Heim's Gravity Engine?

Mike Dennis wrote:
"Sue..." wrote in message
s.com...

Mike Dennis wrote:
"Danny Dot" wrote in message
...
An engineering friend of mine sent this to me. The American Institute
of
Astronautics and Aeronautics (AIAA) has published papers on this idea.

It is a way to propel a spacecraft using the action of gravity.

My friend tells me it is possible that highly classified programs are
attempting to make this form of propulsion as we speak.

It's also highly possible that this theory doesn't have any validity. It
relies on a bunch of things that should be relatively easy to detect in
accelerator collisions--yet nothing has been found to back it up.

Negative graviphotons are already in use as optical tweezers and
tho the terrminolgy is a bit different, Tajar & de Matos's experiment
demonstrates some validity.


Yeah, I'd agree the terminology is a bit different--as in "we're not talking
about the same thing at all..."

I'm talking about physical evidence--not unproven theories piled upon other
unproven theories. If you want to play here you have to understand that
many people here know what these words actually mean.

So far not a trace of a Higgs mechanism has been detected
http://www.fnal.gov/ ..and the
results of the first direct experiment of Einsten's gravity are due
around
the end of the year.
http://einstein.stanford.edu/

So... to-date the Tajmar/de Matos experiment IS the best proof...
or disproof as the case may be.

Sue...