![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Yousuf Khan wrote: George Dishman wrote: Yousuf Khan wrote: I look upon it in a fluid mechanics point of view. The intergalactic gas is a gas afterall, therefore loose and easy to move. The galaxies on the other hand are more like solids, their stars tightly bound together, harder to tug around except all as a unit. The air around us is far more massive than we as tiny little solid-body creatures are, however the air is far more affected by the Earth's rotation than we are (i.e. wind). Yes, I was thinking of the galaxies like shot from two guns shooting at each other simultaneously, the pellets are unlikely to impact as they are small compared to their separation (for a reasonable range). I was thinking the gas arrived ahead of the galaxies *and* the dark matter. But in the picture it is behind. The red, blue and cluster on the right are moving to the right. Let me just lay out my mind's eye description for you about what I'm picturing here, so that we don't dance around the issue too much. What I'm thinking here is that the Universe is a flowing ocean with islands embedded inside it. Of course the water in the ocean I'm talking about is space-time, and the islands are the galaxies and galactic clusters inside it. The problem with that picture is that spacetime is traced by free-falling test particles and they wil accelerate towards a mass whereas a flow of water approaching an island is slowed. As the water flows around the islands, it slows down ahead of it, to its sides, and behind it, creating a boundary layer which is bigger than the islands themselves, looking at it from a top-down aerial view. In an archipelago of islands, the boundary layers combine to form a bigger one. Eventually as you get higher in the aerial view, the islands themselves might become insignificant, and all you'll see is the boundary layer. At lower and lower levels, as we go from the galactic cluster to the individual galaxies, then to the stars, we may find that space-time is getting ever more slower at each level. I'm picturing the Dark Matter to be just the boundary layer of a slowed-down space-time flow. In other words, it doesn't exist, it just is an illusion of fluid flowing at different rates. Those two blue clouds seem to be set pretty dead-center upon the galaxies within those two colliding clusters. Yes, if the blue cloud on the left was trailing behind the red cloud and galaxies on the right (and vice versa) it would be a remarkable coincidence that the large cloud associated with the small group of galaxies happened to match the location of the large group of galaxies that is pulling along the small blue cloud :-o I'm not sure what you're trying to say here. Are you agreeing with me? I may have misunderstod your first comment, you seemed to be sugesting the blue region on the left was "slowly following" the small group of galaxies and the red gas on the right and hadn't reached the other blue cloud yet, and vice versa. Thus the dark matter on the left and the galaxies and gas on the right would all be moving from left to right. If that isn't what you meant then then the cloud on the left is associated with the galaxies and gas on the left and they are all moving from right to left. The point of encounter would be half way between the two groups and the galaxies and dark matter have moved almost the same distance since then but the hot gas has moved less far and is consequently displaced from the galaxies. That means any interaction between the dark matter clouds has to be much smaller than for normal matter. What I'm saying is that the dark matter (blue) is always following the galaxies, not the intergalactic gas (red), despite the fact that the gas might be more massive than the galaxies. The little blue cloud is centered atop the little cluster, while the big blue cloud is centered atop the big cluster; and they are *always* centered atop them. In other words, the blue clouds (DM) never diverge away from their galaxies. From the point of view of the group though, they are not moving, it is the other clusters that are moving, so given a reasonable time to reach equilibruim, they must all be centred together, the galaxies gas and dark matter, all in motion about the barycentre of the total of the three. It is only the past encounter with the other cluster that has briefly displaced the gas which is now falling back towards the DM and galaxies. The two blue clouds may eventually converge but they will always be atop the galaxies and not the intergalactic gas as much. What we see at the moment is the galxies/DM moving apart and possibly at a speed that means they will not encounter each other again, with each gas cloud trying to catch up to its home. Here in the water view, the intergalactic gas is just the silt and mud of the Universe that gets pushed around much more easily than the islands. The gas must originally have been associated with the galaxies and the clusters must have passed through each other for the gas to be displaced by the encounter. Yes, that's a possibility. There was one other possibility that I could picture, but it's not as good as what you just described. I was thinking that the other possibility was that the loose gas got drawn out by the gravity of the opposite cluster ahead of the clusters themselves joining. Bear in mind gravity accelerates all masses equally, be it a galaxy or an atom. Tidal forces would tend to stretch the gas because the edge nearer the other group would be pulled more strongly while the far edge would be affected less than the centre, but that's true of both galaxies and ags. You would expect a slight elongation with almost symmetrical tails of gas on both sides of the cluster. The tidal effect can be calculated given the masses and I think it would prove to be much too small and that doesn't explain the marked asymmetry. George |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Black holes, dark matter | Allan Adler | Astronomy Misc | 60 | January 5th 07 05:51 PM |
Correction to dark matter, baby universe, black hole model | stargene | Astronomy Misc | 0 | November 28th 06 12:55 AM |
Dark Matter, Dark Energy, and Black Holes - New Scientist article | Wally Anglesea™ | Misc | 15 | March 14th 06 05:33 PM |
Are Black Holes Dark Matter factories? | Peter Wilson | Research | 15 | March 23rd 04 07:50 AM |
Are Black Holes Dark Matter factories? | Ned Flanders | Research | 20 | January 22nd 04 01:51 PM |