simply had to be there, yet all such
other items were getting artificially made as invisible/stealth as were
all of those Muslim WMD.

Remember that starshine as well as earthshine upon the moon is
absolutely vibrant to the unfiltered Kodak eye that's far more sensitive
to having recorded such near-UV and UV-a spectrums than our human eye,
which can't hardly if even detect, not to mention those pesky gamma and
hard-X-ray spectrums of which that moon of our's is absolutely chuck
full of such TBI(total body irradiation) dosage that's simply much worse
off than any lethal hot zone within our Van Allen belts, and that's
still not even including upon all of the continual thermal trauma of
their having to survive those double IR/FIR spectrums that also
coexisted, as coming at their naked moonsuit from nearly all surrounding
directions in addition to whatever sol was directly contributing.

That physically dark and somewhat salty moon of ours is what's actually
a darn good IR/FIR reflector, and otherwise represents a rather ****
poor UV reflector because, such UV energy often gets absorbed and/or
interacts as creating secondary/recoil photons of the [UV black light
generated] near-blue spectrum. Of course the solar and cosmic influx is
what also represents lethal buttloads of having generated those
secondary/recoil photons of gamma and hard-X-rays, with zilch worth of
any attenuation from all possible directions, meaning that your wussy
moonsuit is surrounded by an absolute minimum lethal gauntlet of 3.14e6
m2 that's contributing the full secondary spectrum worth of whatever's
downright nasty if not lethal to your frail DNA, as well as continually
impacting each and every physically more than boiling role of all that
sensitive Kodak film.

Wayne Throop:
If you substitute venus for earth, it'd show up in the shot.
Even if you move earth far away, it'd still show up, until it's so far
away its light is falling on less than a single grain of the photograph;
but as long as its idealized image is at least a single grain big, that
grain would still be exposed.

Instead, we see a somewhat naked guano island like reflective
environment, for as far as the human and unfiltered Kodak eyes could
see, in places having a thin and naturally terrestrial clumping 50/50
dusting of portland cement and cornmeal that was entirely xenon lamp
spectrum illuminated (meaning w/o UV), whereas instead of their having
to deal with whatever the raw and nearly point source of the extremely
contrasty solar spectrum should have had to offer, along with such raw
influx having unavoidably shared absolute extra loads worth of the
near-UV and UV-a energy. Therefore, there's absolutely nothing of such
hocus-pocus artificial content within such bogus images, or otherwise of
mission associated content, that's worth a freaking hoot, much less a
scientific hoot.

Of course there's many other iffy if not downright naysay worthy
fly-by-rocket and still unproven lunar lander factors that simply do not
add up to what those pesky regular laws of physics and of replicated
science and of otherwise proven lander technology has to say.

Sorry that the likes of "Wayne Throop", "rick_so" and myself as your
pesky historical revisionist team, and otherwise truth telling
messengers from hell, must continually **** on your silly hocus-pocus
parade.
-
Brad Guth

Of a similar topic that's worthy of open disclosu
Velikovsky/Neocatastrophism Sources / banished from Mailgate

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.o...a52739c889bcc2

http://mygate.mailgate.org/mynews/rec/rec.org.mensa/Pbb1h.956$CT5.551%40trnddc02?order=smart&p=1/469


--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG