![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#91
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Arnold wrote: Rich wrote: I remember back in the 1990s they were using computers with spare processing power to analyze signals to look for extraterrestrial life. I read the Drake Equation and wonder, how do you have a scientific theory when EVERY term in an equation is an unknown variable? I hope NASA, etc, never put any money into this rubbish. 1. Do yourself a favour and google the "WOW! signal". It was a 'perfect' alien signal but it didn't repeat. Imagine it was real! 2. The SETI Institute is privately funded and as far as I know, US tax dollars are not used for SETI searches. 3. There were and will be a lot of spin-off discoveries made from doing searches for alien signals. Seti@home data led to some unplanned discoveries related to the distribution of hydrogen in the galaxy. 4. Do not limit your thinking to radio signals only. Projects exist that look for optical signals like lasers. One day we might even detect artificial alien structures using sensitive infra-red detectors. The point is - although the galaxy is not blaring with alien beacons or radio stations, we should still try and detect electromagnetic emissions of artificial origin. If we don't, we will never know the truth. Most good discoveries come by accident. Maybe not searching is the key to discovery? We are our own first instance of extra terrestrial life? As suggested in another post, have a look at the Planetary Society's website for more info (see link below). I keep an open mind. Never say never. -- 25° 45' S 28° 12' E GMT+2 Join the Planetary Society http://www.planetary.org |
#92
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 23 Aug 2006 01:23:13 GMT, "Richard Jarnagin"
wrote: To be honest, I don't know, but the military and commercial pilots are better trained in distinguishing between astronomical objects and unknown craft anyway... I can tell you that by far the least accurate meteor reports I get are from airline pilots. Police aren't much better. (I'm in occasional contact with a sheriff deputy who regularly sees UFOs- presumed alien- in the San Luis Valley, Colorado). _________________________________________________ Chris L Peterson Cloudbait Observatory http://www.cloudbait.com |
#93
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Davoud:
Now, the alien races who send their astronauts to earth -- over light years at incalculable cost -- do they choose their ablest pilots, engineers, and scientists, creatures with an unquenchable thirst for exploring the cosmos? No. They send sex perverts whose sole mission appears to be to abduct and abuse semi-literate white people who live in trailer parks in the western United States. It hardly seems to be worth the trouble. Pierre Vandevenne: Maybe that is the way they punish their sex offenders? ;-) Or reward them? Davoud -- usenet *at* davidillig dawt com |
#94
|
|||
|
|||
![]() ----- Original Message ----- From: "Davoud" Newsgroups: sci.astro.amateur Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2006 11:57 PM Subject: Are the SETI kooks still at it? Richard Jarnagin wrote: There's at least one other answer... they're already here. Given the credibility of some of the multiple witness accounts (police officers, military and commercial aviation pilots, etc., etc.), I wouldn't rule this one out. Your entire argument rests on a false premise -- an urban legend, if you will -- and that false premise is that police officers and military and commercial pilots are somehow more credible witnesses than the average person. That's no false premise, my close-minded friend, that's a fact. Military and commercial pilots spend thousands of hours in the air, and they are very familiar with the night sky and all types of aircraft. This alone makes them FAR more credible witnesses than the average person who has little experience with either. Furthermore, it has to be something pretty spectacular before most military and commercial pilots would even consider reporting it. I have heard them go on the record stating they were apprehensive of the negative consequences to their career of reporting a UFO sighting. But when you're looking at a large craft making "impossible" maneuvers, up-close, it's difficult to just ignore it. As a result, several have come forward over the years, and in some cases, entire flight crews witnessed the event. They have no claim to be such. On the contrary, a person, regardless of occupation or experience, who claims to have seen an alien spacecraft is /ipso/ /facto/ not a reliable witness. Well, there's no convincing someone with that attitude. I get this image of a huge alien craft coming down on top of you, and all the while you are chanting "It's just the planet Venus, it's just the planet Venus, it's just the planet Venus..." sqqiiisssshhhhhhh!!! whoops. So much for extrat errestrial relationships. Seriously, try to be a little more open-minded. Why don't they just land on the lawn of the White House? There's another question with multiple possible answers, though I must admit, I do find it odd that there are many different kinds of crafts reported, but NONE of them have chosen to make open contact. Do you, now? Find that odd, I mean? Here's what profoundly amazes me about the aliens that come to earth. Space travel, we have learned, places incredible demands, both physical and mental, on astronauts. We pick our brightest and most fit pilots, engineers, and scientists to be astronauts. Putting people into space -- just a couple of hundred miles from home -- is enormously expensive. The cost of sending a manned spacecraft over countless light years to find and visit an alien civilization is incalculable; the risk of failure must be near enough to 100 percent as makes no difference. Now, the alien races who send their astronauts to earth -- over light years at incalculable cost You make the assumption that "aliens" with much more advanced technology than our own are sending craft out into the Universe under the same conditions that would apply to us. THAT is a false premise, and a ridiculous one too, if you think about it. It may be the equivalent of a transoceanic flight for all we know. -- do they choose their ablest pilots, engineers, and scientists, creatures with an unquenchable thirst for exploring the cosmos? No. They send sex perverts whose sole mission appears to be to abduct and abuse semi-literate white people who live in trailer parks in the western United States. It hardly seems to be worth the trouble. LOL, if that were their mission, I would have to agree. But I suspect, like the rest of your argument, you have a flawed analysis of the situation. |
#95
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Florian" wrote in message news ![]() To be honest, I don't know, but the military and commercial pilots are better trained in distinguishing between astronomical objects and unknown craft anyway. I doubt that. ..Florian I'm not surprised. Think about it some more. RJ |
#96
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Chris L Peterson" wrote in message ... On Wed, 23 Aug 2006 01:23:13 GMT, "Richard Jarnagin" wrote: To be honest, I don't know, but the military and commercial pilots are better trained in distinguishing between astronomical objects and unknown craft anyway... I can tell you that by far the least accurate meteor reports I get are from airline pilots. Police aren't much better. (I'm in occasional contact with a sheriff deputy who regularly sees UFOs- presumed alien- in the San Luis Valley, Colorado). I'm not sure there's a correlation between the accuracy of a meteor report and being able to distinguish between a known aircraft, an astronomical object, and a UFO. I would be interested in details, though, just for the sake of my own personal knowledge. Thanks. RJ |
#97
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You make the assumption that "aliens" with much more advanced technology
than our own are sending craft out into the Universe under the same conditions that would apply to us. THAT is a false premise, and a ridiculous one too, if you think about it. Okay, so describe under what sort of different conditions an alien would be sending craft out into the universe. ..Florian |
#98
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've said it before but i do like these UFO/alien threads since they always expose the loonies.
;-) ..Florian |
#99
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Florian" wrote in message ... I've said it before but i do like these UFO/alien threads since they always expose the loonies. ;-) ..Florian Yeah, that's me, a loonie... now go sleep securely in your self-inflicted ignorant bliss. You're still top life form in your neighborhood of the Universe and all is well. And they all lived happily ever after. The End. RJ |
#100
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Florian wrote:
I've said it before but i do like these UFO/alien threads since they always expose the loonies. ;-) .Florian Yup! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Chapeau! @ H. Paul Shuch! | SETI ITALIA Bruno IK2WQA | SETI | 4 | December 7th 04 08:35 PM |
What is a kook? | Jochen | Misc | 5 | July 27th 04 01:02 AM |
From SETI Institute: Every day is "Earth Day" | SETI ITALIA Bruno IK2WQA | SETI | 2 | May 29th 04 12:55 AM |
Request to SETI - Was: Thank You From SETI | David Woolley | SETI | 17 | May 28th 04 12:40 PM |