A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Space Station
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Relocate ISS to ME-L1



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 27th 06, 01:39 AM posted to sci.space.station
Brad Guth[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,941
Default Relocate ISS to ME-L1

Since it's officially Usenet taboo to even discuss relocating our
existing ISS to our moon's L1, or especially as for going off to visit
the wizard of Oz at Venus L2, in that case we'll need to start this
nifty LSE-CM/ISS entirely from scratch, or at least allow China to
accomplish what's so impossible for us, especially since we're still
trying so gosh darn hard at dominating global fossil and yellowcake
energy, and especially extra dominating and/or controlling over Muslim
oil before we manage to cause WW-III.

Once again for the record, our moon's L1 is the one and only holy grail
of future space exploration and global domination.

Here's just a few basic considerations for China utilizing our moon's
L1, whereas to improve upon what I'd previously offered to our resident
naysay/anti-think-tank likes of "Wayne Throop". This is basically what
my LSE-CM/ISS or of whatever best utilization of this Moon/Earth L1 has
to offer the open mindset type of folks that are not specifically
looking to merely stalk and bash against everything that's not of their
idea, and/or of whatever's under their sun that's apparently orbiting
their Old Testament flat Earth (and for Christ's sake on a stick, that
was merely another pun, so get over it).

I'm not the bad guy or even the messenger from hell, I'm not even anti
bible/koran thumping as long is it isn't being tossed in my face or
otherwise being utilized against my honest intentions to share and share
alike. Most faith based individuals are really quite nice folks that
wouldn't hurt a Muslim fly, whereas their supposed troopers as
represented within Usenet are for the most part downright insane.

A brief list of the moon's L1 benefits to humanity, and quite possibly
the best possible salvation to our global warming fiasco:

Moon L1 represents the ultimate of Star Wars and of NEO defensive high
ground.

Unlimited interplanetary mission launch capability, away from the 1e9 m3
CM/ISS.

Unlimited tether dipole energy (as in how many clean terawatts would you
like?)

Safe and efficient access to/from our earthshine illuminated moon's
surface.

Unlimited (mostly robotic) access to extracting lunar He3, plus
countless other nifty elements.

Effective and efficient interplanetary and interstellar communications
via quantum/FM binary laser cannon packets.

The ultimate of an efficient fuel/refuel depot, plus the one and only
efficient access to whatever tonnage of composite shielding you'd ever
care to add to each mission.

VLA/SAR imaging of say less than a meter resolution of whatever's at the
distance of Jupiter, therefore all potential NEOs of whatever's larger
than a meter are fully identified and easily tracked before their having
reached the critical realm of Jupiter.

BTW; The tether dipole element's termination platform that's extended
away from the primary L1 CM/ISS, as per reaching that dipole tethered
unit to within as little as 4r of Earth (isn't that good news, or what)
is simply a given, whereas having such a nearby interactive location can
be utilized for all sorts of invaluable contributions to Earth and moon
science and the advancement of humanity's role in exploiting the vast
wealth of other planets and moons. Imagine also how many Muslim butts
or the likes of whomever on your axis of evil list that your kind could
so easily fry from that nearby platform, that's hosting a dozen or so of
those nifty 100 GW laser cannons.

There no question that I'll have to edit a few of my existing LSE-CM/ISS
papers, in order to further reflect upon and/or embellish upon these
constructive/positive aspects of our being in charge of this one and
only moon L1 zone that's parked roughly 60,000 km from the physically
dark and nasty lunar deck.

Even if not initially tethered to the moon, the efficient
station-keeping demands per tonne of whatever ISS like craft (aka Clarke
Station) shouldn't be 1% of what our present day ISS is demanding. Our
moon's interactive L1 is also a rather nifty do-everything location
where the most tonnage per given fly-by-rocket effort is going to offer
the utmost accomplishment for those mostly robotic deployments, that can
be effectively remote flown, all the way down to the cm resolution, from
most any MicroSoft flight simulator equipped laptop PC or MAC.

My notion of the final 1e9 m3 CM/ISS abode is that of a 256e6 tonne
installation that's fully tethered to the moon, with as much as 99.9% of
that mass (including whatever tethers) as being derived from the moon
itself. Even though that sounds horrifically big, massive and a touch
complex, as such it certainly doesn't have to start out all that big and
massive or complex. Too bad there's only room for one such LSE-CM/ISS,
of which China is most likely going to own and operate this on our
behalf (free of charge? somehow I don't think so).

Do you folks speak a little Chinese, or at least some Mandarin worthy
slang?
-
Brad Guth


--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.