![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 19 Jan 2007 23:33:17 -0600, Pat Flannery
wrote: Everyone said Hale-Bopp was better, but at least up here, Hyakutake was better. ....Up in the Great White North and it's Yankee cousins, Hayukantspelme was more visible, while Hale-Bopp looked better below the Yankee Line of Agression. Both as I pointed out on today's OMBlog, they both were spectacular, but due to all this waste of a winter storm the skies were consistently overcast, and any efforts to view C/2006 P1 were for McNaught. OM -- ]=====================================[ ] OMBlog - http://www.io.com/~o_m/omworld [ ] Let's face it: Sometimes you *need* [ ] an obnoxious opinion in your day! [ ]=====================================[ |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() OM wrote: better. ...Up in the Great White North and it's Yankee cousins, Hayukantspelme was more visible, while Hale-Bopp looked better below the Yankee Line of Agression. Saw both, but Hale-Bopp's tail was nowhere near as good as Hayutke's. The one I of course missed as a kid was Ikeya-Seki. God, I still remember Kohutek ... "Comet of the Century!" "Comet of the weak" was more like it. (How many misspellings did I do in this posting?) Pat |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 20 Jan 2007 04:57:54 -0600, Pat Flannery
wrote: God, I still remember Kohutek ... "Comet of the Century!" ....The problem with Kohoutek was that the Western news media believed the TASS hype about how much of a display it was going to provide. Much of the hype was based on Lubos Kohoutek's claim that, based on the orbital period of 75,000 years, the comet was quite probably an Oort Cloud object on its first trip around the Sun. At that time, astronomers believed that comets originating from the Oort cloud - especially the outer regions - would produce long, bright and thick tails because they were "virgin" comets and had a lot of loose surface material to discard to the solar winds. The comet's performance with regards to expectations was poor enough that most astronomers now believe Comet Kohoutek was, in fact, a Kuiper Belt Object, and therefore possessed a more compacted, denser surface that didn't scour free as easily as it approached perhelion. ....The comet did produce a tail that was visible to the naked eye, but that was only after perhelion, and was serious attenuated by the atmosphere. Best views of the comet at its actual peak were achieved by the Skylab 4 crew, and even they were notably nonplussed by the event thanks to all the hype. In fact, the only one who really benefitted - and I use the word sarcastically here - from Kohoutek was a religious cult whacko named David Berg, who used the comet as a "sign of the apocalypse(*)" to increase the numbers of his "Children of God" cult and provide more innocent children for his perverted sex games. (*) You just don't know how hard it is for me not to spell that as "Apokolips". Jack Kirby's influence still holds true, natch! OM -- ]=====================================[ ] OMBlog - http://www.io.com/~o_m/omworld [ ] Let's face it: Sometimes you *need* [ ] an obnoxious opinion in your day! [ ]=====================================[ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Comet C/2006 P1 (McNaught) on January 8 and 10 | Dave Mitsky | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | January 11th 07 05:57 AM |
Comet C/2006 P1 McNaught photos | Pete Lawrence | Amateur Astronomy | 19 | January 10th 07 11:59 AM |
Comet C/2006 P1 McNaught photos | Pete Lawrence | UK Astronomy | 14 | January 10th 07 11:59 AM |
Comet C/2006 P1 McNaught *very* bright as seen from Norway | Carsten A. Arnholm | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | January 8th 07 04:32 PM |
Comet C/2006 P1 McNaught Observation Reports Please! | Shawn | Amateur Astronomy | 1 | January 8th 07 05:25 AM |