![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yesterday I saw what must have been two stars in broad daylight, or
else I saw two geostationary satellites flaring brightly. I'm betting on the former, but it would sure be exciting if it were the latter! Even seeing stars in daylight is pretty neat -- I have once before seen in daylight what was later identified as Jupiter, but I did not know that any stars were bright enough to share that honor, thus my speculation that I was seeing flaring geostationary satellites. Here's the information: I was watching an airplane cross the sky when I saw these two points of light. Had my eyes not already been focused on the airplane it is doubtful I would have seen the two points. It was broad daylight* (about 1900 local time, Sunday, September 10, 2006, Sarasota, Florida, USA, or 2300 UTC September 10, 2006), and the only thing that might have helped improve the viewing in that part of the generally clear sky is that a heavy layer of cirrus had blown off a thunderstorm, and in a hole in that canopy the sky was RELATIVELY darker than the clear sky elsewhere. (Coordinates for Sarasota: 27.34 north; 82.53 west.) (*Sunset was at 1939 local.) What I observed: Two points of light about three or four degrees apart and about equal brightness. The brightness was steady and did not vary, and I observed these points for about five minutes until finally the cirrus canopy obscured them. The points of light had no apparent motion, and their color was bluish white. I can't estimate the magnitude, but it had to have been pretty bright for me to have seen these objects in full daylight? The azimuth was approximately NNE, and the elevation was approximately 30 degrees above the horizon. Through binoculars the points remained just that, points. If they had been weather balloons I think that my 8X binoculars would have been powerful enough to have resolved some kind of shape, therefore I'm guessing that these objects were not in the atmosphere. So, what do the members of the group think I saw? A couple of bright stars, viewed under just the right daylight viewing conditions, or could it have been brightly flaring geostationary satellites? I don't even know if there are any geostationary satellites in that part of the sky - aren't most (or all) of them parked in equatorial orbits and would have required me to have been looking southward instead of northward? A puzzler, huh? I thank the group in advance for any help that might be rendered in helping to identify what I saw, or at least eliminate from the list of possibilities what it probably wasn't (a couple of geostationary satellites). |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi,
Nice observation! I can't for the life of me think that it was a satellite: I've observed many Iridium flares, up to a magnitude of -7, one of them in what was classed as 'broad daylight' but in reality was far closer to sunset than your observation. The key to deciphering your objects are your words: 'brightness was steady' and 'observed these points for about five minutes'. This rules out LEOs and Molniyas. LEOs like Iridium flash brightly for 15 seconds or so but traverse one end of the visible sky to the other in that time. Deep sky objects like GPS (27,000 km mean distance) or geostationary (42,000 km) are not seen by observers with the naked eye and even skilled observers (I've not seen one!) use binoculars or telescopes or capture them on video with CCD and interpret the flaring as a thicker line on the video. The flare time generally lasts a few seconds as the object spins or tumbles or both. As you point out, the geostationary objects are aligned equatorially, in the opposite direction to where you were looking. Even if there was a satellite with a period of one sidereal day but non zero inclination, it could appear to remain above your location for 5 minutes but in that time it would have travelled 900 km along its orbit and the chances of it putting out a steady flare (ie no spin, no tumble, perfect sun-MMA-observer alignment) are not high. Let alone the chances of a second object with identical behaviour . . . and all one hour before civil twilight . . . We can rule out a planet, as the ecliptic plane was behind you. I'm going to guess that the thunderstorm cleared the dust / pollution from the air, making the light appear not to twinkle while masking the sun. I can't believe you would see a star of magnitude +2 or +3 under these circumstances so if it was a star, I would start at close separation, zero magnitude contenders such as Vega and Deneb. The angular separation between the two isn't bad but the Az El is not quite the same, but not wildly different. Otherwise, I'd go for a pair of high altitude weather balloons or personally, lean towards two aircraft in formation. Must have been a few aircraft patrolling so close to September 11 and we've all seen aircraft on a 20 to 30 degree or so approach to a city and had to check back over several minutes to resolve exactly what it was. Just a few weeks back I thought I'd spotted my first NOSS satellite formation and was quite disappointed when three minutes later they separated and went off in different directions. Be interested to hear any alternative explanation. Cheers, Bill Canberra, Australia |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Oops, WhiteStarLine stupidly wrote: snip . . . like Iridium flash brightly for 15 seconds or so but traverse one end of the visible sky to the other in that time . . . /snip Poor proof reading! I didn't really mean that they whizzed across the night sky in 15 seconds, just that a typical low orbit satellite is visible for a few minutes and in that time tracks across a significant part of the visible sky. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The Sloan Digital Sky Survey turns its eye on the Milky Way (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | January 14th 06 04:27 AM |
Milky Way's Big Bang | Giovanni | Astronomy Misc | 30 | January 6th 04 10:32 AM |
Incontrovertible Evidence | Cash | Astronomy Misc | 1 | August 24th 03 07:22 PM |
Stars Rich In Heavy Metals Tend To Harbor Planets, Astronomers Report | Ron Baalke | Misc | 5 | August 10th 03 10:58 PM |