![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
:: It illustrates the folly of an inappropriate definition of "efficiency".
: h (Rand Simberg) : Which one is the "right" one depends on what one is trying to : optimize. There is no obvious correct answer. Unfortunately, one of : the reasons that launch is so expensive is that engineers focus on : technical measures of efficiency (e.g., the Isp of the SSME) instead : of on cost efficiency. Yes, dollars in per similar goal out is almost always the right one. I don't see that nuclear pulse propulsion is markedly worse than alternatives. It is politicaly unacceptable, and a PR nightmare in the current social climate, and arguably has unacceptable environmental impact in some uses, and that's part of the "almost always". But I don't see those as "efficiency" issues in this case. Wayne Throop http://sheol.org/throopw |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Constellation Talk | SunSeeker | Amateur Astronomy | 14 | July 10th 06 06:56 PM |
Astral Form - Crookes work (part 2) | expert | Astronomy Misc | 0 | April 13th 04 12:05 PM |
Let's Destroy The Myth Of Astrology!! | GFHWalker | Astronomy Misc | 11 | December 9th 03 10:28 PM |