![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 20:35:48 +0000, Pete Lawrence wrote: I used to believe this too Chris. Unfortunately it's not as reliable as you would think... Well, that just goes to show that this rule is variable with location both for visual and imaging. Certainly, at my site, the degree of twinkling correlates almost perfectly with long-exposure FWHM. I also use twinkling as a gauge and which I have found to be accurate as well (for imaging). Anthony. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
M48/NGC 2548 - Great seeing but poor transparency | Anthony Ayiomamitis | Amateur Astronomy | 28 | February 25th 07 09:10 PM |
relative transparency | Tom Rauschenbach | Amateur Astronomy | 4 | August 23rd 06 04:41 PM |
seeing and transparency | Michael | Amateur Astronomy | 6 | January 23rd 04 03:13 AM |
Seeing and Transparency | Edward Smith | Amateur Astronomy | 12 | January 17th 04 04:56 PM |
Seeing and Transparency | Edward Smith | Misc | 2 | January 17th 04 12:15 AM |