PSR B1931+24 slows down more rapidly because aliens have a machine

a_plutonium wrote:
### quoting http://www.jb.man.ac.uk/news/brakingpulsar/
Part-time pulsar yields new insight into inner workings of cosmic
clocks

Astronomers using the 76-m Lovell radio telescope at the University of
Manchester's Jodrell Bank Observatory have discovered a very strange
pulsar that helps explain how pulsars act as 'cosmic clocks' and
confirms theories put forward 37 years ago to explain the way in which
pulsars emit their regular beams of radio waves - considered to be one
of the hardest problems in astrophysics. Their research, now published

It is only hard because they never looked at other possibilities. They
only presumed these were "neutron stars".

When pulsars were first discovered they were called LGMs standing for
"little green men". It is a shame that physicists have a pitiful one
track mind when they consider pulsars as "neutron stars". And they will
bend physics to suit themselves rather than simplify everything when
they posit that a pulsar is alien communication.


in Science Express, reveals a pulsar that is only 'on' for part of the
time. The strange pulsar is spinning about its own axis and slows down
50% faster when it is 'on' compared to when it is 'off'.


To understand this best, would require an engineer rather than
theoretical physicists working on a false assumption. To get the best
engineers together to build a "pulsar machine". In the colloboration of
building such a machine, it will come to light that the machine slows
down more rapidly when in the on position due to engineering.



Pulsars are dense, highly magnetized neutron stars that are born in a
violent explosion marking the death of massive stars. They act like
cosmic lighthouses as they project a rotating beam of radio waves
across the galaxy. Dr. Michael Kramer explains, "Pulsars are a
physicist's dream come true. They are made of the most extreme matter
that we know of in the Universe, and their highly stable rotation makes
them super-precise cosmic clocks. But, embarrassingly, we do not know
how these clocks work. This discovery goes a long way towards solving
this problem."


The big trouble of 20th century physics is that although Bohr and the
Quantum Physicists won every challenge against Einstein and his
pathetic GR, that the main body of physicists in the 20th century did
the irrational thing of following Einstein and his pathetic GR. Even
though QM won over GR and everything that Einstein did in astronomy.
Yet the physicists worshipped Einstein and GR when they should have
followed Bohr and QM.

If they had followed Bohr and QM, then we would not have papers and
journals filled with the hogwash of neutron star, black-holes, string
theory and other assorted nonsense.

If the physicists of the 20th century had had better commonsense and
better logical reasoning they would have stuck with QM and Bohr and
followed Dirac and Bell. They would have known that "neutron stars"
violate QM and the Pauli Exclusion Principle and that stars never
crunch into a neutron state of matter.

They would have looked for a different explanation for Pulsars. And the
first explanation when discovered in 1967 is often usually the correct
explanation. They thought they were "little green men" and called them
LGM.




The research team, led by Dr. Michael Kramer, found a pulsar that is
only periodically active. It appears as a normal pulsar for about a
week and then "switches off" for about one month before emitting pulses
again. The pulsar, called PSR B1931+24, is unique in this behaviour and

I speculate that if Mike Kramer could survey the cosmic skies around
B1931+24, that he will find a nearby neighbor who is beaming a radio
pulsed signal to that of B1931. In other words, two different star
systems are communicating to each other. One is saying information for
which it is prompting B1931 to shut down and then rebroadcast later.

Because of the engineering of a pulsar machine by these aliens, that it
takes this time lag for slowing down as compared to starting up.


affords astronomers an opportunity to compare its quiet and active
phases. As it is quiet the majority of the time, it is difficult to
detect, suggesting that there may be many other similar objects that
have, so far, escaped detection.


I would differ on that point when we consider all pulsars as alien
machines. In this viewpoint, we probably have all the pulsars accounted
for in our corner of the cosmic skies.

I still need a graphic of every pulsar known and how far apart they are
from one another. It gives us a uniform density of life on other
planets.


