![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mark McIntyre" wrote in message
A few terajoules is NOT a horrific amount of energy. Try thunderstorms. I've taken your advice and learned a little something of terrestrial thunder storm energy. http://www.thenakedscientists.com/HT...ithcolumn5.htm "At any time there are over 2,000 thunderstorms occurring worldwide, each producing over a 100 lightning strikes a second. That's over 8 million lightning bolts every day." "Each lightning flash is about 3 miles long but only about a centimetre wide. It discharges about 1-10 billion joules of energy" His own math seems sufficiently conservative, but we certainly get the idea that an average lightning strike is perhaps worthy of 2e9 joules. If using his slight under-estimate of merely 8 million strikes per day is 8e6 * 2e9 = 16e15 joules/day or upon average 185e9 joules/second worth of terrestrial lightning energy that's getting discharged at any moment, and along with our rapidly failing magnetosphere by a factor of 0.05%/year means that lots more of such solar wind driven atmospheric energy discharges are likely to transpire, and I guess that's a good sort of thing as scripted within your NASA infomercial-science based koran. I guess it's also a darn good thing our moon has that stealth hocus-pocus shield that's so much better off than our magnetosphere, whereas otherwise those moonsuit fools would be in serious trouble, as in TBI(total body irradiated) plus solar and cosmic charged particles worth of River City sort of trouble, and of their being rather nicely exposed to such nifty gamma, X-rays and otherwise in direct touch with being highly electrostatic covered while trekking through tens of meters worth of absolutely dry and thereby fluffy element depths of local basalt plus meteorite moon-dust that's rather carbon/graphite sooty, iron, titanium and perhaps even a little radium and cobalt like dark and nasty, as well as still a touch salty and not all that likely to clump, not to mention their getting rather nicely double IR roasted by day and continually blind sided by whatever items passing by 36+ km/s, plus somehow dodging those nasty bits of incoming debris or that of their unavoidable secondary shards. Now then, 185e9 joules is I believe a touch less impressive than 2e20 joules, and it's even less than the 254e9 joules of extra recession energy that's involved with the ongoing exit of our moon, that which can be measured without having to involve any stinking retroreflectors that supposedly at best offers all of 3 wussy photons per minute out of trillions per laser ranging effort. Actually, other than an efficient IR laser bounce, radar/radio ranging is so much easier and more reliable, especially if known amounts of specific wavelength elements were ever deployed from orbit and having subsequently survived hitting that dusty deck. - Brad Guth -- Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Space Calendar - May 24, 2006 | [email protected] | History | 0 | May 24th 06 04:12 PM |
Space Calendar - March 23, 2006 | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | March 23rd 06 04:18 PM |
Space Calendar - January 26, 2006 | [email protected] | History | 0 | January 28th 06 12:42 AM |
Space Calendar - October 27, 2005 | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 27th 05 05:02 PM |
Space Calendar - February 25, 2005 | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | February 25th 05 04:25 PM |