Prof. Andrew Lyne points out that, "After the discovery of pulsars,
theoreticians proposed that strong electric fields rip particles out of
the neutron star surface into a surrounding magnetised cloud of plasma
called the magnetosphere. But, for nearly 40 years, there had been no
way to test whether our basic understanding was correct."


No, the trouble with Andrew Lyne is that when you are under a false
assumption of what pulsars are in the first place, that every time a
different pulsar is found, then more and more beyond the pale
explanations have to be rigged and hornswaggled to try to fit the new
pulsar in with the old pulsars.

On the other hand, when you start with the assumption that pulsars are
alien communication, then the reverse logic comes into play where every
new and "Strange pulsar" adds support and adds credence to the
hypothesis that it is alien life.

The stranger pulsars become and the more difficult to explain adds that
much more credence to the assumption of alien communication.


The University of Manchester astronomers were delighted when they found
that this pulsar slows down more rapidly when the pulsar is on than
when it is off. Dr. Christine Jordan points out the importance of this
discovery, "We can clearly see that something hits the brakes when the
pulsar is on."


Under Christine's bad assumption that pulsars are "neutron stars" then
Jordan will have to come up with some horrible and hairy nonliving
physical explanation that defies much of modern physics. But if Jordan,
on the other hand, simply assumed that B1931 was in a state of
communication with a neighboring pulsar which it required B1931 to shut
down the machine and change the frequency. Well, it all becomes so easy
to explain and to understand.



This breaking mechanism must be related to the radio emission and the
processes creating it and the additional slow-down can be explained by
a wind of particles leaving the pulsar's magnetosphere and carrying
away rotational energy. "Such a braking effect of the pulsar wind was
expected but now, finally, we have observational evidence for it" adds
Dr Duncan Lorimer.

It is a shame that modern scientists such as Duncan Lorimer dive into
complex physics when they should more often lift themselves up and ask
a few logical questions. Why make things complex? Am I missing
something that would make this entire issue so very down to Earth and
simple? Have I learned Occam's Razor rather than spend so much time on
learning details?

What would take Duncan a hundred pages of physics and math to explain
B1931 strange behavior. Yet take only one paragraph to explain as
alien's communicating with other aliens via a pulsing machine.


The amount of braking can be related to the number of charges leaving
the pulsar magnetosphere. Dr. Michael Kramer explains their surprise
when it was found that the resulting number was within 2% of the
theoretical predictions. "We were really shocked when we saw these
numbers on our screens. Given the pulsar's complexity, we never really
expected the magnetospheric theory to work so well."

Mike Kramer is deluding himself and readers. In the past 40 years of
pulsar history, these objects are not becoming more understandable but
rather more complex. And the reason being is that we are under a false
assumption that they are "neutron stars". When you dismiss neutron
stars, then these objects become easier under the hypothesis of alien
communication.


Prof. Andrew Lyne summarized the result: "It is amazing that, after
almost 40 years, we have not only found a new, unusual, pulsar
phenomenon but also a very unexpected way to confirm some fundamental
theories about the nature of pulsars."

### end quoting http://www.jb.man.ac.uk/news/brakingpulsar/


Andrew Lyne would spend better time in looking for 2 pulsars nearby to
one another. Where one shuts down while the other is pulsing. While one
changes its frequency and a time delay the second changes its
frequency. The time delay is the amount of time required for the pulse
to travel between the aliens.

If Andrew found such a circumstance, he would have found the first
proof of advanced alien life, other than humanity. And Andrew would
then have put pulsars on a true track rather than its current false
track of neutron stars.

What we need is the report of two pulsars linked together in their
pulsing. Where one shuts down and changes frequency corresponding to
the other shutting down and changing frequency. Trouble is of the
distance separating pulsars is usually more than 10 light years. And
with the few number of total pulsars, our chances of spotting pulsar
linked communication is not going to be easy.

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies